Application Area and Scope of the Principle of Social Risk

Nemetullah Agahabaleı Fanıd

Makale detayları

Application Area and Scope of the Principle of Social Risk

Yazarlar:

Nemetullah Agahabaleı Fanıd

Yayıncı:

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Ana Başlıklar:

International Law

Dergi:

Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty Vol.11 Issue 2, pp.904-922

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321778

pISSN:

2149-1658

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The administration can only be subjected to financial liability due to its nature and structure as a legal entity. As a requirement of the rule of law principle, the compensation of damages arising from the execution of public services by the administration is evaluated within the theory of service fault. However, the financial liability of the administration is not limited to service fault. As a requirement of the social state principle, in addition to the principle of balancing the sacrifice, there is also the strict liability of the administration based on the principle of danger or risk. If the administration causes damage while engaging in dangerous activities or using hazardous vehicles, it is held liable even in the absence of fault. Nonetheless, the characteristic that distinguishes social risk liability from the principle of strict liability is that the causal link between the damage and the administrative activity is not sought. The social risk principle ensures that the administration is held strictly liable for damages caused by actions of anarchy and terrorism that disrupt public order.

 The administration can only be subjected to financial liability due to its nature and structure as a legal entity. As a requirement of the rule of law principle, the compensation of damages arising from the execution of public services by the administration is evaluated within the theory of service fault. However, the financial liability of the administration is not limited to service fault. As a requirement of the social state principle, in addition to the principle of balancing the sacrifice, there is also the strict liability of the administration based on the principle of danger or risk. If the administration causes damage while engaging in dangerous activities or using hazardous vehicles, it is held liable even in the absence of fault. Nonetheless, the characteristic that distinguishes social risk liability from the principle of strict liability is that the causal link between the damage and the administrative activity is not sought. The social risk principle ensures that the administration is held strictly liable for damages caused by actions of anarchy and terrorism that disrupt public order.

 The administration can only be subjected to financial liability due to its nature and structure as a legal entity. As a requirement of the rule of law principle, the compensation of damages arising from the execution of public services by the administration is evaluated within the theory of service fault. However, the financial liability of the administration is not limited to service fault. As a requirement of the social state principle, in addition to the principle of balancing the sacrifice, there is also the strict liability of the administration based on the principle of danger or risk. If the administration causes damage while engaging in dangerous activities or using hazardous vehicles, it is held liable even in the absence of fault. Nonetheless, the characteristic that distinguishes social risk liability from the principle of strict liability is that the causal link between the damage and the administrative activity is not sought. The social risk principle ensures that the administration is held strictly liable for damages caused by actions of anarchy and terrorism that disrupt public order.

 The administration can only be subjected to financial liability due to its nature and structure as a legal entity. As a requirement of the rule of law principle, the compensation of damages arising from the execution of public services by the administration is evaluated within the theory of service fault. However, the financial liability of the administration is not limited to service fault. As a requirement of the social state principle, in addition to the principle of balancing the sacrifice, there is also the strict liability of the administration based on the principle of danger or risk. If the administration causes damage while engaging in dangerous activities or using hazardous vehicles, it is held liable even in the absence of fault. Nonetheless, the characteristic that distinguishes social risk liability from the principle of strict liability is that the causal link between the damage and the administrative activity is not sought. The social risk principle ensures that the administration is held strictly liable for damages caused by actions of anarchy and terrorism that disrupt public order.

Makale detayları

Application Area and Scope of the Principle of Social Risk

Yazarlar:

Nemetullah Agahabaleı Fanıd

Yayıncı:

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Ana Başlıklar:

International Law

Dergi:

Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty Vol.11 Issue 2, pp.904-922

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321778

pISSN:

2149-1658

Financial responsibility of the administration

Conditions of responsibility

Defective responsibility

Service defect

Conditions of service defect

Sayı

Makale detayları

Application Area and Scope of the Principle of Social Risk

Yazarlar: Nemetullah Agahabaleı Fanıd

Yayıncı: Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Ana Başlıklar: International Law

Dergi: Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty Vol.11 Issue 2, pp.904-922

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321778

pISSN: 2149-1658

Financial responsibility of the administration

Conditions of responsibility

Defective responsibility

Service defect

Conditions of service defect

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Nemetullah Agahabaleı Fanıd

Yayıncı:

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Ana Başlıklar:

International Law

Dergi:

Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty Vol.11 Issue 2, pp.904-922

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321778

pISSN:

2149-1658