The Young Turk Revolution of 1908 and the Restoration of Constitutional Rule According to the Press Organs of the Great European Powers

Pir Murat Sivri

Makale detayları

The Young Turk Revolution of 1908 and the Restoration of Constitutional Rule According to the Press Organs of the Great European Powers

Yazarlar:

Pir Murat Sivri

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Genel Türk Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi:

Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları Issue 45, pp.27-72

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324740

pISSN:

1304-9720

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The declaration of the Constitutional Monarchy was followed with great interest by Western public opinion. Both Western statesmen and the press dwelt on this event seriously. Although statesmen congratulated the Ottoman authorities on the proclamation of the Constitutional Monarchy as a matter of political courtesy, they did not refrain from analyzing at length what this development meant for their own countries. For countries like Britain and France, the proclamation of the Constitutional Monarchy was a positive development, while Russia and Germany openly expressed their concerns. Small Balkan countries such as Greece and Bulgaria were also skeptical of the Constitutional Monarchy, believing that it would harm their interests in Macedonia. The Western press, on the other hand, largely supported the Constitutional Monarchy, believing that it would pave the way for a new phase of development in the East. This study seeks to answer the question of how the Constitutional Monarchy was received by Western public opinion in the light of archival documents, especially press materials and copyrighted works.

 The declaration of the Constitutional Monarchy was followed with great interest by Western public opinion. Both Western statesmen and the press dwelt on this event seriously. Although statesmen congratulated the Ottoman authorities on the proclamation of the Constitutional Monarchy as a matter of political courtesy, they did not refrain from analyzing at length what this development meant for their own countries. For countries like Britain and France, the proclamation of the Constitutional Monarchy was a positive development, while Russia and Germany openly expressed their concerns. Small Balkan countries such as Greece and Bulgaria were also skeptical of the Constitutional Monarchy, believing that it would harm their interests in Macedonia. The Western press, on the other hand, largely supported the Constitutional Monarchy, believing that it would pave the way for a new phase of development in the East. This study seeks to answer the question of how the Constitutional Monarchy was received by Western public opinion in the light of archival documents, especially press materials and copyrighted works.

 The declaration of the Constitutional Monarchy was followed with great interest by Western public opinion. Both Western statesmen and the press dwelt on this event seriously. Although statesmen congratulated the Ottoman authorities on the proclamation of the Constitutional Monarchy as a matter of political courtesy, they did not refrain from analyzing at length what this development meant for their own countries. For countries like Britain and France, the proclamation of the Constitutional Monarchy was a positive development, while Russia and Germany openly expressed their concerns. Small Balkan countries such as Greece and Bulgaria were also skeptical of the Constitutional Monarchy, believing that it would harm their interests in Macedonia. The Western press, on the other hand, largely supported the Constitutional Monarchy, believing that it would pave the way for a new phase of development in the East. This study seeks to answer the question of how the Constitutional Monarchy was received by Western public opinion in the light of archival documents, especially press materials and copyrighted works.

 II. Meşrutiyetin ilanı Batı kamuoyunda merakla takip edildi. Gerek Batılı devlet adamları gerekse basın bu olay üzerinde ciddiyetle durdu. Devlet adamları her ne kadar siyasi nezaket gereği Meşrutiyetin ilanından dolayı Osmanlı makamlarını tebrik etseler de bu gelişmenin kendi ülkeleri için yol açacakları vaziyeti uzun uzadıya analiz etmekten geri durmadılar. İngiltere ve Fransa gibi ülkeler için Meşrutiyetin ilanı olumlu bir gelişme olarak kabul edilirken, Rusya ve Almanya açıkça Meşrutiyetin ilanından duydukları endişeyi dile getirdiler. Yine Yunanistan ve Bulgaristan gibi küçük Balkan ülkeleri de Makedonyadaki çıkarlarına zarar vereceğini düşünerek Meşrutiyeti şüpheyle karşıladılar. Buna karşılık Batı basını ise büyük ölçüde Meşrutiyetin Doğuda yeni bir gelişme evresine sahne olacağı düşüncesiyle bu hareketi destekler bir tutum sergiledi. Bu çalışmada başta basın materyalleri olmak üzere arşiv belgeleri ve telif eserler ışığında II. Meşrutiyetin Batı kamuoyunda nasıl karşılandığı sorusuna cevap aranmaya çalışılmıştır.

Makale detayları

The Young Turk Revolution of 1908 and the Restoration of Constitutional Rule According to the Press Organs of the Great European Powers

Yazarlar:

Pir Murat Sivri

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Genel Türk Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi:

Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları Issue 45, pp.27-72

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324740

pISSN:

1304-9720

Second Constitutional Monarchy

Ottoman Empire

Britain

USA

Russia

France

Germany

PressII. Meşrutiyet

Osmanlı Devleti

İngiltere

ABD

Rusya

Fransa

Almanya

Basın

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Pir Murat Sivri

Yayıncı: Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar: Genel Türk Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi: Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları Issue 45, pp.27-72

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001324740

pISSN: 1304-9720

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Pir Murat Sivri

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Genel Türk Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi:

Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları Issue 45, pp.27-72

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324740

pISSN:

1304-9720