EVALUATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS' EXPERTISE PRACTICES FROM JUDGES' PERSPECTIVES

Nur Feyzal Kesen; Özkan Bilgin

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS' EXPERTISE PRACTICES FROM JUDGES' PERSPECTIVES

Yazarlar:

Nur Feyzal Kesen | Özkan Bilgin

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sosyoloji (Diğer)

Dergi:

Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Vol.34 Issue 2, pp.469-488

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288813

pISSN:

2147-3374

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Forensic social workers work as experts in the investigation processes and courts within the judiciary and influence the judicial decisions with their expert knowledge. The main purpose of this research is to examine the expertise of forensic social workers from the perspective of judges. 60 judges working in the judiciary participated in the research. In the collection of research data, a questionnaire consisting of 13 questions prepared by the researchers was filled in face-to-face interviews and answers were sought. In the research, which was designed as a survey model research, the answers obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 21 package program and the data were analyzed in the form of frequency distributions. According to the results of the research; child in need of protection, juvenile delinquent, custody arrangement, establishment of personal relations, violation of obligations arising from family law, adoption and guardian It has been found that the opinions and evaluations of the forensic social workers are sought in the appointment of experts and that forensic social workers are inadequate in various aspects while fulfilling their expert duties. In line with the findings obtained, some suggestions for the solution of the problem were presented.

 Forensic social workers work as experts in the investigation processes and courts within the judiciary and influence the judicial decisions with their expert knowledge. The main purpose of this research is to examine the expertise of forensic social workers from the perspective of judges. 60 judges working in the judiciary participated in the research. In the collection of research data, a questionnaire consisting of 13 questions prepared by the researchers was filled in face-to-face interviews and answers were sought. In the research, which was designed as a survey model research, the answers obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 21 package program and the data were analyzed in the form of frequency distributions. According to the results of the research; child in need of protection, juvenile delinquent, custody arrangement, establishment of personal relations, violation of obligations arising from family law, adoption and guardian It has been found that the opinions and evaluations of the forensic social workers are sought in the appointment of experts and that forensic social workers are inadequate in various aspects while fulfilling their expert duties. In line with the findings obtained, some suggestions for the solution of the problem were presented.

 Forensic social workers work as experts in the investigation processes and courts within the judiciary and influence the judicial decisions with their expert knowledge. The main purpose of this research is to examine the expertise of forensic social workers from the perspective of judges. 60 judges working in the judiciary participated in the research. In the collection of research data, a questionnaire consisting of 13 questions prepared by the researchers was filled in face-to-face interviews and answers were sought. In the research, which was designed as a survey model research, the answers obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 21 package program and the data were analyzed in the form of frequency distributions. According to the results of the research; child in need of protection, juvenile delinquent, custody arrangement, establishment of personal relations, violation of obligations arising from family law, adoption and guardian It has been found that the opinions and evaluations of the forensic social workers are sought in the appointment of experts and that forensic social workers are inadequate in various aspects while fulfilling their expert duties. In line with the findings obtained, some suggestions for the solution of the problem were presented.

 Adli sosyal çalışmacılar, yargı içerisinde soruşturma süreçlerinde ve mahkemelerde bilirkişi olarak görev yapmaktadır ve uzmanlık bilgisi ile yaptığı değerlendirmelerle yargı kararlarına etki etmektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı adli sosyal çalışmacıların bilirkişilik görevlerini hâkimlerin bakış açısıyla incelemektir. Araştırmaya adli yargıda görev yapan 60 hâkim katılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin toplanmasında araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan ve 13 sorudan oluşan soru formu yüz yüze yapılan görüşmelerle doldurularak yanıtlar aranmaya çalışılmıştır. Tarama modelli bir araştırma şeklinde tasarlanan araştırmada, elde edilen yanıtlar SPSS 21 paket programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve veriler frekans dağılımları şeklinde analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucuna göre; adli sosyal çalışmacılardan mahkemelerde sözlü değerlendirme yaparak ve rapor düzenleyerek bilirkişilik yaptığı, bilirkişi olarak düzenledikleri raporların mahkeme kararlarına önemli düzeyde etki ettiği, korunmaya ihtiyacı olan çocuk, suça sürüklenen çocuk, velayet düzenlemesi, kişisel ilişki kurulması, aile hukukundan doğan yükümlülüğün ihlali, evlat edinme ve vasi tayini konularında bilirkişi olarak görüş ve değerlendirmelerine başvurulduğu ve adli sosyal çalışmacıların bilirkişilik görevlerini yerine getirirken çeşitli hususlarda yetersiz kaldıkları bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda sorunun çözümüne yönelik bazı öneriler sunulmuştur.

Makale detayları

EVALUATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS' EXPERTISE PRACTICES FROM JUDGES' PERSPECTIVES

Yazarlar:

Nur Feyzal Kesen | Özkan Bilgin

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sosyoloji (Diğer)

Dergi:

Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Vol.34 Issue 2, pp.469-488

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288813

pISSN:

2147-3374

forensic social work

trial process

expert witness

expert reportsadli sosyal çalışma

yargılama süreci

bilirkişilik

bilirkişi raporları

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Nur Feyzal Kesen | Özkan Bilgin

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Sosyoloji (Diğer)

Dergi: Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Vol.34 Issue 2, pp.469-488

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001288813

pISSN: 2147-3374

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Nur Feyzal Kesen | Özkan Bilgin

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sosyoloji (Diğer)

Dergi:

Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Vol.34 Issue 2, pp.469-488

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001288813

pISSN:

2147-3374