Relationship between pelvic floor complaints and multicompartment prolapsus

Tansu Altıntaş; Çiğdem Arslan

Makale detayları

Relationship between pelvic floor complaints and multicompartment prolapsus

Yazarlar:

Tansu Altıntaş | Çiğdem Arslan

Yayıncı:

MediHealth Academy Yayıncılık

Ana Başlıklar:

Genel Cerrahi

Dergi:

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine Vol.7 Issue 3, pp.337-340

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001318128

pISSN:

2636-8579

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and characteristics of multi-compartment prolapse in women evaluated with pelvic floor complaints. Methods: The data of 259 patients who applied to our hospital with pelvic floor complaints between May 2022 and March 2023 were evaluated retrospectively, and after the exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining 69 patients were included. Patients were grouped according to their primary complaints as those presenting with anterior compartment symptoms ACS, those presenting with middle compartment symptoms MCS, those presenting with posterior compartment symptoms PCS, those presenting with proctological symptoms PS and those presenting with chronic pelvic pain CPP. Results: A total of 69 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49.813.1 years and the median symptom duration was 60 months. When patients are evaluated in terms of main complaint; The primary complaint was ACS in 16 patients, MCS in 4 patients, PCS in 26 patients, PS in 20 patients, and CPP in 3 patients. According to MRI defecography findings, ACS was detected in 1 patients, MCS in 1 patients, PCS in 13 patients and multicompartment prolapse in 54 patients. In patients with a history of vaginal delivery, in patients with a history of previous pelvic surgery and as the number of vaginal delivery increases multi-compartment prolapse rate was significantly increased. Conclusion: Regardless of the underlying primary complaint, the presence of multicompartment prolapse should be investigated through examination and tests in pelvic floor diseases. History and number of vaginal deliveries, previous pelvic surgery history carry a higher risk for multi-compartment prolapse.

 Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and characteristics of multi-compartment prolapse in women evaluated with pelvic floor complaints. Methods: The data of 259 patients who applied to our hospital with pelvic floor complaints between May 2022 and March 2023 were evaluated retrospectively, and after the exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining 69 patients were included. Patients were grouped according to their primary complaints as those presenting with anterior compartment symptoms ACS, those presenting with middle compartment symptoms MCS, those presenting with posterior compartment symptoms PCS, those presenting with proctological symptoms PS and those presenting with chronic pelvic pain CPP. Results: A total of 69 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49.813.1 years and the median symptom duration was 60 months. When patients are evaluated in terms of main complaint; The primary complaint was ACS in 16 patients, MCS in 4 patients, PCS in 26 patients, PS in 20 patients, and CPP in 3 patients. According to MRI defecography findings, ACS was detected in 1 patients, MCS in 1 patients, PCS in 13 patients and multicompartment prolapse in 54 patients. In patients with a history of vaginal delivery, in patients with a history of previous pelvic surgery and as the number of vaginal delivery increases multi-compartment prolapse rate was significantly increased. Conclusion: Regardless of the underlying primary complaint, the presence of multicompartment prolapse should be investigated through examination and tests in pelvic floor diseases. History and number of vaginal deliveries, previous pelvic surgery history carry a higher risk for multi-compartment prolapse.

 Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and characteristics of multi-compartment prolapse in women evaluated with pelvic floor complaints. Methods: The data of 259 patients who applied to our hospital with pelvic floor complaints between May 2022 and March 2023 were evaluated retrospectively, and after the exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining 69 patients were included. Patients were grouped according to their primary complaints as those presenting with anterior compartment symptoms ACS, those presenting with middle compartment symptoms MCS, those presenting with posterior compartment symptoms PCS, those presenting with proctological symptoms PS and those presenting with chronic pelvic pain CPP. Results: A total of 69 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49.813.1 years and the median symptom duration was 60 months. When patients are evaluated in terms of main complaint; The primary complaint was ACS in 16 patients, MCS in 4 patients, PCS in 26 patients, PS in 20 patients, and CPP in 3 patients. According to MRI defecography findings, ACS was detected in 1 patients, MCS in 1 patients, PCS in 13 patients and multicompartment prolapse in 54 patients. In patients with a history of vaginal delivery, in patients with a history of previous pelvic surgery and as the number of vaginal delivery increases multi-compartment prolapse rate was significantly increased. Conclusion: Regardless of the underlying primary complaint, the presence of multicompartment prolapse should be investigated through examination and tests in pelvic floor diseases. History and number of vaginal deliveries, previous pelvic surgery history carry a higher risk for multi-compartment prolapse.

 Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and characteristics of multi-compartment prolapse in women evaluated with pelvic floor complaints. Methods: The data of 259 patients who applied to our hospital with pelvic floor complaints between May 2022 and March 2023 were evaluated retrospectively, and after the exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining 69 patients were included. Patients were grouped according to their primary complaints as those presenting with anterior compartment symptoms ACS, those presenting with middle compartment symptoms MCS, those presenting with posterior compartment symptoms PCS, those presenting with proctological symptoms PS and those presenting with chronic pelvic pain CPP. Results: A total of 69 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49.813.1 years and the median symptom duration was 60 months. When patients are evaluated in terms of main complaint; The primary complaint was ACS in 16 patients, MCS in 4 patients, PCS in 26 patients, PS in 20 patients, and CPP in 3 patients. According to MRI defecography findings, ACS was detected in 1 patients, MCS in 1 patients, PCS in 13 patients and multicompartment prolapse in 54 patients. In patients with a history of vaginal delivery, in patients with a history of previous pelvic surgery and as the number of vaginal delivery increases multi-compartment prolapse rate was significantly increased. Conclusion: Regardless of the underlying primary complaint, the presence of multicompartment prolapse should be investigated through examination and tests in pelvic floor diseases. History and number of vaginal deliveries, previous pelvic surgery history carry a higher risk for multi-compartment prolapse.

Makale detayları

Relationship between pelvic floor complaints and multicompartment prolapsus

Yazarlar:

Tansu Altıntaş | Çiğdem Arslan

Yayıncı:

MediHealth Academy Yayıncılık

Ana Başlıklar:

Genel Cerrahi

Dergi:

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine Vol.7 Issue 3, pp.337-340

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001318128

pISSN:

2636-8579

Pelvic floor

multi-compartment prolapse

pelvic organ prolapse

MRI defecography

rectocele

rectal prolapse

uterovaginal prolapse

cystocele

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Tansu Altıntaş | Çiğdem Arslan

Yayıncı: MediHealth Academy Yayıncılık

Ana Başlıklar: Genel Cerrahi

Dergi: Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine Vol.7 Issue 3, pp.337-340

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001318128

pISSN: 2636-8579

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Tansu Altıntaş | Çiğdem Arslan

Yayıncı:

MediHealth Academy Yayıncılık

Ana Başlıklar:

Genel Cerrahi

Dergi:

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine Vol.7 Issue 3, pp.337-340

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001318128

pISSN:

2636-8579