Evaluation of the Components Affecting the Growth in Istanbul Mega-Region in the Historical Process with Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Mete Korhan Özkök; Azem Kuru

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Components Affecting the Growth in Istanbul Mega-Region in the Historical Process with Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Yazarlar:

Mete Korhan Özkök | Azem Kuru

Yayıncı:

Ahmet FİDAN

Ana Başlıklar:

Kentleşme Politikaları | Bölge Planlamada Kent Coğrafyası | Bölgesel Analiz ve Gelişme | Şehir ve Bölge Planlama

Dergi:

Kent Akademisi Vol.17 Issue 3, pp.887-915

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317450

pISSN:

2146-9229

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Today, economic activities have begun to lose their dependence on location with the development of transportation and communication technologies. Megaregions, which are characterized by different formations in the relationship between the core city and the periphery, have emerged because of this process, which is supported by the effects of globalization and central-local policies. The TR21 region, consisting of the provinces of Tekirdağ, Kırklareli and Edirne, and the TR42 region, consisting of the provinces of Kocaeli, Sakarya, Düzce, Bolu and Yalova, centered on the city of Istanbul, define a megaregion. This study aims to examine the formation process of the mega-region based on the decentralization of Istanbul and to reveal the factors affecting the urban growth process in the region through literature research and statistical inquiries. In this context, a total of 20 spatial, social, and economic components have been identified and hierarchical clustering, Spearman correlation and linear relationship investigation methods have been used to examine the post-2000 period in Istanbul and its neighborhood. The study revealed the socio-economic and spatial components affecting the clusters and agglomerations covering historical periods. In addition, it was determined that the urban growth processes of the sub-regions were driven by different components. One of the main findings of the study is that the decentralization processes observed in the entire Istanbul megaregion are supported by existing centrallocal government policies and planning decisions, but there is no core city-periphery cooperation in terms of socio-economic development with its immediate surroundings. It was found that in the model of relative centralization, the network of.

 Today, economic activities have begun to lose their dependence on location with the development of transportation and communication technologies. Megaregions, which are characterized by different formations in the relationship between the core city and the periphery, have emerged because of this process, which is supported by the effects of globalization and central-local policies. The TR21 region, consisting of the provinces of Tekirdağ, Kırklareli and Edirne, and the TR42 region, consisting of the provinces of Kocaeli, Sakarya, Düzce, Bolu and Yalova, centered on the city of Istanbul, define a megaregion. This study aims to examine the formation process of the mega-region based on the decentralization of Istanbul and to reveal the factors affecting the urban growth process in the region through literature research and statistical inquiries. In this context, a total of 20 spatial, social, and economic components have been identified and hierarchical clustering, Spearman correlation and linear relationship investigation methods have been used to examine the post-2000 period in Istanbul and its neighborhood. The study revealed the socio-economic and spatial components affecting the clusters and agglomerations covering historical periods. In addition, it was determined that the urban growth processes of the sub-regions were driven by different components. One of the main findings of the study is that the decentralization processes observed in the entire Istanbul megaregion are supported by existing centrallocal government policies and planning decisions, but there is no core city-periphery cooperation in terms of socio-economic development with its immediate surroundings. It was found that in the model of relative centralization, the network of.

 Today, economic activities have begun to lose their dependence on location with the development of transportation and communication technologies. Megaregions, which are characterized by different formations in the relationship between the core city and the periphery, have emerged because of this process, which is supported by the effects of globalization and central-local policies. The TR21 region, consisting of the provinces of Tekirdağ, Kırklareli and Edirne, and the TR42 region, consisting of the provinces of Kocaeli, Sakarya, Düzce, Bolu and Yalova, centered on the city of Istanbul, define a megaregion. This study aims to examine the formation process of the mega-region based on the decentralization of Istanbul and to reveal the factors affecting the urban growth process in the region through literature research and statistical inquiries. In this context, a total of 20 spatial, social, and economic components have been identified and hierarchical clustering, Spearman correlation and linear relationship investigation methods have been used to examine the post-2000 period in Istanbul and its neighborhood. The study revealed the socio-economic and spatial components affecting the clusters and agglomerations covering historical periods. In addition, it was determined that the urban growth processes of the sub-regions were driven by different components. One of the main findings of the study is that the decentralization processes observed in the entire Istanbul megaregion are supported by existing centrallocal government policies and planning decisions, but there is no core city-periphery cooperation in terms of socio-economic development with its immediate surroundings. It was found that in the model of relative centralization, the network of.

