Acquisitive Prescription/Adverse Possession: Turkish and Chinese Legal Systems

Dilara Buket Didin; Yongxin Luo

Makale detayları

Acquisitive Prescription/Adverse Possession: Turkish and Chinese Legal Systems

Yazarlar:

Dilara Buket Didin | Yongxin Luo

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Mülkiyet Hukuku (Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku hariç) | Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.227-265

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001339890

pISSN:

2149-5831

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 With the passage of time, sometimes a right is lost, sometimes a right is acquired, and sometimes an existing right is prevented from being brought to court. The role of time can be seen clearly in the prescription. In the article, the role of the time has been examined within the context of acquisitive prescriptionadverse possession. The scope of the article has been limited only to the acquisition of immovable property by prescription. The first chapter of the article examines the legal requirements and consequences of ordinary and extraordinary acquisitive prescription under Turkish law. The second chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and practice of the acquisitive prescription system in China, including mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao. First, the Qing She system in ancient China was examined. The second part of the chapter describes the development of mainland Chinas statute of acquisitive prescription in modern society. The third part is a study of the adverse possession in Hong Kong. The last part is concerned with the acquisitive prescription in Taiwan and Macao. The concluding chapter provides a comparative analysis to identify similarities and differences in how the examined jurisdictions solve similar problems and tries to find some common rationale between these systems.

 With the passage of time, sometimes a right is lost, sometimes a right is acquired, and sometimes an existing right is prevented from being brought to court. The role of time can be seen clearly in the prescription. In the article, the role of the time has been examined within the context of acquisitive prescriptionadverse possession. The scope of the article has been limited only to the acquisition of immovable property by prescription. The first chapter of the article examines the legal requirements and consequences of ordinary and extraordinary acquisitive prescription under Turkish law. The second chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and practice of the acquisitive prescription system in China, including mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao. First, the Qing She system in ancient China was examined. The second part of the chapter describes the development of mainland Chinas statute of acquisitive prescription in modern society. The third part is a study of the adverse possession in Hong Kong. The last part is concerned with the acquisitive prescription in Taiwan and Macao. The concluding chapter provides a comparative analysis to identify similarities and differences in how the examined jurisdictions solve similar problems and tries to find some common rationale between these systems.

 With the passage of time, sometimes a right is lost, sometimes a right is acquired, and sometimes an existing right is prevented from being brought to court. The role of time can be seen clearly in the prescription. In the article, the role of the time has been examined within the context of acquisitive prescriptionadverse possession. The scope of the article has been limited only to the acquisition of immovable property by prescription. The first chapter of the article examines the legal requirements and consequences of ordinary and extraordinary acquisitive prescription under Turkish law. The second chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and practice of the acquisitive prescription system in China, including mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao. First, the Qing She system in ancient China was examined. The second part of the chapter describes the development of mainland Chinas statute of acquisitive prescription in modern society. The third part is a study of the adverse possession in Hong Kong. The last part is concerned with the acquisitive prescription in Taiwan and Macao. The concluding chapter provides a comparative analysis to identify similarities and differences in how the examined jurisdictions solve similar problems and tries to find some common rationale between these systems.

 Zamanın geçmesiyle bazen bir hak kaybedilir, bazen bir hak kazanılır, bazen de var olan bir hakkın mahkemeye taşınması engellenir. Zamanın rolü, zamanaşımı sisteminde açıkça görülebilir. Makalede zamanın rolü kazandırıcı zamanaşımı bağlamında incelenmiştir. Makalenin kapsamı taşınmaz mülkiyetinin zamanaşımı ile kazanılması ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Makalenin ilk bölümünde, Türk hukukunda olağan ve olağanüstü kazandırıcı zamanaşımının hukuki koşulları ve sonuçları incelenmektedir. İkinci bölüm, Çin anakarası, Hong Kong, Tayvan ve Makao dahil olmak üzere Çindeki kazandırıcı zamanaşımı sisteminin evrimi ve uygulamasına ilişkin kapsamlı bir genel bakış sunmaktadır. İlk olarak, antik Çindeki Qing She sistemi incelenmiştir. Bölümün ikinci kısmında, Çin anakarasının modern toplumdaki kazandırıcı zamanaşımı sisteminin gelişimi anlatılmaktadır. Üçüncü bölümde, Hong Kongdaki zamanaşımı sistemi incelenmiştir. Son bölümde ise Tayvan ve Makaodaki kazandırıcı zamanaşımı sistemi ele alınmıştır. Sonuç bölümü, incelenen yargı sistemlerinin benzer sorunları çözme biçimlerindeki benzerlik ve farklılıkları belirleme ve bu sistemler arasında bazı ortak gerekçeler bulmak için karşılaştırmalı bir analiz yürütmektedir.

Makale detayları

Acquisitive Prescription/Adverse Possession: Turkish and Chinese Legal Systems

Yazarlar:

Dilara Buket Didin | Yongxin Luo

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Mülkiyet Hukuku (Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku hariç) | Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.227-265

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001339890

pISSN:

2149-5831

Prescription

Acquisitive Prescription

Possession

Immovable Property

Comparative Law.Zamanaşımı

Kazandırıcı Zamanaşımı

Zilyetlik

Taşınmaz

Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Dilara Buket Didin | Yongxin Luo

Yayıncı: Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar: Mülkiyet Hukuku (Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku hariç) | Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk

Dergi: Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.227-265

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2025

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001339890

pISSN: 2149-5831

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Dilara Buket Didin | Yongxin Luo

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Mülkiyet Hukuku (Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku hariç) | Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 1, pp.227-265

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001339890

pISSN:

2149-5831