Are Youtube Videos About Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsy Useful and Reliable?

Osman Konukoğlu; Veysel Kaya; Mehmet Tahtabaşı

Makale detayları

Are Youtube Videos About Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsy Useful and Reliable?

Yazarlar:

Osman Konukoğlu | Veysel Kaya | Mehmet Tahtabaşı

Yayıncı:

Harran University

Ana Başlıklar:

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri

Dergi:

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.377-383

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001293777

pISSN:

1304-9623

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness and quality of YouTube videos on ultrasound-guided breast biopsy UGBB for patients. Materials and Methods: A video search was undertaken on YouTube on Aug 14, 2020 using the keywords, breast biopsy, ultrasound-guided core biopsy, breast ultrasound, and breast biopsy ultrasound. Top 100 videos were selected using each keyword total 400 videos. After applying the exclusion criteria, 51 videos were evaluated by two researchers based on the patient information form of the American Cancer Society and American College of Radiology. According to these criteria, the videos were divided into four categories as very useful, useful, slightly useful, and not useful. Video parameters were compared between the groups by the KruskalWallis test. Results: Of the 51 videos analyzed, 13.7 n7 were very useful, and 41.2 n21 were useful. Of the very useful videos, 85.7 n6 had been uploaded by physicianshospitals. The DISCERN reliability score was significantly higher in very useful videos median: 4, range: 2-5, p  0.001. The length and number of likes and comments were significantly higher for the videos uploaded by civilian individuals p0.005, p0.046, and p0.013, respectively. Not useful and very useful videos were significantly longer p  0.01 Conclusion: Although the primary sources of high-quality and very useful YouTube videos about UGBB were physicianshospital, a significant portion of low-quality videos had also been uploaded by this group. Thus, medical professionals should take care to upload well-informed videos.

 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness and quality of YouTube videos on ultrasound-guided breast biopsy UGBB for patients. Materials and Methods: A video search was undertaken on YouTube on Aug 14, 2020 using the keywords, breast biopsy, ultrasound-guided core biopsy, breast ultrasound, and breast biopsy ultrasound. Top 100 videos were selected using each keyword total 400 videos. After applying the exclusion criteria, 51 videos were evaluated by two researchers based on the patient information form of the American Cancer Society and American College of Radiology. According to these criteria, the videos were divided into four categories as very useful, useful, slightly useful, and not useful. Video parameters were compared between the groups by the KruskalWallis test. Results: Of the 51 videos analyzed, 13.7 n7 were very useful, and 41.2 n21 were useful. Of the very useful videos, 85.7 n6 had been uploaded by physicianshospitals. The DISCERN reliability score was significantly higher in very useful videos median: 4, range: 2-5, p  0.001. The length and number of likes and comments were significantly higher for the videos uploaded by civilian individuals p0.005, p0.046, and p0.013, respectively. Not useful and very useful videos were significantly longer p  0.01 Conclusion: Although the primary sources of high-quality and very useful YouTube videos about UGBB were physicianshospital, a significant portion of low-quality videos had also been uploaded by this group. Thus, medical professionals should take care to upload well-informed videos.

 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness and quality of YouTube videos on ultrasound-guided breast biopsy UGBB for patients. Materials and Methods: A video search was undertaken on YouTube on Aug 14, 2020 using the keywords, breast biopsy, ultrasound-guided core biopsy, breast ultrasound, and breast biopsy ultrasound. Top 100 videos were selected using each keyword total 400 videos. After applying the exclusion criteria, 51 videos were evaluated by two researchers based on the patient information form of the American Cancer Society and American College of Radiology. According to these criteria, the videos were divided into four categories as very useful, useful, slightly useful, and not useful. Video parameters were compared between the groups by the KruskalWallis test. Results: Of the 51 videos analyzed, 13.7 n7 were very useful, and 41.2 n21 were useful. Of the very useful videos, 85.7 n6 had been uploaded by physicianshospitals. The DISCERN reliability score was significantly higher in very useful videos median: 4, range: 2-5, p  0.001. The length and number of likes and comments were significantly higher for the videos uploaded by civilian individuals p0.005, p0.046, and p0.013, respectively. Not useful and very useful videos were significantly longer p  0.01 Conclusion: Although the primary sources of high-quality and very useful YouTube videos about UGBB were physicianshospital, a significant portion of low-quality videos had also been uploaded by this group. Thus, medical professionals should take care to upload well-informed videos.

 Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı ultrason rehberliğinde yapılan meme biopsi ile ilgili YouTube videolarının hastalar için yararlılığını ve kalitesini değerlendirmektir. Materyal ve Metod: Breast biopsy, ultrasound-guided core biopsy, breast ultrasound ve breast biopsy ultrasound anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak 14 Ağustos 2020de YouTubeda video araması yapıldı. Arama sonuçlarındaki 400 video Amerikan Kanser Derneği ve Amerikan Radyoloji Derneğinin hasta bilgilendirme formu rehber alınarak iki bağımsız araştırmacı tarafından değerlendirildi. Bu kriterlere göre videolar çok faydalı, faydalı, az faydalı ve faydasız olmak üzere 4e ayrıldı. Bulgular: Analiz edilen toplam 51 videonun 13.7 n7si çok faydalı ve 41.2 n21si faydalı idi. Çok faydalı videoların 85.7 n6si doktorhastane tarafından yüklenmişti. Güvenililirliği gösteren DISCERN skoru çok faydalı videolarda anlamlı olarak yüksekti median: 4, aralık: 2-5, p  0.001. Siviller tarafından yüklenen videoların uzun-luğu, beğeni ve yorum sayısı anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti sırasıyla; p  0.005, p  0.046 ve p  0.013. Sonuç: Ultrason rehberliğinde meme biyopsi ile ilgili çok faydalı YouTube videolarının primer kaynağı dok-torhastane olsa da, az faydalı ve faydasız videoların önemli bir kısmının da bu grup tarafından yüklendiği tespit edildi. Bundan dolayı medikal profesyonellerin daha özenli ve donanımlı eğitim videoları yüklemeleri gerekmekte-dir.

Makale detayları

Are Youtube Videos About Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsy Useful and Reliable?

Yazarlar:

Osman Konukoğlu | Veysel Kaya | Mehmet Tahtabaşı

Yayıncı:

Harran University

Ana Başlıklar:

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri

Dergi:

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.377-383

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001293777

pISSN:

1304-9623

Breast biopsy

core needle

ultrasound-guided

patient information

YouTubeMeme biyopsi

Kalın iğne

Ultrason

hasta bilgilendirme

YouTube

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Osman Konukoğlu | Veysel Kaya | Mehmet Tahtabaşı

Yayıncı: Harran University

Ana Başlıklar: Klinik Tıp Bilimleri

Dergi: Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.377-383

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001293777

pISSN: 1304-9623

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Osman Konukoğlu | Veysel Kaya | Mehmet Tahtabaşı

Yayıncı:

Harran University

Ana Başlıklar:

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri

Dergi:

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 2, pp.377-383

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001293777

pISSN:

1304-9623