Evaluating the Influence of Coconut Oil Pulling and Adhesive Application Modes on Shear Bond Strength to Enamel

Betül Kübra Kurucu Karadeniz

Makale detayları

Evaluating the Influence of Coconut Oil Pulling and Adhesive Application Modes on Shear Bond Strength to Enamel

Yazarlar:

Betül Kübra Kurucu Karadeniz

Yayıncı:

Harran University

Ana Başlıklar:

Restorative Dentistry

Dergi:

HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.102-107

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337798

pISSN:

2792-0224

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effects of coconut oil pulling and two different application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch on the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Methods:Forty healthy bovine incisor teeth were selected, cleaned, and stored in a 0.1 thymol solution for one week.The crowns were separated from the roots and embedded in acrylic resin blocks. Oil pulling group: Samples were treated with coconut oil pulling prior to adhesive application.Non-oil pulling group: Samples did not undergo oil pulling. Two adhesive application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick were tested:Etch-and-rinse mode.Self-etch mode.Composite resin was bonded to the enamel surface, and the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine.The results were analyzed using ANOVA, with p-values set to 0.05 to determine statistical significance. Results:Statistically significant differences were observed between the test groups p0.001. The group treated with coconut oil pulling exhibited lower bond strength compared to the control group without oil pulling. Additionally, the etch-and-rinse application mode resulted in significantly higher bond strength compared to the self-etch mode, regardless of oil pulling treatment. Conclusions:Coconut oil pulling was found to reduce the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Furthermore, the etch-and-rinse adhesive application mode outperformed the self-etch mode in terms of bond strength. These findings suggest that oil pulling may interfere with adhesive bonding, and the choice of adhesive mode plays a crucial role in optimizing bond strength.

 Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effects of coconut oil pulling and two different application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch on the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Methods:Forty healthy bovine incisor teeth were selected, cleaned, and stored in a 0.1 thymol solution for one week.The crowns were separated from the roots and embedded in acrylic resin blocks. Oil pulling group: Samples were treated with coconut oil pulling prior to adhesive application.Non-oil pulling group: Samples did not undergo oil pulling. Two adhesive application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick were tested:Etch-and-rinse mode.Self-etch mode.Composite resin was bonded to the enamel surface, and the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine.The results were analyzed using ANOVA, with p-values set to 0.05 to determine statistical significance. Results:Statistically significant differences were observed between the test groups p0.001. The group treated with coconut oil pulling exhibited lower bond strength compared to the control group without oil pulling. Additionally, the etch-and-rinse application mode resulted in significantly higher bond strength compared to the self-etch mode, regardless of oil pulling treatment. Conclusions:Coconut oil pulling was found to reduce the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Furthermore, the etch-and-rinse adhesive application mode outperformed the self-etch mode in terms of bond strength. These findings suggest that oil pulling may interfere with adhesive bonding, and the choice of adhesive mode plays a crucial role in optimizing bond strength.

 Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effects of coconut oil pulling and two different application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch on the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Methods:Forty healthy bovine incisor teeth were selected, cleaned, and stored in a 0.1 thymol solution for one week.The crowns were separated from the roots and embedded in acrylic resin blocks. Oil pulling group: Samples were treated with coconut oil pulling prior to adhesive application.Non-oil pulling group: Samples did not undergo oil pulling. Two adhesive application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick were tested:Etch-and-rinse mode.Self-etch mode.Composite resin was bonded to the enamel surface, and the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine.The results were analyzed using ANOVA, with p-values set to 0.05 to determine statistical significance. Results:Statistically significant differences were observed between the test groups p0.001. The group treated with coconut oil pulling exhibited lower bond strength compared to the control group without oil pulling. Additionally, the etch-and-rinse application mode resulted in significantly higher bond strength compared to the self-etch mode, regardless of oil pulling treatment. Conclusions:Coconut oil pulling was found to reduce the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Furthermore, the etch-and-rinse adhesive application mode outperformed the self-etch mode in terms of bond strength. These findings suggest that oil pulling may interfere with adhesive bonding, and the choice of adhesive mode plays a crucial role in optimizing bond strength.

 Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effects of coconut oil pulling and two different application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch on the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Methods:Forty healthy bovine incisor teeth were selected, cleaned, and stored in a 0.1 thymol solution for one week.The crowns were separated from the roots and embedded in acrylic resin blocks. Oil pulling group: Samples were treated with coconut oil pulling prior to adhesive application.Non-oil pulling group: Samples did not undergo oil pulling. Two adhesive application modes of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick were tested:Etch-and-rinse mode.Self-etch mode.Composite resin was bonded to the enamel surface, and the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine.The results were analyzed using ANOVA, with p-values set to 0.05 to determine statistical significance. Results:Statistically significant differences were observed between the test groups p0.001. The group treated with coconut oil pulling exhibited lower bond strength compared to the control group without oil pulling. Additionally, the etch-and-rinse application mode resulted in significantly higher bond strength compared to the self-etch mode, regardless of oil pulling treatment. Conclusions:Coconut oil pulling was found to reduce the shear bond strength of composite resins to bovine enamel. Furthermore, the etch-and-rinse adhesive application mode outperformed the self-etch mode in terms of bond strength. These findings suggest that oil pulling may interfere with adhesive bonding, and the choice of adhesive mode plays a crucial role in optimizing bond strength.

Makale detayları

Evaluating the Influence of Coconut Oil Pulling and Adhesive Application Modes on Shear Bond Strength to Enamel

Yazarlar: Betül Kübra Kurucu Karadeniz

Yayıncı: Harran University

Ana Başlıklar: Restorative Dentistry

Dergi: HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.102-107

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001337798

pISSN: 2792-0224

adhesive

oil pulling

shear bond strength

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Betül Kübra Kurucu Karadeniz

Yayıncı:

Harran University

Ana Başlıklar:

Restorative Dentistry

Dergi:

HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research Vol.4 Issue 3, pp.102-107

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337798

pISSN:

2792-0224