On Arche and the Concept of Substance: Thales, Anaximandros and Anaximenes

Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı; Fatma Güdücü

Makale detayları

On Arche and the Concept of Substance: Thales, Anaximandros and Anaximenes

Yazarlar:

Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı | Fatma Güdücü

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Dergi:

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Issue 57, pp.1-11

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281827

pISSN:

1300-9435

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this article, the views of Milesian philosophers on substance within the framework of their ontology are given. Accordingly, first of all, determinations about the origin and various meanings of the concept are given in order to explain why the concept of substance is handled in different ways in philosophical discussions. Based on these findings, it is revealed that the conclusions reached by Thales, Anaximandros and Anaximenes in their search for the first principle arche of everything can be accepted as substance and that their different substances refer to various features of the philosophical concept of substance. Ultimately, the aim to be reached in the article is to show that the Milesian philosophers understanding of substance is parallel to each other, but to reveal that the properties they attribute to substance differ, and that Anaximeness concept of substance is more inclusive than other thinkers at this point.

 In this article, the views of Milesian philosophers on substance within the framework of their ontology are given. Accordingly, first of all, determinations about the origin and various meanings of the concept are given in order to explain why the concept of substance is handled in different ways in philosophical discussions. Based on these findings, it is revealed that the conclusions reached by Thales, Anaximandros and Anaximenes in their search for the first principle arche of everything can be accepted as substance and that their different substances refer to various features of the philosophical concept of substance. Ultimately, the aim to be reached in the article is to show that the Milesian philosophers understanding of substance is parallel to each other, but to reveal that the properties they attribute to substance differ, and that Anaximeness concept of substance is more inclusive than other thinkers at this point.

 In this article, the views of Milesian philosophers on substance within the framework of their ontology are given. Accordingly, first of all, determinations about the origin and various meanings of the concept are given in order to explain why the concept of substance is handled in different ways in philosophical discussions. Based on these findings, it is revealed that the conclusions reached by Thales, Anaximandros and Anaximenes in their search for the first principle arche of everything can be accepted as substance and that their different substances refer to various features of the philosophical concept of substance. Ultimately, the aim to be reached in the article is to show that the Milesian philosophers understanding of substance is parallel to each other, but to reveal that the properties they attribute to substance differ, and that Anaximeness concept of substance is more inclusive than other thinkers at this point.

 Bu makalede, Milet Okulu doğa filozoflarının ontolojileri çerçevesinde töz hakkındaki görüşlerine yer verilmektedir. Buna göre, öncelikle, töz kavramının felsefi tartışmalarda neden farklı şekillerde ele alındığını açıklamak için kavramın kökeni ve çeşitli anlamlarına yönelik tespitler aktarılmaktadır. Bu tespitlerden hareketle, Thales, Anaximandros ve Anaximenesin her şeyin ilk ilkesi arkhe arayışında ulaştıkları sonuçların töz olarak kabul edilebileceği ve onların farklı nitelikte olan bu tözlerinin felsefi töz kavramının çeşitli özelliklerine atıfta bulunduğu ortaya konulmaktadır. Nihai olarak, makalenin amacı Miletli filozofların töze ilişkin kavrayışlarının birbirine paralel olduğunu, ancak töze atfettikleri özelliklerin farklılaştığını ve bu noktada Anaksimenesin töz kavrayışının diğer düşünürlere oranla daha kapsayıcı olduğunu ortaya koymaktır.

Makale detayları

On Arche and the Concept of Substance: Thales, Anaximandros and Anaximenes

Yazarlar:

Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı | Fatma Güdücü

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Dergi:

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Issue 57, pp.1-11

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281827

pISSN:

1300-9435

Arche

Substance

Attribute

Ontology

Milesian School

Arkhe

Töz

Nitelik

Ontoloji

Milet Okulu

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı | Fatma Güdücü

Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel University

Dergi: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Issue 57, pp.1-11

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001281827

pISSN: 1300-9435

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı | Fatma Güdücü

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Dergi:

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Issue 57, pp.1-11

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281827

pISSN:

1300-9435