COMPARISON OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS IN CONICAL, CYLINDRICAL, AND PASSIVELY INSERTED PRESS-FIT DENTAL IMPLANTS DURING THE FIRST 3 MONTHS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION

Çiğdem Karaca

Makale detayları

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS IN CONICAL, CYLINDRICAL, AND PASSIVELY INSERTED PRESS-FIT DENTAL IMPLANTS DURING THE FIRST 3 MONTHS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION

Yazarlar:

Çiğdem Karaca

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Dergi:

Clinical Dentistry and Research Vol.49 Issue 1, pp.19-25

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345804

pISSN:

2146-3972

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Background and Aim: This study investigated the effects of implant macrodesign on early marginal bone loss MBL, a key predictor of implant longevity. Materials and Methods: The MBL values of Bego Semandos Group I: conical, Straumann BL  SLA modified surface Group II: cylindrical, and I-System Group III: press-fit implants were measured on postoperative 3 months cone beam computed tomographic images at 6 points of each implant. The total MBL for each implant was calculated by averaging MBL at 6 points. The buccal and lingual MBL values were determined by averaging the measurements at 3 points on each side. Results: A total of 57 implants were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in the average total MBL values between groups p0.05. The cylindrical implants showed significantly higher buccal MBL 0.30  0.22 mm than lingual MBL 0.17  0.37 mm p0.048. The conical and cylindrical implants exhibited insignificantly higher total MBL in the maxilla and mandible, respectively p0.05. Conical implants had an insignificantly higher total MBL in the anterior region than that in the posterior region p0.05. Conclusions: Cylindrical implants may be avoided in alveolar crests with higher buccal resorption, to prevent early buccal MBL. Cylindrical and conical implant placements should be preferred in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, with proper countersinking. Cylindrical implants may minimize the early MBL in the anterior region. Although implant macrodesigns do not significantly differ in average total MBL levels, passive pressfit implants may ensure more homogeneous early MBL across both jaws and regions.

 Background and Aim: This study investigated the effects of implant macrodesign on early marginal bone loss MBL, a key predictor of implant longevity. Materials and Methods: The MBL values of Bego Semandos Group I: conical, Straumann BL  SLA modified surface Group II: cylindrical, and I-System Group III: press-fit implants were measured on postoperative 3 months cone beam computed tomographic images at 6 points of each implant. The total MBL for each implant was calculated by averaging MBL at 6 points. The buccal and lingual MBL values were determined by averaging the measurements at 3 points on each side. Results: A total of 57 implants were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in the average total MBL values between groups p0.05. The cylindrical implants showed significantly higher buccal MBL 0.30  0.22 mm than lingual MBL 0.17  0.37 mm p0.048. The conical and cylindrical implants exhibited insignificantly higher total MBL in the maxilla and mandible, respectively p0.05. Conical implants had an insignificantly higher total MBL in the anterior region than that in the posterior region p0.05. Conclusions: Cylindrical implants may be avoided in alveolar crests with higher buccal resorption, to prevent early buccal MBL. Cylindrical and conical implant placements should be preferred in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, with proper countersinking. Cylindrical implants may minimize the early MBL in the anterior region. Although implant macrodesigns do not significantly differ in average total MBL levels, passive pressfit implants may ensure more homogeneous early MBL across both jaws and regions.

 Background and Aim: This study investigated the effects of implant macrodesign on early marginal bone loss MBL, a key predictor of implant longevity. Materials and Methods: The MBL values of Bego Semandos Group I: conical, Straumann BL  SLA modified surface Group II: cylindrical, and I-System Group III: press-fit implants were measured on postoperative 3 months cone beam computed tomographic images at 6 points of each implant. The total MBL for each implant was calculated by averaging MBL at 6 points. The buccal and lingual MBL values were determined by averaging the measurements at 3 points on each side. Results: A total of 57 implants were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in the average total MBL values between groups p0.05. The cylindrical implants showed significantly higher buccal MBL 0.30  0.22 mm than lingual MBL 0.17  0.37 mm p0.048. The conical and cylindrical implants exhibited insignificantly higher total MBL in the maxilla and mandible, respectively p0.05. Conical implants had an insignificantly higher total MBL in the anterior region than that in the posterior region p0.05. Conclusions: Cylindrical implants may be avoided in alveolar crests with higher buccal resorption, to prevent early buccal MBL. Cylindrical and conical implant placements should be preferred in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, with proper countersinking. Cylindrical implants may minimize the early MBL in the anterior region. Although implant macrodesigns do not significantly differ in average total MBL levels, passive pressfit implants may ensure more homogeneous early MBL across both jaws and regions.

 Background and Aim: This study investigated the effects of implant macrodesign on early marginal bone loss MBL, a key predictor of implant longevity. Materials and Methods: The MBL values of Bego Semandos Group I: conical, Straumann BL  SLA modified surface Group II: cylindrical, and I-System Group III: press-fit implants were measured on postoperative 3 months cone beam computed tomographic images at 6 points of each implant. The total MBL for each implant was calculated by averaging MBL at 6 points. The buccal and lingual MBL values were determined by averaging the measurements at 3 points on each side. Results: A total of 57 implants were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in the average total MBL values between groups p0.05. The cylindrical implants showed significantly higher buccal MBL 0.30  0.22 mm than lingual MBL 0.17  0.37 mm p0.048. The conical and cylindrical implants exhibited insignificantly higher total MBL in the maxilla and mandible, respectively p0.05. Conical implants had an insignificantly higher total MBL in the anterior region than that in the posterior region p0.05. Conclusions: Cylindrical implants may be avoided in alveolar crests with higher buccal resorption, to prevent early buccal MBL. Cylindrical and conical implant placements should be preferred in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, with proper countersinking. Cylindrical implants may minimize the early MBL in the anterior region. Although implant macrodesigns do not significantly differ in average total MBL levels, passive pressfit implants may ensure more homogeneous early MBL across both jaws and regions.

Makale detayları

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS IN CONICAL, CYLINDRICAL, AND PASSIVELY INSERTED PRESS-FIT DENTAL IMPLANTS DURING THE FIRST 3 MONTHS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION

Yazarlar:

Çiğdem Karaca

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Dergi:

Clinical Dentistry and Research Vol.49 Issue 1, pp.19-25

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345804

pISSN:

2146-3972

Bone Resorption

Dental Implant

Macrodesign

Marginal Bone Loss

Osseointegration.

Sayı

Makale detayları

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS IN CONICAL, CYLINDRICAL, AND PASSIVELY INSERTED PRESS-FIT DENTAL IMPLANTS DURING THE FIRST 3 MONTHS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION

Yazarlar: Çiğdem Karaca

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Dergi: Clinical Dentistry and Research Vol.49 Issue 1, pp.19-25

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2025

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001345804

pISSN: 2146-3972

Bone Resorption

Dental Implant

Macrodesign

Marginal Bone Loss

Osseointegration.

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Çiğdem Karaca

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Dergi:

Clinical Dentistry and Research Vol.49 Issue 1, pp.19-25

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345804

pISSN:

2146-3972