Intralingual (Re)translations of Foreign words and phrases in the texts translated into Ottoman Turkish

N.A.

Makale detayları

Intralingual (Re)translations of Foreign words and phrases in the texts translated into Ottoman Turkish

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim

Dergi:

RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 33, pp.1410-1423

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288420

pISSN:

2148-7782

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The Alphabet Reform of 1928 necessitated transcriptionintralingual translation of works written in Ottoman Turkish in order to pass them to posterity. Reprints made in the new alphabet were soon to replace old books as the law only allowed book printing in Latin alphabet as of 1 January 1929. This intralingual translation activity has continued in full throttle until our day. At first, authors of the Ottoman period did intralingual self translations to continue their fame and remain readable in the Republic period. Similarly, the ageing words were simplified in intralingual translation efforts in the new era. However, there are translated works besides authored books to be transferred to the new alphabet. During intralingual translations of Ottoman translated works, the source text may contain lots of foreign words andor phrases that are written as they are or as pronounced by the authors of the source texts. This may result in different renderings of the same foreign words by the translators. We find it important to problematize this subject as there is increased interest in our day on translated works by the Ottoman authors. This study aims to describe the strategies adopted by the translators, by examining how foreign words and phrases were rendered in the two transcriptions andor intralingual translations of Ahmed Midhat Efendis Niza-i İlm ü Din  İslam ve Ulûm. The first intralingual translation of the Ottoman Turkish translated text was done by Mustafa Yıldırım in 2018. It was followed by Bünyamin Tans intralingual translation in 2021.

 The Alphabet Reform of 1928 necessitated transcriptionintralingual translation of works written in Ottoman Turkish in order to pass them to posterity. Reprints made in the new alphabet were soon to replace old books as the law only allowed book printing in Latin alphabet as of 1 January 1929. This intralingual translation activity has continued in full throttle until our day. At first, authors of the Ottoman period did intralingual self translations to continue their fame and remain readable in the Republic period. Similarly, the ageing words were simplified in intralingual translation efforts in the new era. However, there are translated works besides authored books to be transferred to the new alphabet. During intralingual translations of Ottoman translated works, the source text may contain lots of foreign words andor phrases that are written as they are or as pronounced by the authors of the source texts. This may result in different renderings of the same foreign words by the translators. We find it important to problematize this subject as there is increased interest in our day on translated works by the Ottoman authors. This study aims to describe the strategies adopted by the translators, by examining how foreign words and phrases were rendered in the two transcriptions andor intralingual translations of Ahmed Midhat Efendis Niza-i İlm ü Din  İslam ve Ulûm. The first intralingual translation of the Ottoman Turkish translated text was done by Mustafa Yıldırım in 2018. It was followed by Bünyamin Tans intralingual translation in 2021.

 The Alphabet Reform of 1928 necessitated transcriptionintralingual translation of works written in Ottoman Turkish in order to pass them to posterity. Reprints made in the new alphabet were soon to replace old books as the law only allowed book printing in Latin alphabet as of 1 January 1929. This intralingual translation activity has continued in full throttle until our day. At first, authors of the Ottoman period did intralingual self translations to continue their fame and remain readable in the Republic period. Similarly, the ageing words were simplified in intralingual translation efforts in the new era. However, there are translated works besides authored books to be transferred to the new alphabet. During intralingual translations of Ottoman translated works, the source text may contain lots of foreign words andor phrases that are written as they are or as pronounced by the authors of the source texts. This may result in different renderings of the same foreign words by the translators. We find it important to problematize this subject as there is increased interest in our day on translated works by the Ottoman authors. This study aims to describe the strategies adopted by the translators, by examining how foreign words and phrases were rendered in the two transcriptions andor intralingual translations of Ahmed Midhat Efendis Niza-i İlm ü Din  İslam ve Ulûm. The first intralingual translation of the Ottoman Turkish translated text was done by Mustafa Yıldırım in 2018. It was followed by Bünyamin Tans intralingual translation in 2021.

 The Alphabet Reform of 1928 necessitated transcriptionintralingual translation of works written in Ottoman Turkish in order to pass them to posterity. Reprints made in the new alphabet were soon to replace old books as the law only allowed book printing in Latin alphabet as of 1 January 1929. This intralingual translation activity has continued in full throttle until our day. At first, authors of the Ottoman period did intralingual self translations to continue their fame and remain readable in the Republic period. Similarly, the ageing words were simplified in intralingual translation efforts in the new era. However, there are translated works besides authored books to be transferred to the new alphabet. During intralingual translations of Ottoman translated works, the source text may contain lots of foreign words andor phrases that are written as they are or as pronounced by the authors of the source texts. This may result in different renderings of the same foreign words by the translators. We find it important to problematize this subject as there is increased interest in our day on translated works by the Ottoman authors. This study aims to describe the strategies adopted by the translators, by examining how foreign words and phrases were rendered in the two transcriptions andor intralingual translations of Ahmed Midhat Efendis Niza-i İlm ü Din  İslam ve Ulûm. The first intralingual translation of the Ottoman Turkish translated text was done by Mustafa Yıldırım in 2018. It was followed by Bünyamin Tans intralingual translation in 2021.

Makale detayları

Intralingual (Re)translations of Foreign words and phrases in the texts translated into Ottoman Turkish

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim

Dergi:

RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 33, pp.1410-1423

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288420

pISSN:

2148-7782

Transcription/transliteration

intralingual translation

foreign words

translation strategies

Sayı

Makale detayları

Intralingual (Re)translations of Foreign words and phrases in the texts translated into Ottoman Turkish

Yazarlar: N.A.

Yayıncı: Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar: Dilbilim

Dergi: RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 33, pp.1410-1423

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001288420

pISSN: 2148-7782

Transcription/transliteration

intralingual translation

foreign words

translation strategies

Sayı

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim

Dergi:

RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 33, pp.1410-1423

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288420

pISSN:

2148-7782