SATISFACTION IN THE JUDGEMENTS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Omca Özdemir

Makale detayları

SATISFACTION IN THE JUDGEMENTS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Yazarlar:

Omca Özdemir

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Hukuku (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.641-704

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001318369

pISSN:

1303-6963

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Satisfaction, which has been used as one of the methods of repairing the damages caused by the acts of another state contrary to international law, has over time become a component of the processes of repairing the damages arising from the human rights violations of states. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has established a strong and creative jurisprudence on the reparation of damages arising from human rights violations by strengthening the broad jurisdiction granted to it by Article 63 of the American Convention on Human Rights with the jurisprudence of international liability law. The Court has played an important role in embedding satisfaction in human rights law by interpreting, diversifying and applying it within the context of the specific needs of human rights law. The Courts contribution to human rights law in this respect stems from the fact that satisfaction is more functional in reinforcing social norms of respect for human dignity through acknowledgement of violations and expressions of commitment to human dignity, compared to compensation, which was the dominant method of reparation in human rights law before the Courts jurisprudence on satisfaction. This is because satisfaction is an effective means, compared to compensation, of enabling international tribunals, which are outside the social environment in which the violations took place and lack the means of intervention in society, to support the construction of a social environment that will provide the basis for a legal and social order based on human rights before violations occur. The expansion and widening of such contributions to the social environment may also have significant implications for human rights courts ability to cope with their increasing workloads.

 Satisfaction, which has been used as one of the methods of repairing the damages caused by the acts of another state contrary to international law, has over time become a component of the processes of repairing the damages arising from the human rights violations of states. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has established a strong and creative jurisprudence on the reparation of damages arising from human rights violations by strengthening the broad jurisdiction granted to it by Article 63 of the American Convention on Human Rights with the jurisprudence of international liability law. The Court has played an important role in embedding satisfaction in human rights law by interpreting, diversifying and applying it within the context of the specific needs of human rights law. The Courts contribution to human rights law in this respect stems from the fact that satisfaction is more functional in reinforcing social norms of respect for human dignity through acknowledgement of violations and expressions of commitment to human dignity, compared to compensation, which was the dominant method of reparation in human rights law before the Courts jurisprudence on satisfaction. This is because satisfaction is an effective means, compared to compensation, of enabling international tribunals, which are outside the social environment in which the violations took place and lack the means of intervention in society, to support the construction of a social environment that will provide the basis for a legal and social order based on human rights before violations occur. The expansion and widening of such contributions to the social environment may also have significant implications for human rights courts ability to cope with their increasing workloads.

 Satisfaction, which has been used as one of the methods of repairing the damages caused by the acts of another state contrary to international law, has over time become a component of the processes of repairing the damages arising from the human rights violations of states. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has established a strong and creative jurisprudence on the reparation of damages arising from human rights violations by strengthening the broad jurisdiction granted to it by Article 63 of the American Convention on Human Rights with the jurisprudence of international liability law. The Court has played an important role in embedding satisfaction in human rights law by interpreting, diversifying and applying it within the context of the specific needs of human rights law. The Courts contribution to human rights law in this respect stems from the fact that satisfaction is more functional in reinforcing social norms of respect for human dignity through acknowledgement of violations and expressions of commitment to human dignity, compared to compensation, which was the dominant method of reparation in human rights law before the Courts jurisprudence on satisfaction. This is because satisfaction is an effective means, compared to compensation, of enabling international tribunals, which are outside the social environment in which the violations took place and lack the means of intervention in society, to support the construction of a social environment that will provide the basis for a legal and social order based on human rights before violations occur. The expansion and widening of such contributions to the social environment may also have significant implications for human rights courts ability to cope with their increasing workloads.

 Devletlerin diğer bir devletin uluslararası hukuka aykırı eyleminden doğan zararlarının onarılması yöntemlerinden biri olarak uygulanagelen tatmin, zaman içerisinde, devletlerin insan hakları ihlallerinden doğan zararların onarımı süreçlerinin de bileşeni haline gelmiştir. Amerikalılar Arası İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi, Amerika İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinin 63. maddesinin kendisine sunduğu geniş yetkiyi uluslararası sorumluluk hukuku içtihatları ile de güçlendirerek insan hakları ihlallerinden doğan zararların onarımında güçlü ve yaratıcı bir içtihat yaratmıştır. Mahkeme, insan hakları hukukunun özgül ihtiyaçları kapsamında yorumlayarak, çeşitlendirerek ve uygulayarak tatminin insan hakları hukukuna yerleşmesinde önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Mahkemenin bu bakımdan insan hakları hukukuna katkısı, tatminin ihlallerin ikrarı ve insan onuruna bağlılık ifadeleri ile insan onuruna saygıyı içeren sosyal normların güçlendirilmesinde, kendisinin tatmin içtihadından önce insan hakları hukukunda hakim onarım yöntemi olan tazminata kıyasla işlevsel oluşundan kaynaklanmaktadır. Zira tatmin, ihlallerin gerçekleştiği sosyal ortamın dışında bulunan ve devletin topluma müdahale araçlarından yoksun olan uluslararası mahkemelerin, insan haklarına dayalı bir hukuksal ve toplumsal düzenin ihlaller gerçekleşmeden sağlanmasına dayanak olacak sosyal çevrenin inşasına desteğinin tazminata kıyasla etkili bir aracıdır. Sosyal çevreye dönük bu tür katkıların yaygınlaşması ve genişletilmesi, insan hakları mahkemelerinin artan iş yükleriyle başa çıkmaları bakımından da anlamlı sonuçlara yol açabilecektir.

Makale detayları

SATISFACTION IN THE JUDGEMENTS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Yazarlar:

Omca Özdemir

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Hukuku (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.641-704

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001318369

pISSN:

1303-6963

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Reparation

Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts

Satisfaction

Non-Pecuniary Compensation

Guarantees of Non-RepetitionAmerikalılar Arası İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi

Onarım

Devletlerin Uluslararası Hukuka Aykırı Eylemlerinden Sorumluluğu

Tatmin

Manevi Tazminat

Tekrarlamama Garantileri

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Omca Özdemir

Yayıncı: Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar: Kamu Hukuku (Diğer)

Dergi: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.641-704

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001318369

pISSN: 1303-6963

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Omca Özdemir

Yayıncı:

Dokuz Eylul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Hukuku (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.641-704

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001318369

pISSN:

1303-6963