Complication Rates and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Nuran Yanıkoglu; Derya Aslan; Merve Köseoğlu

Makale detayları

Complication Rates and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Yazarlar:

Nuran Yanıkoglu | Derya Aslan | Merve Köseoğlu

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Prosthodontics

Dergi:

Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.42-47

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345481

pISSN:

2148-7529

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Background: The aim of the study was to assess implant and prosthetic failure rates and patients evaluations following 2-year observation. Methods: The study was conducted among 110 patients 60 male, 50 female. During recall visits during the first and second year of prosthesis insertion, researchers conducted the clinical examination. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients satisfaction with the prostheses. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-Square, Mann-Witney, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis α0.05. Results: In the maxilla and the mandible, the most commonly used prosthesis was cement-retained fixed partial dentures 31.4 and 29.6, respectively, while the least common procedures were full arch screw retained attachments 2.9 and 3.5, respectively. The most commonly used material was metal-ceramic 64.2. Survival rates of implants were similar in the maxilla 94.7 and the mandible 95.2 P0.544. Prosthesis survival rates were also similar P0.094: 76.2 were in the maxilla, and 78.3 were in the mandible. The highest technical and mechanical complication rates were observed in partial fixed denture prostheses inserted in the maxilla and the mandible 26.8 and 25.6, respectively. In the maxilla and mandible, the most frequent complication was ceramic chipping 16.2 and 15.6, respectively, followed by occlusal screw loosening 3.8 and 2.6, respectively. Patients satisfaction rates ranged between 91-95 in terms of function, aesthetics, and convenience. Conclusion: After a use time of 2 years, high survival rates and patient satisfaction ratings were obtained. There was no significant difference in implant failures, while prosthetic failures were higher in fixed partial dentures. Keywords: Dental implants, dentist, mandible, maxilla.

 Background: The aim of the study was to assess implant and prosthetic failure rates and patients evaluations following 2-year observation. Methods: The study was conducted among 110 patients 60 male, 50 female. During recall visits during the first and second year of prosthesis insertion, researchers conducted the clinical examination. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients satisfaction with the prostheses. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-Square, Mann-Witney, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis α0.05. Results: In the maxilla and the mandible, the most commonly used prosthesis was cement-retained fixed partial dentures 31.4 and 29.6, respectively, while the least common procedures were full arch screw retained attachments 2.9 and 3.5, respectively. The most commonly used material was metal-ceramic 64.2. Survival rates of implants were similar in the maxilla 94.7 and the mandible 95.2 P0.544. Prosthesis survival rates were also similar P0.094: 76.2 were in the maxilla, and 78.3 were in the mandible. The highest technical and mechanical complication rates were observed in partial fixed denture prostheses inserted in the maxilla and the mandible 26.8 and 25.6, respectively. In the maxilla and mandible, the most frequent complication was ceramic chipping 16.2 and 15.6, respectively, followed by occlusal screw loosening 3.8 and 2.6, respectively. Patients satisfaction rates ranged between 91-95 in terms of function, aesthetics, and convenience. Conclusion: After a use time of 2 years, high survival rates and patient satisfaction ratings were obtained. There was no significant difference in implant failures, while prosthetic failures were higher in fixed partial dentures. Keywords: Dental implants, dentist, mandible, maxilla.

 Background: The aim of the study was to assess implant and prosthetic failure rates and patients evaluations following 2-year observation. Methods: The study was conducted among 110 patients 60 male, 50 female. During recall visits during the first and second year of prosthesis insertion, researchers conducted the clinical examination. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients satisfaction with the prostheses. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-Square, Mann-Witney, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis α0.05. Results: In the maxilla and the mandible, the most commonly used prosthesis was cement-retained fixed partial dentures 31.4 and 29.6, respectively, while the least common procedures were full arch screw retained attachments 2.9 and 3.5, respectively. The most commonly used material was metal-ceramic 64.2. Survival rates of implants were similar in the maxilla 94.7 and the mandible 95.2 P0.544. Prosthesis survival rates were also similar P0.094: 76.2 were in the maxilla, and 78.3 were in the mandible. The highest technical and mechanical complication rates were observed in partial fixed denture prostheses inserted in the maxilla and the mandible 26.8 and 25.6, respectively. In the maxilla and mandible, the most frequent complication was ceramic chipping 16.2 and 15.6, respectively, followed by occlusal screw loosening 3.8 and 2.6, respectively. Patients satisfaction rates ranged between 91-95 in terms of function, aesthetics, and convenience. Conclusion: After a use time of 2 years, high survival rates and patient satisfaction ratings were obtained. There was no significant difference in implant failures, while prosthetic failures were higher in fixed partial dentures. Keywords: Dental implants, dentist, mandible, maxilla.

 Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, 2 yıllık gözlemin ardından implant ve implant üstü protezlerdeki başarısızlık oranlarını ve hastaların memnuniyet oranlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma 110 hasta 60 erkek, 50 kadın üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Protezler hasta ağzına takıldıktan bir ve iki yıl sınra yapılan kontrol ziyaretleri sırasında araştırmacılar klinik muayeneleri gerçekleştirmiştir. Hastaların protez memnuniyetlerini değerlendirmek için de bir anket kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Ki-Kare, Mann-Witney ve Kruskal-Wallis analizleri ile analiz edilmiştir α0.05. Bulgular: Maksilla ve mandibulada en sık kullanılan protez siman tutuculu sabit protezler sırasıyla 31,4 ve 29,6 iken, en az kullanılan tip tam ark vida tutuculu protezlerdir sırasıyla 2,9 ve 3,5. En yaygın kullanılan materyal metal-seramiktir 64,2. İmplantların sağkalım oranları maksilla 94,7 ve mandibulada 95,2 benzerdir P0,544. Protez sağkalım oranları da benzerdir P0.094. Maksilladaki protezlerin 76,2si ve mandibuldaki protezlerin 78,3ü sağ kalmıştır. En yüksek teknik ve mekanik komplikasyon oranları maksilla ve mandibulaya yerleştirilen sabit protezlerde gözlenmiştir sırasıyla 26,8 ve 25,6. Maksilla ve mandibulada en sık görülen komplikasyon seramikte çatlak oluşumu sırasıyla 16,2 ve 15,6 ve bunu takiben oklüzal vida gevşemesi sırasıyla 3,8 ve 2,6 olmuştur. Hastaların memnuniyet oranları fonksiyon, estetik ve kullanım kolaylığı açısından 91-95 arasında değişmektedir. Sonuç: İki yıllık kullanım süresinin ardından, yüksek sağkalım oranları ve hasta memnuniyet dereceleri elde edilmiştir. İmplant başarısızlıklarında anlamlı bir fark görülmezken, protez başarısızlıkları sabit protezlerde daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Dental implant, diş hekimi, maksilla, mandibula.

Makale detayları

Complication Rates and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Yazarlar:

Nuran Yanıkoglu | Derya Aslan | Merve Köseoğlu

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Prosthodontics

Dergi:

Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.42-47

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345481

pISSN:

2148-7529

Dental implants

dentist

mandible

maxillaDental implant

diş hekimi

maksilla

mandibula

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Nuran Yanıkoglu | Derya Aslan | Merve Köseoğlu

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Prosthodontics

Dergi: Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.42-47

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2025

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001345481

pISSN: 2148-7529

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Nuran Yanıkoglu | Derya Aslan | Merve Köseoğlu

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Prosthodontics

Dergi:

Selcuk Dental Journal Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.42-47

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345481

pISSN:

2148-7529