Differences in Qiraat and its Effect on Fiqh Rulings  (In The Context of Worship)

Yusuf Çınar

Makale detayları

Differences in Qiraat and its Effect on Fiqh Rulings (In The Context of Worship)

Yazarlar:

Yusuf Çınar

Yayıncı:

Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Dergi:

Kafkas Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 20, pp.643-666

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001282571

pISSN:

2148-8177

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The science of Qiraah examines the different ways of reading the Quran and from whom they were transmitted. These different readings change the meaning of the verses from time to time. These different readings, especially for the Quran, which is the first source of reference for fiqh in terms of deduction of rulings, have been the subject of discussions by scholars. Qiraat differences have been included in the field of jurisprudence in two aspects. The first is the status of reciting different qiraats in prayer, which are not agreed upon to be accepted as the Quran, and whether these recitations will interfere with the validity of the prayer. The second is the status of these differences as evidence in terms of fiqh and their effect on the ruling. In terms of fiqh, the acceptability of the Qiraat has been divided into acceptable, tawakkuf undecided, and merdūd categories, largely based on the strength of their scripts. In this study, the aspects of qiraat differences that affect the ruling in terms of fiqh and the methodology adopted by the sects on qiraat have been revealed. In this context, a conceptual basis in the fields of fiqh and qiraat has been established before examining the main subject of worship and the effect of qiraat differences. The study evaluates the effect of the differences in the Qiraah on the rulings on issues related to cleanliness, prayer and fasting, hajj, pilgrimage and expiation, the approaches of the sects, and whether the sects have adopted an approach parallel to the methodology they have put forward in accepting the Qiraah.

 The science of Qiraah examines the different ways of reading the Quran and from whom they were transmitted. These different readings change the meaning of the verses from time to time. These different readings, especially for the Quran, which is the first source of reference for fiqh in terms of deduction of rulings, have been the subject of discussions by scholars. Qiraat differences have been included in the field of jurisprudence in two aspects. The first is the status of reciting different qiraats in prayer, which are not agreed upon to be accepted as the Quran, and whether these recitations will interfere with the validity of the prayer. The second is the status of these differences as evidence in terms of fiqh and their effect on the ruling. In terms of fiqh, the acceptability of the Qiraat has been divided into acceptable, tawakkuf undecided, and merdūd categories, largely based on the strength of their scripts. In this study, the aspects of qiraat differences that affect the ruling in terms of fiqh and the methodology adopted by the sects on qiraat have been revealed. In this context, a conceptual basis in the fields of fiqh and qiraat has been established before examining the main subject of worship and the effect of qiraat differences. The study evaluates the effect of the differences in the Qiraah on the rulings on issues related to cleanliness, prayer and fasting, hajj, pilgrimage and expiation, the approaches of the sects, and whether the sects have adopted an approach parallel to the methodology they have put forward in accepting the Qiraah.

 The science of Qiraah examines the different ways of reading the Quran and from whom they were transmitted. These different readings change the meaning of the verses from time to time. These different readings, especially for the Quran, which is the first source of reference for fiqh in terms of deduction of rulings, have been the subject of discussions by scholars. Qiraat differences have been included in the field of jurisprudence in two aspects. The first is the status of reciting different qiraats in prayer, which are not agreed upon to be accepted as the Quran, and whether these recitations will interfere with the validity of the prayer. The second is the status of these differences as evidence in terms of fiqh and their effect on the ruling. In terms of fiqh, the acceptability of the Qiraat has been divided into acceptable, tawakkuf undecided, and merdūd categories, largely based on the strength of their scripts. In this study, the aspects of qiraat differences that affect the ruling in terms of fiqh and the methodology adopted by the sects on qiraat have been revealed. In this context, a conceptual basis in the fields of fiqh and qiraat has been established before examining the main subject of worship and the effect of qiraat differences. The study evaluates the effect of the differences in the Qiraah on the rulings on issues related to cleanliness, prayer and fasting, hajj, pilgrimage and expiation, the approaches of the sects, and whether the sects have adopted an approach parallel to the methodology they have put forward in accepting the Qiraah.

 Kıraat ilmi Kuranın farklı okuma biçimlerini ve bunların kimlerden nakledildiğini incelemektedir. Söz konusu farklı okuma biçimleri zaman zaman ayetlerin anlamını değiştirmektedir. Özellikle hüküm istinbatı açısından fıkhın ilk başvuru kaynağı olan Kuran için söz konusu olan bu farklı okumalar âlimlerce tartışmalara konu edilmiştir. Kıraat farklılıkları iki yönüyle fıkhın inceleme alanında yer almıştır. Birincisi Kuran olarak kabul edilmesi noktasında üzerinde icma bulunmayan farklı kıraatlerin namazda okunma durumu ve bu okumaların namazın sıhhatine engel olup olmayacağıdır. İkincisi ise bu farklılıkların fıkhi açıdan delil olma ve hükme etkide bulunma durumudur. Fıkhi açıdan kıraatlerin kabul edilebilirliği büyük ölçüde bunların senedinin kuvvetli olma durumu dikkate alınarak makbul, tevakkuf edilen hakkında karar verilmeyen ve merdûd gibi kısımlara ayrılmıştır. Bu çalışma ile kıraat farklılıklarının fıkhi açıdan hükme tesir eden yönleri ve mezheplerin kıraat konusunda benimsedikleri usul ortaya konulmuştur. Bu bağlamda ana konu olan ibadetler ve kıraat farklılıklarının etkisi incelenmeden önce, fıkıh ve kıraat alanlarında kavramsal bir temel oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmada temizlik, namaz ve oruç, hac-umre ve kefâretler ile ilgili konularda var olan kıraat farklılıklarının hükme etkisi, mezheplerin yaklaşımları ve mezheplerin kıraatleri kabul etme hususunda ortaya koydukları usule paralel bir yaklaşım benimseyip benimsemedikleri değerlendirilmiştir.

Makale detayları

Differences in Qiraat and its Effect on Fiqh Rulings (In The Context of Worship)

Yazarlar:

Yusuf Çınar

Yayıncı:

Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Dergi:

Kafkas Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 20, pp.643-666

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001282571

pISSN:

2148-8177

Qiraat

Fiqh

Ruling

Worship

Kıraat

Fıkıh

Hüküm

İbadet

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Yusuf Çınar

Yayıncı: Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar: Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Dergi: Kafkas Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 20, pp.643-666

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001282571

pISSN: 2148-8177

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Yusuf Çınar

Yayıncı:

Kafkas University

Ana Başlıklar:

Din | Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları

Dergi:

Kafkas Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 20, pp.643-666

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001282571

pISSN:

2148-8177