REFLECTIONS OF SOCIAL PROCEDURAL LAW  ON CIVIL PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE LAW

Efe Dırenisa

Makale detayları

REFLECTIONS OF SOCIAL PROCEDURAL LAW ON CIVIL PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE LAW

Yazarlar:

Efe Dırenisa

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 2, pp.905-938

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001358582

pISSN:

1301-1308

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Under the efforts of Franz Klein, the social conception of procedural lawreflected in the 1895 Austrian Code and supporting an active judicial rolespread to other legal systems as conditions and needs evolved. Law No. 6100 on Civil Procedure CCP also has reflections of this approach. Some principles are criticized on the grounds that they weaken this understanding. However, when the articles and principles in our law are evaluated as a whole with their purposes and exceptions, it is concluded that the social conception of procedural law is reflected in various provisions of the CCP. In this study, firstly, the emergence and development of the social procedural law conception will be discussed, and then some reflections of this conception on procedural law and substantive law will be mentioned. In this context, the regulations in the civil jurisdiction will be prioritized; the connection of the principles of litigation in the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure with the conception of social procedural law will be examined and the impact of this conception on the law of evidence will be analyzed. Relevant legal regulations from other fields will also be considered where applicable.

 Under the efforts of Franz Klein, the social conception of procedural lawreflected in the 1895 Austrian Code and supporting an active judicial rolespread to other legal systems as conditions and needs evolved. Law No. 6100 on Civil Procedure CCP also has reflections of this approach. Some principles are criticized on the grounds that they weaken this understanding. However, when the articles and principles in our law are evaluated as a whole with their purposes and exceptions, it is concluded that the social conception of procedural law is reflected in various provisions of the CCP. In this study, firstly, the emergence and development of the social procedural law conception will be discussed, and then some reflections of this conception on procedural law and substantive law will be mentioned. In this context, the regulations in the civil jurisdiction will be prioritized; the connection of the principles of litigation in the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure with the conception of social procedural law will be examined and the impact of this conception on the law of evidence will be analyzed. Relevant legal regulations from other fields will also be considered where applicable.

 Under the efforts of Franz Klein, the social conception of procedural lawreflected in the 1895 Austrian Code and supporting an active judicial rolespread to other legal systems as conditions and needs evolved. Law No. 6100 on Civil Procedure CCP also has reflections of this approach. Some principles are criticized on the grounds that they weaken this understanding. However, when the articles and principles in our law are evaluated as a whole with their purposes and exceptions, it is concluded that the social conception of procedural law is reflected in various provisions of the CCP. In this study, firstly, the emergence and development of the social procedural law conception will be discussed, and then some reflections of this conception on procedural law and substantive law will be mentioned. In this context, the regulations in the civil jurisdiction will be prioritized; the connection of the principles of litigation in the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure with the conception of social procedural law will be examined and the impact of this conception on the law of evidence will be analyzed. Relevant legal regulations from other fields will also be considered where applicable.

 İlk defa Avusturyalı ünlü hukukçu Franz Kleinın öncülüğünde, 1895 tarihli Avusturya Medenî Usûl Kanunuyla normatif temele kavuşan ve yargılamada hâkimin aktif role sahip olması gerektiğini savunan sosyal usûl hukuku anlayışı, değişen zaman ve ihtiyaçlarla birlikte diğer devletlerin kanunlarına da girmiştir. 6100 sayılı Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununda HMK da bu anlayışın yansımaları mevcuttur. Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunundaki bazı ilkeler ise bu anlayışı zayıflattığı gerekçesiyle eleştiri konusu olmuştur. Ancak Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun farklı düzenlemeleri ile ilkeleri, bunların amaçları ve istisnalarıyla bir bütün olarak değerlendirildiğinde, sosyal usûl hukuku anlayışının Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun çeşitli hükümlerinde kabul edilmiş olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle sosyal usûl hukuku anlayışının ortaya çıkışı ve gelişimi ele alınacak, sonrasında bu anlayışın usûl hukuku ile maddî hukuka bazı yansımalarına değinilecektir. Bu kapsamda öncelik medenî yargıdaki düzenlemelere yer verilecek; özellikle Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunundaki yargılama ilkelerinin sosyal usûl hukuku anlayışıyla bağlantısı irdelenecek ve bu anlayışın ispat hukuku alanındaki etkisi incelenecektir. Yeri geldikçe hukukumuzun farklı alanlarına ilişkin sosyal usûl hukuku anlayışıyla uyumlu düzenlemelere temas edilecektir.

Makale detayları

REFLECTIONS OF SOCIAL PROCEDURAL LAW ON CIVIL PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE LAW

Yazarlar:

Efe Dırenisa

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 2, pp.905-938

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001358582

pISSN:

1301-1308

Social procedural law approach

Procedural law

Substantive law

Principle of ex officio investigation

The right to a fair trialSosyal usûl hukuku anlayışı

Usûl hukuku

Maddî hukuk

Kendiliğinden araştırma ilkesi

Hakkaniyete uygun yargılama

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Efe Dırenisa

Yayıncı: Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 2, pp.905-938

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001358582

pISSN: 1301-1308

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Efe Dırenisa

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.74 Issue 2, pp.905-938

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001358582

pISSN:

1301-1308