TURAYSISI'S APPROACH TO THE REASONS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THE TA’WIL OF THE QUR'AN AND MUTASHABIH

Naim Döner

Makale detayları

TURAYSISI'S APPROACH TO THE REASONS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THE TA’WIL OF THE QUR'AN AND MUTASHABIH

Yazarlar:

Naim Döner

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din Felsefesi

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 27, pp.247-261

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001316486

pISSN:

1309-6672

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 There is no information about Rukn al-Dīn Abu Tahir al-Turaysī, a Mutazilite scholar, in the books of tabāqāt. The author evaluates the verses related to the issues of belief from a theological perspective in his work titled Mutashābih al-Qurān, which has survived to the present day. Criticising the methods of the Hashwiyya, Rafiza and Batiniyya sects in their approach to the tawil of the Quran, al-Turaysisī defends the Muʿtazilite approach based on reason and linguistic analysis. According to al-Ṭuraysisī, the association, istikaq etymology, and ijmal brief in the wording cause disagreement in the tawil. Unless there is a presumption, the literal meaning of the word is not left, and the metaphoric meaning is not used. The Prophets words and deeds are the source of explanation for the Shariah concepts, such as prayer and zakat, which need clarification. Issues such as attribution, mujawarah, and exception lead to disputes in terms of verse poetry, while excess, hazif, and the misuse of the expression in its place lead to the emergence of disputes in terms of metaphor. Issues such as detaching the verses from their contexts, compiling unrelated verses, and not evaluating the verses holistically also cause disagreement in the tawil. According to al-Turaysī, the basic principles that ensure the correctness of the meaning in the tawil are reason, the Quran, the Sunnah, Ijma consensus, and the Arabic language. In order to obtain the correct tawil, the tawils must be presented to them. Since Allah praises those who believe in the mutashabih verses and condemns those who pursue the interpretation of the verses, al-Turaysisī is of the opinion that even those who have deep knowledge of science do not know the meaning of the mutashabih.

 There is no information about Rukn al-Dīn Abu Tahir al-Turaysī, a Mutazilite scholar, in the books of tabāqāt. The author evaluates the verses related to the issues of belief from a theological perspective in his work titled Mutashābih al-Qurān, which has survived to the present day. Criticising the methods of the Hashwiyya, Rafiza and Batiniyya sects in their approach to the tawil of the Quran, al-Turaysisī defends the Muʿtazilite approach based on reason and linguistic analysis. According to al-Ṭuraysisī, the association, istikaq etymology, and ijmal brief in the wording cause disagreement in the tawil. Unless there is a presumption, the literal meaning of the word is not left, and the metaphoric meaning is not used. The Prophets words and deeds are the source of explanation for the Shariah concepts, such as prayer and zakat, which need clarification. Issues such as attribution, mujawarah, and exception lead to disputes in terms of verse poetry, while excess, hazif, and the misuse of the expression in its place lead to the emergence of disputes in terms of metaphor. Issues such as detaching the verses from their contexts, compiling unrelated verses, and not evaluating the verses holistically also cause disagreement in the tawil. According to al-Turaysī, the basic principles that ensure the correctness of the meaning in the tawil are reason, the Quran, the Sunnah, Ijma consensus, and the Arabic language. In order to obtain the correct tawil, the tawils must be presented to them. Since Allah praises those who believe in the mutashabih verses and condemns those who pursue the interpretation of the verses, al-Turaysisī is of the opinion that even those who have deep knowledge of science do not know the meaning of the mutashabih.

