The Nature and Arbitrariness of Discretion in Hanafi Doctrine

Canan Kösetürk Baş

Makale detayları

The Nature and Arbitrariness of Discretion in Hanafi Doctrine

Yazarlar:

Canan Kösetürk Baş

Yayıncı:

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 56, pp.39-65

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321500

pISSN:

2587-1854

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this study, the nature of the principle of discretion in the Hanafi doctrine, which means to act with the most reliable and strong angle in the solution of matters in which verdicts can be reached against or in favor to free the obligant from responsibility as much as possible, has been addressed. In this context, based on the definitions made by the Hanafi canonists regarding the concept, answers to the questions of what discretion means, why it is utilized, and when and where the action was taken with discretion were first sought. Then, by determining the discretionary judgments made in the Hanafi sect and the methods and rules that led to reaching these judgments, it was attempted to reveal how action was taken with the principle of discretion in the doctrine. Accordingly, it was found that certain rules were considered while making a discretionary judgment and that the principle of discretion was closely associated with ancillary evidence such as istihsân, istishâb, and sedd-i zerâyi.

 In this study, the nature of the principle of discretion in the Hanafi doctrine, which means to act with the most reliable and strong angle in the solution of matters in which verdicts can be reached against or in favor to free the obligant from responsibility as much as possible, has been addressed. In this context, based on the definitions made by the Hanafi canonists regarding the concept, answers to the questions of what discretion means, why it is utilized, and when and where the action was taken with discretion were first sought. Then, by determining the discretionary judgments made in the Hanafi sect and the methods and rules that led to reaching these judgments, it was attempted to reveal how action was taken with the principle of discretion in the doctrine. Accordingly, it was found that certain rules were considered while making a discretionary judgment and that the principle of discretion was closely associated with ancillary evidence such as istihsân, istishâb, and sedd-i zerâyi.

 In this study, the nature of the principle of discretion in the Hanafi doctrine, which means to act with the most reliable and strong angle in the solution of matters in which verdicts can be reached against or in favor to free the obligant from responsibility as much as possible, has been addressed. In this context, based on the definitions made by the Hanafi canonists regarding the concept, answers to the questions of what discretion means, why it is utilized, and when and where the action was taken with discretion were first sought. Then, by determining the discretionary judgments made in the Hanafi sect and the methods and rules that led to reaching these judgments, it was attempted to reveal how action was taken with the principle of discretion in the doctrine. Accordingly, it was found that certain rules were considered while making a discretionary judgment and that the principle of discretion was closely associated with ancillary evidence such as istihsân, istishâb, and sedd-i zerâyi.

 Bu çalışmada, lehte de aleyhte de hüküm verilmesi mümkün olan meselelerin çözümünde mükellefi sorumluluktan büyük ölçüde kurtarmak gayesiyle en güvenilir ve en kuvvetli olan vecih ile amel etmek demek olan ihtiyat ilkesinin Hanefî doktrinindeki mahiyeti ve bu ilke ile nasıl amel edildiği konusu ele alınmıştır. Bu minvalde öncelikle Hanefî fakîhlerin kavramla ilgili tariflerinden hareketle doktrinde ihtiyatın ne ifade ettiği; niçin kendisine başvurulduğu; ne zaman ve nerede ihtiyatla amel edildiği sorularına cevap aranmıştır. Daha sonra Hanefî mezhebinde ihtiyaten verilen hükümler ve bu hükümlere ulaştıran yol - yöntem ve kâideler tespit edilerek doktrinde ihtiyat ilkesiyle nasıl amel edildiği ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmıştır. Buna göre ihtiyaten hüküm verilirken birtakım kâidelere dayanıldığı ve ihtiyatın istihsân, istishâb ve sedd-i zerâyi gibi ferî delillerle yakın ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür.

Makale detayları

The Nature and Arbitrariness of Discretion in Hanafi Doctrine

Yazarlar:

Canan Kösetürk Baş

Yayıncı:

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 56, pp.39-65

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321500

pISSN:

2587-1854

Discretion

İstishâb

İstihsân (juristic preference)

Hanafiİhtiyat

İstishâb

İstihsân

Hanefî

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Canan Kösetürk Baş

Yayıncı: Ondokuz Mayıs University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 56, pp.39-65

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321500

pISSN: 2587-1854

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Canan Kösetürk Baş

Yayıncı:

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Issue 56, pp.39-65

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321500

pISSN:

2587-1854