AA Comparison of The Evidences of Fürūʻ al-Fiqh: The Case of Ruūsü’l-masāil by Zamakhsharī

Yasin Erden

Makale detayları

AA Comparison of The Evidences of Fürūʻ al-Fiqh: The Case of Ruūsü’l-masāil by Zamakhsharī

Yazarlar:

Yasin Erden

Yayıncı:

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Kilitbahir Issue 27, pp.50-62

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001358774

pISSN:

2687-2692

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 ʻIlm al-khilāf constitutes the basic of theory of Comparative Islamic Law. This field of science aims to examine the differences of opinion that arisen among madhabs and the evidences on which they are based. One of the important books on the ʻIlm al-khilāf is Zamakhsharīs Ruūsül-masāil. His book has been accepted as one of the first examples of ʻIlm al-khilāf literature. This book contains the controversial fiqhī matters that occurred between the Hanafīs and Shāfiʻīs. This book also touchs on some issues that arent dispute between the these two madhabs. In addition, Mālikī madhabs opinion mentioned in three matters. There isnt dispute on matters that are accurate signification and accurate presence between the madhabs such as fardiyat of prayer and fasting. Zamakhsharīs Ruūsül-masāil doesnt touch generally on subjects like this. The present article examines issues such as the comparison of the Hanafīs and Shāfiʻīs evidences, the place of Ruūsül-masāil within the ʻIlm al-khilāf, which the type of evidences mentioned by author, what is the Zamakhsharīs madhab, whether he has a tendency to defend his own madhab. As a result of this research is the general framework of the evidences mentioned by Zamakhsharī in the Ruūsül-masāil can be classified as follows: 1. Transferred Evidences. a Âyah. b Hadīth. c Ijmāʻ. 2. Rational Evidences. a The âyah brought with the aim of giving legitimacy to judgment. b The hadīth brought with the aim of giving legitimacy to judgment. c General rules. d Matters evaluated under a rule Here, matter adjudicated is likened to matter evaluated under a rule. e İnterpretation.

 ʻIlm al-khilāf constitutes the basic of theory of Comparative Islamic Law. This field of science aims to examine the differences of opinion that arisen among madhabs and the evidences on which they are based. One of the important books on the ʻIlm al-khilāf is Zamakhsharīs Ruūsül-masāil. His book has been accepted as one of the first examples of ʻIlm al-khilāf literature. This book contains the controversial fiqhī matters that occurred between the Hanafīs and Shāfiʻīs. This book also touchs on some issues that arent dispute between the these two madhabs. In addition, Mālikī madhabs opinion mentioned in three matters. There isnt dispute on matters that are accurate signification and accurate presence between the madhabs such as fardiyat of prayer and fasting. Zamakhsharīs Ruūsül-masāil doesnt touch generally on subjects like this. The present article examines issues such as the comparison of the Hanafīs and Shāfiʻīs evidences, the place of Ruūsül-masāil within the ʻIlm al-khilāf, which the type of evidences mentioned by author, what is the Zamakhsharīs madhab, whether he has a tendency to defend his own madhab. As a result of this research is the general framework of the evidences mentioned by Zamakhsharī in the Ruūsül-masāil can be classified as follows: 1. Transferred Evidences. a Âyah. b Hadīth. c Ijmāʻ. 2. Rational Evidences. a The âyah brought with the aim of giving legitimacy to judgment. b The hadīth brought with the aim of giving legitimacy to judgment. c General rules. d Matters evaluated under a rule Here, matter adjudicated is likened to matter evaluated under a rule. e İnterpretation.