 Günümüzde ulaşım-iletişim teknolojilerindeki gelişme ile ekonomik aktiviteler mekâna olan bağımlılığını kaybetmeye başlamıştır. Küreselleşme etkileri ve merkeziyerel politikalar ile desteklenen bu süreç neticesinde çekirdek kent-periferi ilişkisinde farklı formasyonlar ile biçimlenen mega-bölgeler oluşmaya başlamıştır. İstanbul ili merkezliğinde Tekirdağ, Kırklareli, Edirne illerinden oluşan TR21 bölgesi ve Kocaeli, Sakarya, Düzce, Bolu, Yalova illerinden oluşan TR42 bölgesi bu açıdan bir mega-bölgeyi tariflemektedir. Bu çalışma ile İstanbulun desantralizasyonu temelinde mega-bölgenin oluşum sürecin irdelenmesi ve bölgede gerçekleşen kentsel büyüme sürecine etki eden unsurların literatür araştırmaları ve istatistiksel sorgulamalarla ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda mekânsal, sosyal ve ekonomik başlıklarında 20 bileşen belirlenmiş, hiyerarşik kümelenme, Spearman korelasyonu ve doğrusal, ilişki sorgulaması yöntemleri kullanılarak, İstanbul ve yakın çevresinde 2000 yılı sonrası için incelemeler yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda tarihi dönemleri kapsayan kümeler ve yığılımları etkileyen sosyo-ekonomik ve mekânsal bileşenler ortaya konmuştur. Bununla beraber alt bölgelerin kentsel büyüme süreçlerinin farklı bileşenler etkisinde gerçekleştiği belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın temel sonuçlarından bir diğeri ise İstanbul mega-bölgesi bütününde görülen desantralizasyon süreçlerinin mevcut merkeziyerel yönetim politikaları ve plan kararları ile desteklendiği ancak yakın çevresi ile sosyo-ekonomik gelişim açısından çekirdek kent-perifer iş birliğinin olmadığı görülmüştür. Oluşan ilişki ağının Göreli relative Merkezileşme modelinde Gelişimini Destekleyen -Rezerv- ve İstenmeyeni Depolayan -Tampon- Bölge amacını taşıyan birliktelik olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları benzer mega-bölge oluşum süreçlerinin yönlendirilmesine katkı sunabilir.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Components Affecting the Growth in Istanbul Mega-Region in the Historical Process with Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Yazarlar:

Mete Korhan Özkök | Azem Kuru

Yayıncı:

Ahmet FİDAN

Ana Başlıklar:

Kentleşme Politikaları | Bölge Planlamada Kent Coğrafyası | Bölgesel Analiz ve Gelişme | Şehir ve Bölge Planlama

Dergi:

Kent Akademisi Vol.17 Issue 3, pp.887-915

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317450

pISSN:

2146-9229

Mega-Region

Decentralization

Urban Growth

Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

IstanbulMega-Bölge

Desantralizasyon

Kentsel Büyüme

Hiyerarşik Kümelenme Analizi

İstanbul

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mete Korhan Özkök | Azem Kuru

Yayıncı: Ahmet FİDAN

Ana Başlıklar: Kentleşme Politikaları | Bölge Planlamada Kent Coğrafyası | Bölgesel Analiz ve Gelişme | Şehir ve Bölge Planlama

Dergi: Kent Akademisi Vol.17 Issue 3, pp.887-915

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001317450

pISSN: 2146-9229

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mete Korhan Özkök | Azem Kuru

Yayıncı:

Ahmet FİDAN

Ana Başlıklar:

Kentleşme Politikaları | Bölge Planlamada Kent Coğrafyası | Bölgesel Analiz ve Gelişme | Şehir ve Bölge Planlama

Dergi:

Kent Akademisi Vol.17 Issue 3, pp.887-915

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317450

pISSN:

2146-9229