MET Sistemi ve Dinlenik Metabolik Hızın Kestirilmesinde Sensewear Pro3 Armband’ın Geçerliği

Tahir HAZIR; Ayşe KİN İŞLER; Mehmet Gören KÖSE; Ceren İşıl ATABEY; Betül COŞKUN; Ferhat ESATBEYOĞLU

Makale detayları

MET Sistemi ve Dinlenik Metabolik Hızın Kestirilmesinde Sensewear Pro3 Armband’ın Geçerliği

Yazarlar:

Tahir HAZIR | Ayşe KİN İŞLER | Mehmet Gören KÖSE | Ceren İşıl ATABEY | Betül COŞKUN | Ferhat ESATBEYOĞLU

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık teşvikleri | Sosyoloji & antropoloji

Dergi:

Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences 2017 Vol.28 Issue 3, pp.128-134

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2017

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000628735

Sıklık:

Üç Aylık

eISSN:

2667-6672

Özet:

 


One metabolic equivalent (MET) corresponds to

3.5 ml.kg-1.min-1 VO2 and is accepted as the resting

metabolic rate (RMR). However, there have been arguments

related with VO2 equivalent of 1 MET (3.5 ml.kg-1.

min-1); some arguments indicated that this value is relatively

high and may lead to misclassification of physical

activities. The present study has 3 purposes: 1. to

determine the validity of SenseWear Armband (SWA)

in predicting RMR; 2. to assess the differences between

the MET system and RMRs determined by SWA and indirect

calorimetry (IC) and 3. to evaluate the associations

between body composition and RMRs determined

by the two methods. Twenty-eight men and women

(age range:25-55 yrs) participated in the study voluntarily.

RMR was determined by IC by measuring VO2

and CO2. Energy consumption was recorded simultaneously

with SWA. Caloric equivalent of VO2 was determined

by Weir’s equation (1949). Differences between 1

MET and SWA-measured MET values and between resting

VO2 measured by IC and 3.5 ml.kg-1.min-1 were de-

termined by One-Sample t-test; differences between the

two methods were determined by Paired-Samples t- test;

and associations between the variables were determined

by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. SWA-measured MET

(1.0  0.12) was equal to 1 MET (p > 0.05), whereas IC-measured

MET (0.83  0.16) was lower than 1 MET (p0.05).

Although significant correlation (p<0.01) was found between

RMRs (kcal.day-1) measured by the two methods,

SWA-measured RMR was higher than IC-measured RMR

(p<0.05). Significant correlations were found between

both IC and SWA-measured RMRs and body weight, body

mass index and lean body mass (p<0.05). Results of this

study showed that; RMR measured by IC was significantly

lower than 1 MET, SWA overestimated RMR compared to

IC method, and LBM was the most significant body composition

component associated with RMRs determined

by both methods.

.

Makale detayları

MET Sistemi ve Dinlenik Metabolik Hızın Kestirilmesinde Sensewear Pro3 Armband’ın Geçerliği

Yazarlar: Tahir HAZIR | Ayşe KİN İŞLER | Mehmet Gören KÖSE | Ceren İşıl ATABEY | Betül COŞKUN | Ferhat ESATBEYOĞLU

Yayıncı: Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar: Sağlık teşvikleri | Sosyoloji & antropoloji

Dergi: Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences 2017 Vol.28 Issue 3, pp.128-134

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 11/2017

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2000628735

Sıklık: Üç Aylık

eISSN: 2667-6672

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Tahir HAZIR | Ayşe KİN İŞLER | Mehmet Gören KÖSE | Ceren İşıl ATABEY | Betül COŞKUN | Ferhat ESATBEYOĞLU

Yayıncı:

Hacettepe University

Ana Başlıklar:

Sağlık teşvikleri | Sosyoloji & antropoloji

Dergi:

Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences 2017 Vol.28 Issue 3, pp.128-134

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

11/2017

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000628735

Sıklık:

Üç Aylık

eISSN:

2667-6672