The Critique of the Opinion Claiming That Allah Does Not Know Beforehand the Willing Acts of the Slaves in Terms of the Science of Tafsir

Fatih Çelikel

Makale detayları

The Critique of the Opinion Claiming That Allah Does Not Know Beforehand the Willing Acts of the Slaves in Terms of the Science of Tafsir

Yazarlar:

Fatih Çelikel

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din Araştırmaları

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.150-166

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289868

pISSN:

2528-9861

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 There are some verses in the Quran that can be understood at first glance to mean that Allah Almighty knew certain things afterwards. Based on such verses, it has been claimed that Allah Almighty knew the voluntary acts of the slaves afterwards. This view, whose historical origin goes back to Cehmiyya, is defended by Abdülaziz Bayındır today. Adopting an approach that understands and explains the verses he refers to as the main reference on the subject, Abdülaziz Bayındır argues that the thirty-first verse of the chapter of Muhammad and other verses with a similar notion indicate that Allah does not know beforehand the optional actions of His servants. In this study, the rational and narrative evidences that Bayındır presented as a justification for his views were examined within the framework of the basic procedural principles of the science of tafsir. In our study, the method of analysis and criticism has been adopted. While interpreting the verses that Bayındır examined as a basis for his thesis, the method he put forward was verified through different verses, and it was seen that this method did not offer an accurate and authentic methodology of understanding and interpretation. It has been seen that the verses that Bayındır put forward as a basis for his thesis do not indicate that Allah knows the voluntary actions of the servants afterwards, but that he reveals what he knows in his pre-eternal knowledge.

 There are some verses in the Quran that can be understood at first glance to mean that Allah Almighty knew certain things afterwards. Based on such verses, it has been claimed that Allah Almighty knew the voluntary acts of the slaves afterwards. This view, whose historical origin goes back to Cehmiyya, is defended by Abdülaziz Bayındır today. Adopting an approach that understands and explains the verses he refers to as the main reference on the subject, Abdülaziz Bayındır argues that the thirty-first verse of the chapter of Muhammad and other verses with a similar notion indicate that Allah does not know beforehand the optional actions of His servants. In this study, the rational and narrative evidences that Bayındır presented as a justification for his views were examined within the framework of the basic procedural principles of the science of tafsir. In our study, the method of analysis and criticism has been adopted. While interpreting the verses that Bayındır examined as a basis for his thesis, the method he put forward was verified through different verses, and it was seen that this method did not offer an accurate and authentic methodology of understanding and interpretation. It has been seen that the verses that Bayındır put forward as a basis for his thesis do not indicate that Allah knows the voluntary actions of the servants afterwards, but that he reveals what he knows in his pre-eternal knowledge.

 There are some verses in the Quran that can be understood at first glance to mean that Allah Almighty knew certain things afterwards. Based on such verses, it has been claimed that Allah Almighty knew the voluntary acts of the slaves afterwards. This view, whose historical origin goes back to Cehmiyya, is defended by Abdülaziz Bayındır today. Adopting an approach that understands and explains the verses he refers to as the main reference on the subject, Abdülaziz Bayındır argues that the thirty-first verse of the chapter of Muhammad and other verses with a similar notion indicate that Allah does not know beforehand the optional actions of His servants. In this study, the rational and narrative evidences that Bayındır presented as a justification for his views were examined within the framework of the basic procedural principles of the science of tafsir. In our study, the method of analysis and criticism has been adopted. While interpreting the verses that Bayındır examined as a basis for his thesis, the method he put forward was verified through different verses, and it was seen that this method did not offer an accurate and authentic methodology of understanding and interpretation. It has been seen that the verses that Bayındır put forward as a basis for his thesis do not indicate that Allah knows the voluntary actions of the servants afterwards, but that he reveals what he knows in his pre-eternal knowledge.

 Kurân-ı Kerimdeki bazı ayetler ilk bakışta Cenâb-ı Hakkın bir takım şeyleri sonradan bilmekte olduğu şeklinde anlaşılabilecek yapıdadır. Bu gibi ayetlerden hareketle Cenâb-ı Hakkın kulların irâdî fiillerini sonradan bildiği öne sürülmüştür. Tarihi kökeni Cehmiyyeye kadar uzanan bu görüş günümüzde Abdülaziz Bayındır tarafından savunulmaktadır. Konuyla ilgili temel referans olarak gösterdiği ayetleri zahiri anlamları üzerinden anlayan ve açıklayan bir yaklaşımı benimseyen Abdülaziz Bayındır, başta Muhammed sûresinin otuz birinci ayeti ile benzer mefhumdaki diğer ayetlerin Allahın kulların ihtiyârî fiillerini önceden bilmediğine delâlet ettiğini öne sürmektedir. Bu çalışmada tefsir ilminin temel usûl kaideleri çerçevesinde Bayındırın görüşlerine gerekçe olarak sunduğu aklî ve naklî deliller incelenmiştir. Çalışmamızda tahlîl ve eleştiri yöntemi benimsenmiştir. Bayındırın tezine dayanak olarak incelediği ayetleri yorumlarken ortaya koyduğu usûlün farklı ayetler üzerinden sağlaması yapılmış, bu usûlün isabetli ve sahih bir anlama ve yorumlama metodolojisi sunmadığı görülmüştür. Bayındırın tezine dayanak olarak öne sürdüğü ayetlerin Allahın kulların irâdî fiillerini sonradan bildiğine değil, ezelî ilminde bildiği şeyleri ortaya çıkarmasına delâlet ettiği görülmüştür.

Makale detayları

The Critique of the Opinion Claiming That Allah Does Not Know Beforehand the Willing Acts of the Slaves in Terms of the Science of Tafsir

Yazarlar:

Fatih Çelikel

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din Araştırmaları

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.150-166

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289868

pISSN:

2528-9861

Tafsīr

Allah

Knowledge

Destiny

Unseen.Tefsir

Allah

İlim

Kader

Gayb.

Tafsir

Knowledge

Destiny

Unseen

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Fatih Çelikel

Yayıncı: Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar: Din Araştırmaları

Dergi: Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.150-166

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001289868

pISSN: 2528-9861

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Fatih Çelikel

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din Araştırmaları

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.150-166

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289868

pISSN:

2528-9861