YARGITAY’IN 12.11.2021 TARİHLİ VE 2020/2 E., 2021/3 K. SAYILI İÇTİHADI BİRLEŞTİRME BÜYÜK GENEL KURULU KARARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE KOOPERATİFLERİN TACİR NİTELİĞİ

Sema AYDIN; Hasan Ali KAPLAN

Makale detayları

YARGITAY’IN 12.11.2021 TARİHLİ VE 2020/2 E., 2021/3 K. SAYILI İÇTİHADI BİRLEŞTİRME BÜYÜK GENEL KURULU KARARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE KOOPERATİFLERİN TACİR NİTELİĞİ

Yazarlar:

Sema AYDIN | Hasan Ali KAPLAN

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Law Faculty Journal of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University 2022 Vol.3 Issue 1, pp.193-216

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2022

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000647449

Sıklık:

İki Yıllık

eISSN:

2757-6752

pISSN:

2717-9621

Özet:

 


In this article, the merchant nature of cooperatives will be examined within the framework of the Supreme Court's Decision of the Grand General Assembly to Unify the Jurisprudence dated 12.11.2021 and numbered 2020/2 E., 2021/3 K. Whether cooperatives can be considered merchants or not has been discussed in various aspects in doctrine and practice for years. The emergence of the debates on the legal nature of cooperatives dates back to before the Cooperatives Law No. 1163 dated 1969 came into force. As a matter of fact, there is also a decision to merge the jurisprudence made in 1945, which concluded that cooperatives are in the nature of trading companies and merchants. Despite cooperatives are regulated as commercial companies, although they are referred as “partnership” in the Cooperatives Law, as it is not explicitly stated that they are commercial in nature, there have been differences of opinion in doctrine and in court decisions on whether they are committed to earning and sharing profits, and whether it is appropriate to apply the results of trading and being a trader to cooperatives. Due to the differences of opinion and different practices between the jurisprudence of the Court, the decision of the Grand General Assembly to Unify the Jurisprudence dated 2021 was taken. The aforementioned decision will be evaluated within the framework of legal provisions and scientific opinions, taking into account the opinions of the relevant authorities and the dissenting vote.

.

Makale detayları

YARGITAY’IN 12.11.2021 TARİHLİ VE 2020/2 E., 2021/3 K. SAYILI İÇTİHADI BİRLEŞTİRME BÜYÜK GENEL KURULU KARARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE KOOPERATİFLERİN TACİR NİTELİĞİ

Yazarlar: Sema AYDIN | Hasan Ali KAPLAN

Yayıncı: Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Law Faculty Journal of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University 2022 Vol.3 Issue 1, pp.193-216

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2022

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2000647449

Sıklık: İki Yıllık

eISSN: 2757-6752

pISSN: 2717-9621

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sema AYDIN | Hasan Ali KAPLAN

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Law Faculty Journal of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University 2022 Vol.3 Issue 1, pp.193-216

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2022

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000647449

Sıklık:

İki Yıllık

eISSN:

2757-6752

pISSN:

2717-9621