The Phenomenon of Qirāʾāt in Abū ʿUbayda's Majāz al-Qurʾān and the Effects on Tafsīr of  Benefited  Qirāʾāt Varieties in the Book

Muhammed Pilgir

Makale detayları

The Phenomenon of Qirāʾāt in Abū ʿUbayda's Majāz al-Qurʾān and the Effects on Tafsīr of Benefited Qirāʾāt Varieties in the Book

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.79-94

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294874

pISSN:

2148-3264

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this research, the qirāʾāt varieties in the work called Majāz al-Qurʾān, which was first written work on gharīb al-Qurʾān, were examined, and the effects of these varieties on tafsīr were explained with examples. In our study, through the method of scanning the work entirely, it has been seen that the words bearing the qirāʾāt varieties are not included enough in the work. It has been observed that the author is weak compared to his contemporaries, Ferrāʾ and Ahfash, especially in terms of dealing with qirāʾāt differences. At the same time, it has been observed that most of the qirāʾāt differences in the aforementioned work are not attributed to qirāʾāt. So much so that, as far as can be determined, only one of them was mentioned about six qirāʾāt; but it is unclear to whom this concept is attributed. Regarding another qirāʾāt variety, it has been observed that attribution to the people of Medina is in question. Thus, it is discovered that Abū Ubaydah has followed his teacher in the majority of the words that have qirāʾāt differences, besides the fact that the reference of these varieties has been observed to be his teacher Abū Amr only. Based on the aforementioned inferences, it was concluded that the qirāʾāt data acquired by someone who was a student of Abū ʿAmr was not sufficiently reflected in the subject work.

 In this research, the qirāʾāt varieties in the work called Majāz al-Qurʾān, which was first written work on gharīb al-Qurʾān, were examined, and the effects of these varieties on tafsīr were explained with examples. In our study, through the method of scanning the work entirely, it has been seen that the words bearing the qirāʾāt varieties are not included enough in the work. It has been observed that the author is weak compared to his contemporaries, Ferrāʾ and Ahfash, especially in terms of dealing with qirāʾāt differences. At the same time, it has been observed that most of the qirāʾāt differences in the aforementioned work are not attributed to qirāʾāt. So much so that, as far as can be determined, only one of them was mentioned about six qirāʾāt; but it is unclear to whom this concept is attributed. Regarding another qirāʾāt variety, it has been observed that attribution to the people of Medina is in question. Thus, it is discovered that Abū Ubaydah has followed his teacher in the majority of the words that have qirāʾāt differences, besides the fact that the reference of these varieties has been observed to be his teacher Abū Amr only. Based on the aforementioned inferences, it was concluded that the qirāʾāt data acquired by someone who was a student of Abū ʿAmr was not sufficiently reflected in the subject work.

 In this research, the qirāʾāt varieties in the work called Majāz al-Qurʾān, which was first written work on gharīb al-Qurʾān, were examined, and the effects of these varieties on tafsīr were explained with examples. In our study, through the method of scanning the work entirely, it has been seen that the words bearing the qirāʾāt varieties are not included enough in the work. It has been observed that the author is weak compared to his contemporaries, Ferrāʾ and Ahfash, especially in terms of dealing with qirāʾāt differences. At the same time, it has been observed that most of the qirāʾāt differences in the aforementioned work are not attributed to qirāʾāt. So much so that, as far as can be determined, only one of them was mentioned about six qirāʾāt; but it is unclear to whom this concept is attributed. Regarding another qirāʾāt variety, it has been observed that attribution to the people of Medina is in question. Thus, it is discovered that Abū Ubaydah has followed his teacher in the majority of the words that have qirāʾāt differences, besides the fact that the reference of these varieties has been observed to be his teacher Abū Amr only. Based on the aforementioned inferences, it was concluded that the qirāʾāt data acquired by someone who was a student of Abū ʿAmr was not sufficiently reflected in the subject work.

 Bu araştırmada, garîbül-Kurân üzerine ilk olarak kaleme alınan Mecâzül-Kurân adlı eserde geçen kıraat ihtilafları incelenmiş ve bu ihtilafların tefsire etkisi örneklerle anlatılmıştır. Çalışmamızda eser baştan sona taranmış ve bu tarama sonucunda mezkûr eserde kıraat ihtilafına konu olan kelimelere çok sık yer verilmediği görülmüştür. Özellikle kıraat ihtilaflarına temas edilmesi noktasında müellifin, muasırı olan Ferrâ ve Ahfeşe nazaran zayıf kaldığı müşahede edilmiştir. Aynı zamanda mezkûr eserde yer verilen kıraat ihtilaflarının çok büyük bir kısmının meşhur veya şâz kıraatlere isnadının söz konusu olmadığı gözlenmiştir. Öyle ki tespit edilebildiği kadarıyla bunlardan sadece biri hakkında altı kıraatten bahsedilmiş; fakat bu kavramın kime nispet edildiği müphem kalmıştır. Bir başka kıraat ihtilafı hakkında ise Medine ehline isnadın mevzubahis olduğu müşahede edilmiştir. Nitekim kıraat ihtilafı bulunan kelimelerde Ebû Ubeydenin, ekseriyetle hocasının kıraatini tercih ettiği tespit edilmiş ve bu ihtilaflara ait referansın sadece hocası Ebû Amr b. el-Alâ olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Zikredilen bulgulardan hareketle, Ebû Amra talebe olmuş birinin kıraat müktesebatının esere yeterince yansımadığı sonucu çıkarılmıştır.

Makale detayları

The Phenomenon of Qirāʾāt in Abū ʿUbayda's Majāz al-Qurʾān and the Effects on Tafsīr of Benefited Qirāʾāt Varieties in the Book

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.79-94

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294874

pISSN:

2148-3264

Qirāʾāt

Tafsīr

Linguistics

Gharīb al-Qurʾān

Majāz al-Qurʾān

Abū ʿUbaydaKıraat

Tefsir

Dil Bilimi

Garîbü’l-Kur’ân

Mecâzü’l-Kur’ân

Ebû ‘Ubeyde

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı: Mardin Artuklu University

Dergi: Artuklu Akademi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.79-94

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001294874

pISSN: 2148-3264

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Muhammed Pilgir

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.79-94

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001294874

pISSN:

2148-3264