Comparison of Two Different Proprioception Measurement Methods in the Shoulder Joint

Talha Kılıç; Tuğba Kuru Çolak; Ali Tekin; Bahar Özgül; Aycan Cakmak

Makale detayları

Comparison of Two Different Proprioception Measurement Methods in the Shoulder Joint

Yazarlar:

Talha Kılıç | Tuğba Kuru Çolak | Ali Tekin | Bahar Özgül | Aycan Cakmak

Yayıncı:

Marmara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer)

Dergi:

Journal of Health Sciences and Management Vol.4 Issue 2, pp.36-41

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001325355

pISSN:

2757-6914

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: Proprioception assessment is important in shoulder rehabilitation. Proprioception sense can be evaluated with different methods in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare shoulder proprioception measurements made with universal goniometer and isokinetic system. Methods: A total of 52 healthy individuals with a mean age of 24.6 years were included in the study. Shoulder proprioception was evaluated three times with a universal goniometer and isokinetic device at 30, 45 and 60 degrees shoulder flexion angles with eyes closed in a sitting position and mean values were recorded. Results: When the results obtained with the two measurement methods were compared, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean values and there was no correlation relationship between the results of the two measurement methods p0.05. However, when the mean deviation from the target angle was compared with both measurement methods, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the measurement methods p0.005. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that when shoulder proprioception was measured using a goniometer or an isokinetic dynamometer at various angles, different values could be obtained. However, since the differences compared to the target angle are similar for the two measurement methods, both assessment methods can be used for proprioception evaluation.

 Aim: Proprioception assessment is important in shoulder rehabilitation. Proprioception sense can be evaluated with different methods in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare shoulder proprioception measurements made with universal goniometer and isokinetic system. Methods: A total of 52 healthy individuals with a mean age of 24.6 years were included in the study. Shoulder proprioception was evaluated three times with a universal goniometer and isokinetic device at 30, 45 and 60 degrees shoulder flexion angles with eyes closed in a sitting position and mean values were recorded. Results: When the results obtained with the two measurement methods were compared, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean values and there was no correlation relationship between the results of the two measurement methods p0.05. However, when the mean deviation from the target angle was compared with both measurement methods, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the measurement methods p0.005. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that when shoulder proprioception was measured using a goniometer or an isokinetic dynamometer at various angles, different values could be obtained. However, since the differences compared to the target angle are similar for the two measurement methods, both assessment methods can be used for proprioception evaluation.

 Aim: Proprioception assessment is important in shoulder rehabilitation. Proprioception sense can be evaluated with different methods in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare shoulder proprioception measurements made with universal goniometer and isokinetic system. Methods: A total of 52 healthy individuals with a mean age of 24.6 years were included in the study. Shoulder proprioception was evaluated three times with a universal goniometer and isokinetic device at 30, 45 and 60 degrees shoulder flexion angles with eyes closed in a sitting position and mean values were recorded. Results: When the results obtained with the two measurement methods were compared, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean values and there was no correlation relationship between the results of the two measurement methods p0.05. However, when the mean deviation from the target angle was compared with both measurement methods, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the measurement methods p0.005. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that when shoulder proprioception was measured using a goniometer or an isokinetic dynamometer at various angles, different values could be obtained. However, since the differences compared to the target angle are similar for the two measurement methods, both assessment methods can be used for proprioception evaluation.

 Amaç: Omuz rehabilitasyonunda propriyosepsiyon değerlendirmesi önem taşımaktadır. Propriyosepsiyon duyusu klinik ortamda farklı yöntemlerle değerlendirilebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı universal gonyometre ve izokinetik sistem ile yapılan omuz propriosepsiyon ölçümlerini karşılaştırmaktı. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 24,6 yıl olan toplam 52 sağlıklı birey dahil edildi. Omuz propriosepsiyonu, oturur pozisyonda gözler kapalı iken 30, 45 ve 60 derece omuz fleksiyon açılarında universal gonyometre ve izokinetik cihaz ile üç kez değerlendirildi ve ortalama değerler kaydedildi. Bulgular: İki ölçüm yöntemi ile elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırıldığında, ortalama değerler arasında anlamlı fark olduğu ve iki ölçüm yönteminin sonuçları arasında korelasyon ilişkisi olmadığı tespit edildi p0,05. Ancak hedef açıdan ortalama sapma her iki ölçüm yöntemi ile karşılaştırıldığında ölçüm yöntemleri arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı tespit edilmiştir p0,005. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bulguları, omuz propriyosepsiyonu gonyometre veya izokinetik dinamometre kullanılarak çeşitli açılarda ölçüldüğünde farklı değerler elde edilebileceğini göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte, hedef açıya kıyasla farklılıklar iki ölçüm yöntemi için benzer olduğundan, her iki değerlendirme yöntemi de propriyosepsiyon değerlendirmesi için kullanılabilir.

Makale detayları

Comparison of Two Different Proprioception Measurement Methods in the Shoulder Joint

Yazarlar:

Talha Kılıç | Tuğba Kuru Çolak | Ali Tekin | Bahar Özgül | Aycan Cakmak

Yayıncı:

Marmara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer)

Dergi:

Journal of Health Sciences and Management Vol.4 Issue 2, pp.36-41

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001325355

pISSN:

2757-6914

assessment

shoulder

proprioception

rehabilitationdeğerlendirme

omuz

propriosepsiyon

rehabilitasyon

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Talha Kılıç | Tuğba Kuru Çolak | Ali Tekin | Bahar Özgül | Aycan Cakmak

Yayıncı: Marmara University

Ana Başlıklar: Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer)

Dergi: Journal of Health Sciences and Management Vol.4 Issue 2, pp.36-41

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001325355

pISSN: 2757-6914

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Talha Kılıç | Tuğba Kuru Çolak | Ali Tekin | Bahar Özgül | Aycan Cakmak

Yayıncı:

Marmara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer)

Dergi:

Journal of Health Sciences and Management Vol.4 Issue 2, pp.36-41

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001325355

pISSN:

2757-6914