A Comparison of al-Taysîr and al-Kashshâf Regarding the Science of Ma‘ânî: A Case Study of Surah al-Fâtiha

Hatice Kübra Özcan

Makale detayları

A Comparison of al-Taysîr and al-Kashshâf Regarding the Science of Ma‘ânî: A Case Study of Surah al-Fâtiha

Yazarlar:

Hatice Kübra Özcan

Yayıncı:

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Dergi:

Burdur İlahiyat Dergisi Issue 6, pp.248-267

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001291052

pISSN:

2980-2407

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Omar al-Nasafî and al-Zamakhsharî are scholars who possess expertise in multiple branches of Islamic sciences. In this paper, the manner in which two exegetes interpret the maânî arts in their exegeses have been analysed extensively in a comparative manner. The points of comparison between al-Nasafî and al-Zamakhsharî are that they have different aspects of scientific perspectives and theological thought systems. In addition, the exegeses of these two exegetis, which reflect their thought system enable comparison. Due to the impossibility of discussing all maânî arts within the scope of an article, Surah al-Fâtiha has been chosen as an example. The maânî arts that are identified through two exegetis interpretations of the beginning of Basmala to the last verse of the surah, shape the focus of this study. Thus, it is aimed to analyse the way in which the two contemporary and well-rounded exegetis who belong to different theological schools. They included the maânî arts in verses and discussed them in their exegeses. In this way, evidence has been obtained regarding how the prominent scholars of the period interpreted the meanings of the verses before the science of rhetoric had not gained an independent scientific identity. It is important to present scholars approaches in their exegeses regarding the science of maânî to understand the development process of this science during a period when rhetoric was incomplete in terms of its three aspects - maânî, beyân and bedî.

 Omar al-Nasafî and al-Zamakhsharî are scholars who possess expertise in multiple branches of Islamic sciences. In this paper, the manner in which two exegetes interpret the maânî arts in their exegeses have been analysed extensively in a comparative manner. The points of comparison between al-Nasafî and al-Zamakhsharî are that they have different aspects of scientific perspectives and theological thought systems. In addition, the exegeses of these two exegetis, which reflect their thought system enable comparison. Due to the impossibility of discussing all maânî arts within the scope of an article, Surah al-Fâtiha has been chosen as an example. The maânî arts that are identified through two exegetis interpretations of the beginning of Basmala to the last verse of the surah, shape the focus of this study. Thus, it is aimed to analyse the way in which the two contemporary and well-rounded exegetis who belong to different theological schools. They included the maânî arts in verses and discussed them in their exegeses. In this way, evidence has been obtained regarding how the prominent scholars of the period interpreted the meanings of the verses before the science of rhetoric had not gained an independent scientific identity. It is important to present scholars approaches in their exegeses regarding the science of maânî to understand the development process of this science during a period when rhetoric was incomplete in terms of its three aspects - maânî, beyân and bedî.

 Omar al-Nasafî and al-Zamakhsharî are scholars who possess expertise in multiple branches of Islamic sciences. In this paper, the manner in which two exegetes interpret the maânî arts in their exegeses have been analysed extensively in a comparative manner. The points of comparison between al-Nasafî and al-Zamakhsharî are that they have different aspects of scientific perspectives and theological thought systems. In addition, the exegeses of these two exegetis, which reflect their thought system enable comparison. Due to the impossibility of discussing all maânî arts within the scope of an article, Surah al-Fâtiha has been chosen as an example. The maânî arts that are identified through two exegetis interpretations of the beginning of Basmala to the last verse of the surah, shape the focus of this study. Thus, it is aimed to analyse the way in which the two contemporary and well-rounded exegetis who belong to different theological schools. They included the maânî arts in verses and discussed them in their exegeses. In this way, evidence has been obtained regarding how the prominent scholars of the period interpreted the meanings of the verses before the science of rhetoric had not gained an independent scientific identity. It is important to present scholars approaches in their exegeses regarding the science of maânî to understand the development process of this science during a period when rhetoric was incomplete in terms of its three aspects - maânî, beyân and bedî.

 Ömer en-Nesefî ö. 5371142 ve Zemahşerî ö. 5381144 İslâmî ilimlerin birden fazla dalında yetkinliğe sahip çok yönlü iki müfessirdir. Makalede, bu iki âlimin tefsirlerinde âyetlerdeki meânî sanatlarını yorumlama şekilleri karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmektedir. Nesefî ve Zemahşerînin mukayeseye konu olan yanları, farklı itikadî düşünce sistemlerine ve farklı ilmî bakış açılarına sahip olmalarıdır. Bunun yanı sıra iki âlimin düşünce sistemlerini yansıtan tefsirleri, karşılaştırma yapılmasına olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu tefsirlerde yer alan tüm meânî sanatlarını bir makalede anlatmak mümkün olmadığı için bir örneklem olarak Fâtiha sûresi seçilmiştir. Besmeleden başlanarak sûrenin son âyetine kadar iki müfessirin yorumları doğrultusunda tespit edilen meânî sanatları, çalışmanın başlıklarını şekillendirmektedir. Böylece farklı itikadî ekollere mensup muasır ve çok yönlü iki âlimin, tefsirlerinde âyetlerdeki meânî sanatlarına yer veriş ve işleyiş tarzlarının incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu şekilde belâgat ilmi henüz müstakil bir kimlik kazanmamışken dönemin önemli âlimlerinden âyetlerdeki meânî açıklamalarını nasıl ele aldıklarına dair bulgular elde edilmiştir. Belâgatın meânî, beyân ve bedî şeklinde henüz teşekkülünü tamamlamadığı bir dönemde tefsirlerinde meânî ilmine dair yaklaşımlarının sunulması bu ilmin gelişim sürecinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlaması bakımından önem arz etmektedir.

Makale detayları

A Comparison of al-Taysîr and al-Kashshâf Regarding the Science of Ma‘ânî: A Case Study of Surah al-Fâtiha

Yazarlar:

Hatice Kübra Özcan

Yayıncı:

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Dergi:

Burdur İlahiyat Dergisi Issue 6, pp.248-267

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001291052

pISSN:

2980-2407

Arabic Language and Rhetoric

Ma‘ânî

Nasafi

Zamakhsharî

Taysîr

KashshâfArap Dili ve Belâgatı

Meânî

Nesefî

Zemahşerî

Teysîr

Keşşâf

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Hatice Kübra Özcan

Yayıncı: Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Dergi: Burdur İlahiyat Dergisi Issue 6, pp.248-267

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001291052

pISSN: 2980-2407

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Hatice Kübra Özcan

Yayıncı:

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Dergi:

Burdur İlahiyat Dergisi Issue 6, pp.248-267

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001291052

pISSN:

2980-2407