 ʻIlm al-khilāf constitutes the basic of theory of Comparative Islamic Law. This field of science aims to examine the differences of opinion that arisen among madhabs and the evidences on which they are based. One of the important books on the ʻIlm al-khilāf is Zamakhsharīs Ruūsül-masāil. His book has been accepted as one of the first examples of ʻIlm al-khilāf literature. This book contains the controversial fiqhī matters that occurred between the Hanafīs and Shāfiʻīs. This book also touchs on some issues that arent dispute between the these two madhabs. In addition, Mālikī madhabs opinion mentioned in three matters. There isnt dispute on matters that are accurate signification and accurate presence between the madhabs such as fardiyat of prayer and fasting. Zamakhsharīs Ruūsül-masāil doesnt touch generally on subjects like this. The present article examines issues such as the comparison of the Hanafīs and Shāfiʻīs evidences, the place of Ruūsül-masāil within the ʻIlm al-khilāf, which the type of evidences mentioned by author, what is the Zamakhsharīs madhab, whether he has a tendency to defend his own madhab. As a result of this research is the general framework of the evidences mentioned by Zamakhsharī in the Ruūsül-masāil can be classified as follows: 1. Transferred Evidences. a Âyah. b Hadīth. c Ijmāʻ. 2. Rational Evidences. a The âyah brought with the aim of giving legitimacy to judgment. b The hadīth brought with the aim of giving legitimacy to judgment. c General rules. d Matters evaluated under a rule Here, matter adjudicated is likened to matter evaluated under a rule. e İnterpretation.

 İlm-i hilâf, Mukayeseli İslâm Hukuku teorisinin temelini teşkil etmektedir. Bu ilim dalı, mezhepler arasında ortaya çıkan görüş ayrılıklarını ve bunların dayandığı delilleri ele almayı hedefler. İlm-i hilâfa dair telif edilmiş önemli eserlerden biri, Zemahşerînin Ruûsül-mesâil adlı çalışmasıdır. Onun eseri, İlm-i hilâf literatürünün ilk örneklerinden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu kitap, Hanefîler ile Şâfiîler arasında cereyan eden ihtilaflı fıkhî meseleleri içermektedir. Ayrıca bu iki mezhep arasında ihtilaf bulunmayan bazı meselelere de temas etmektedir. Bununla birlikte, üç meselede Mâlikî mezhebine ait görüş zikredilmektedir. Namazın ve orucun farziyeti gibi sübûtu ve delâleti kesin olan meselelerde mezhepler arasında herhangi bir ihtilaf yoktur. Zemahşerînin Ruûsül-mesâili, genel olarak bu tür konulara değinmemektir. Bu makalede Hanefîler ile Şâfiîlerin fürû-ı fıkıh delillerinin karşılaştırılması, Ruûsül-mesâilin İlm-i hilâf literatürü içindeki yeri, müellifin hangi delil türlerine yer verdiği, Zemahşerînin mezhebi mensubiyeti, mezhebini savunma eğiliminde olup olmadığı gibi hususlar ele alınmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın bir sonucu olarak Zemahşerînin Ruûsül-mesâilde zikrettiği delillerin genel çerçevesi aşağıdaki şekilde tasnif edilebilir: 1. Naklî Deliller: a Âyet. b Hadis. c İcmâ. 2. Aklî Deliller: a Hükme meşruiyet kazandırma amacıyla getirilen âyet. b Hükme meşruiyet kazandırma amacıyla getirilen hadis. c Genel kaideler. d Bir esasa göre ortaya konan meseleler Bu bağlamda bir mesele, benzerlik ilişkisi kurularak bir başka meseleye tâbi kılınmaktadır. e Yorum.

Makale detayları

AA Comparison of The Evidences of Fürūʻ al-Fiqh: The Case of Ruūsü’l-masāil by Zamakhsharī

Yazarlar:

Yasin Erden

Yayıncı:

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Kilitbahir Issue 27, pp.50-62

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001358774

pISSN:

2687-2692

Fiqh

ʻIlm al-Khilāf

Zamakhsharî

Hanefī Madhab

Shāfiʻī Madhab

EvidenceFıkıh

İlm-i Hilâf

Zemahşerî

Hanefî Mezhebi

Şâfiî Mezhebi

Delil

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Yasin Erden

Yayıncı: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Kilitbahir Issue 27, pp.50-62

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001358774

pISSN: 2687-2692

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Yasin Erden

Yayıncı:

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Kilitbahir Issue 27, pp.50-62

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001358774

pISSN:

2687-2692