 There is no information about Rukn al-Dīn Abu Tahir al-Turaysī, a Mutazilite scholar, in the books of tabāqāt. The author evaluates the verses related to the issues of belief from a theological perspective in his work titled Mutashābih al-Qurān, which has survived to the present day. Criticising the methods of the Hashwiyya, Rafiza and Batiniyya sects in their approach to the tawil of the Quran, al-Turaysisī defends the Muʿtazilite approach based on reason and linguistic analysis. According to al-Ṭuraysisī, the association, istikaq etymology, and ijmal brief in the wording cause disagreement in the tawil. Unless there is a presumption, the literal meaning of the word is not left, and the metaphoric meaning is not used. The Prophets words and deeds are the source of explanation for the Shariah concepts, such as prayer and zakat, which need clarification. Issues such as attribution, mujawarah, and exception lead to disputes in terms of verse poetry, while excess, hazif, and the misuse of the expression in its place lead to the emergence of disputes in terms of metaphor. Issues such as detaching the verses from their contexts, compiling unrelated verses, and not evaluating the verses holistically also cause disagreement in the tawil. According to al-Turaysī, the basic principles that ensure the correctness of the meaning in the tawil are reason, the Quran, the Sunnah, Ijma consensus, and the Arabic language. In order to obtain the correct tawil, the tawils must be presented to them. Since Allah praises those who believe in the mutashabih verses and condemns those who pursue the interpretation of the verses, al-Turaysisī is of the opinion that even those who have deep knowledge of science do not know the meaning of the mutashabih.

 Mutezilî bir âlim olan Rüknüddin Ebu Tahir et-Tureysisîye ilişkin Tabâkât kitaplarında herhangi bir bilgi bulunmamaktadır. Müellif, günümüze ulaşan Müteşâbihül-Kurân adlı eserinde inanç konularına dair âyetleri konulu bir şekilde kelâmî bir perspektifle değerlendirir. Haşviyye, Rafıza ve Batıniyye mezheplerinin Kurân teviline yaklaşım yöntemlerini tenkit eden Tureysisî, aklī ve dilsel tahlil yöntemine dayalı Mutezilî yaklaşım yöntemini savunur. Tureysisîye göre lafızdaki iştirak, iştikak ve icmal tevilde ihtilafa neden olur. Bir karine bulunmadıkça lafzın hakikî manası bırakılıp mecazî manaya gidilmez. Hz. Peygamberin söz ve fiilleri, beyana muhtaç olan namaz ve zekât gibi şerî mücmellerin izah kaynağıdır. Atıf, mücaveret ve istisna gibi hususlar nazım cihetiyle, ziyadelik, hazif ve ifadenin yerinde kullanılmaması da mecaz açısından ihtilafın ortaya çıkmasına yol açar. Nassların bağlamından koparılması, birbiriyle ilgisi olmayan âyetlerin telfik edilmesi ve âyetlerin bütüncül olarak değerlendirilmemesi gibi hususlar da tevilde ihtilafa sebep olur. Tureysisîye göre tevilde anlamın doğruluğunu sağlayan temel ilkeler akıl, Kurân, Sünnet, İcma ve Arap dilidir. Doğru tevili elde etmek için tevillerin bunlara arz edilmesi gerekir. Tureysisî, Allah Teâlânın müteşâbih âyetlere iman edenleri övmesi ve âyetlerin tevilinin ardına düşenleri yermesi nedeniyle ilimde derin bilgi sahibi olanların da müteşâbihin anlamını bilmediği kanaatini taşımaktadır.

Makale detayları

TURAYSISI'S APPROACH TO THE REASONS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THE TA’WIL OF THE QUR'AN AND MUTASHABIH

Yazarlar:

Naim Döner

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din Felsefesi

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 27, pp.247-261

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001316486

pISSN:

1309-6672

Tafsir

Mu

al-Turaysisī

Reasons for Disagreement in the Ta’wil

Mutashābīh.Tefsir

Mu’tezile

et-Tureysisî

Te’vilde ihtilaf nedenleri

müteşâbih

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Naim Döner

Yayıncı: Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar: Din Felsefesi

Dergi: Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 27, pp.247-261

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001316486

pISSN: 1309-6672

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Naim Döner

Yayıncı:

Bingol University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din Felsefesi

Dergi:

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 27, pp.247-261

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001316486

pISSN:

1309-6672