Autonomous Interpretation in Individual Application in the Framework of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Turkish Constitutional Court

Ufuk Ramazan Çakmak

Makale detayları

Autonomous Interpretation in Individual Application in the Framework of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Turkish Constitutional Court

Yazarlar:

Ufuk Ramazan Çakmak

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 1, pp.199-226

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288854

pISSN:

1306-3839

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Various tools are used in the interpretation of the rights and freedoms in the European Convention on Human Rights ECHR or the Convention. In this context, the main tools used by the European Court of Human Rights ECHR or the Court; discretion, fourth instance doctrine, dynamic interpretation, the principle of proportionality and autonomous interpretation. There are 46 countries that are party to the European Convention on Human Rights. Since there are many states with different legal systems in the contract system, The interpretation of concepts or terms in the Convention may differ from country to country. In the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the meaning given to a concept in national law is a starting point. Autonomous interpretation refers to the consideration of the meaning of a concept independently of its meaning in national law. In this way, it is prevented that the rights and freedoms in the Convention are abolished or narrowly interpreted by the parties. Autonomous interpretation, which has been used in the contract system for many years, is also a method of interpretation used by the Constitutional Court. While the Turkish Constitutional Court makes autonomous interpretations, it tends to act in line with the ECtHR case-laws.

 Various tools are used in the interpretation of the rights and freedoms in the European Convention on Human Rights ECHR or the Convention. In this context, the main tools used by the European Court of Human Rights ECHR or the Court; discretion, fourth instance doctrine, dynamic interpretation, the principle of proportionality and autonomous interpretation. There are 46 countries that are party to the European Convention on Human Rights. Since there are many states with different legal systems in the contract system, The interpretation of concepts or terms in the Convention may differ from country to country. In the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the meaning given to a concept in national law is a starting point. Autonomous interpretation refers to the consideration of the meaning of a concept independently of its meaning in national law. In this way, it is prevented that the rights and freedoms in the Convention are abolished or narrowly interpreted by the parties. Autonomous interpretation, which has been used in the contract system for many years, is also a method of interpretation used by the Constitutional Court. While the Turkish Constitutional Court makes autonomous interpretations, it tends to act in line with the ECtHR case-laws.

 Various tools are used in the interpretation of the rights and freedoms in the European Convention on Human Rights ECHR or the Convention. In this context, the main tools used by the European Court of Human Rights ECHR or the Court; discretion, fourth instance doctrine, dynamic interpretation, the principle of proportionality and autonomous interpretation. There are 46 countries that are party to the European Convention on Human Rights. Since there are many states with different legal systems in the contract system, The interpretation of concepts or terms in the Convention may differ from country to country. In the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the meaning given to a concept in national law is a starting point. Autonomous interpretation refers to the consideration of the meaning of a concept independently of its meaning in national law. In this way, it is prevented that the rights and freedoms in the Convention are abolished or narrowly interpreted by the parties. Autonomous interpretation, which has been used in the contract system for many years, is also a method of interpretation used by the Constitutional Court. While the Turkish Constitutional Court makes autonomous interpretations, it tends to act in line with the ECtHR case-laws.

 Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinde AİHS veya Sözleşme yer alan hak ve özgürlüklerin yorumlanmasında çeşitli araçlara başvurulmaktadır. Bu kapsamda Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi AİHM veya Mahkeme tarafından kullanılan temel araçlar; takdir yetkisi, dördüncü derece yargı doktrini, dinamik yorum, ölçülülük ilkesi ve özerk yorumdur. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesine taraf olan 46 ülke bulunmaktadır. AİHS sisteminde farklı hukuk sistemlerine sahip olan çok sayıda devlet bulunduğu için Sözleşmede yer alan kavramların veya terimlerin yorumu, ülkeden ülkeye göre farklılık gösterebilir. AİHM uygulamasında bir kavrama ulusal hukukta verilen anlam, hareket noktası niteliğindedir. Özerk yorum, bir kavramının anlamının ulusal hukuktaki anlamından bağımsız olarak ele alınmasını ifade eder. Bu sayede Sözleşmede yer alan hak ve özgürlüklerin taraf devletlerce ortadan kaldırılmasının veya dar olarak yorumlanmasının önüne geçilmektedir. Sözleşme sisteminde uzun yıllardır kullanılmakta olan özerk yorum, Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi tarafından da başvurulan bir yorum yöntemidir. Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi özerk yorum yaparken büyük çoğunlukla AİHM içtihatları doğrultusunda hareket etme eğilimindedir.

Makale detayları

Autonomous Interpretation in Individual Application in the Framework of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Turkish Constitutional Court

Yazarlar:

Ufuk Ramazan Çakmak

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 1, pp.199-226

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288854

pISSN:

1306-3839

Autonomous interpretation

power of discretion

dynamic interpretation

European Court of Human Rights

Constitutional Court.Özerk yorum

takdir yetkisi

dinamik yorum

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi

Anayasa Mahkemesi.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ufuk Ramazan Çakmak

Yayıncı: Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 1, pp.199-226

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001288854

pISSN: 1306-3839

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ufuk Ramazan Çakmak

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.18 Issue 1, pp.199-226

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288854

pISSN:

1306-3839