FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE

Ramazan Çağlayan

Makale detayları

FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE

Yazarlar:

Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı:

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Dergi:

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.31-62

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350343

pISSN:

2651-494X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The most basic function expected from judicial decisions is to convince the parties of the judgment. The writing style or form of the judgments is important both for the satisfaction of the parties to the case and for the legal effect of the judgments. The laws on the Council of State and administrative procedure do not contain any rules on the style and form of judicial decisions. As is known, the Council of State started to operate in 1927 during the republican era and started to issue judicial decisions in the early 1930s. Since these years, a certain procedure has been established in terms of the writing style and form of decisions. Today it continues to be written in the same style and form. During this period of nearly 90 years, significant changes have taken place in the field of law and the judiciary. It is observed that these changes are not reflected in the style and form of judicial decisions. However, it cannot be said that the style and form of writing in the 1930s has remained unchanged. he Council of States 2018 Guidelines on the drafting of decisions was the first serious development on this issue. In this study, we will discuss the historical process of the formal structure of the decisions of the Council of State, its current status and what it should be. In this context, we will focus on 1 the reference to the legitimacy of the judgments, 2 the issues to be included in the judgments, 3 the sections of the judgments, 4 the way the judgments are written headings, paragraphs, sentence structure, etc..

 The most basic function expected from judicial decisions is to convince the parties of the judgment. The writing style or form of the judgments is important both for the satisfaction of the parties to the case and for the legal effect of the judgments. The laws on the Council of State and administrative procedure do not contain any rules on the style and form of judicial decisions. As is known, the Council of State started to operate in 1927 during the republican era and started to issue judicial decisions in the early 1930s. Since these years, a certain procedure has been established in terms of the writing style and form of decisions. Today it continues to be written in the same style and form. During this period of nearly 90 years, significant changes have taken place in the field of law and the judiciary. It is observed that these changes are not reflected in the style and form of judicial decisions. However, it cannot be said that the style and form of writing in the 1930s has remained unchanged. he Council of States 2018 Guidelines on the drafting of decisions was the first serious development on this issue. In this study, we will discuss the historical process of the formal structure of the decisions of the Council of State, its current status and what it should be. In this context, we will focus on 1 the reference to the legitimacy of the judgments, 2 the issues to be included in the judgments, 3 the sections of the judgments, 4 the way the judgments are written headings, paragraphs, sentence structure, etc..

 The most basic function expected from judicial decisions is to convince the parties of the judgment. The writing style or form of the judgments is important both for the satisfaction of the parties to the case and for the legal effect of the judgments. The laws on the Council of State and administrative procedure do not contain any rules on the style and form of judicial decisions. As is known, the Council of State started to operate in 1927 during the republican era and started to issue judicial decisions in the early 1930s. Since these years, a certain procedure has been established in terms of the writing style and form of decisions. Today it continues to be written in the same style and form. During this period of nearly 90 years, significant changes have taken place in the field of law and the judiciary. It is observed that these changes are not reflected in the style and form of judicial decisions. However, it cannot be said that the style and form of writing in the 1930s has remained unchanged. he Council of States 2018 Guidelines on the drafting of decisions was the first serious development on this issue. In this study, we will discuss the historical process of the formal structure of the decisions of the Council of State, its current status and what it should be. In this context, we will focus on 1 the reference to the legitimacy of the judgments, 2 the issues to be included in the judgments, 3 the sections of the judgments, 4 the way the judgments are written headings, paragraphs, sentence structure, etc..

 Yargı kararlarından beklenen en temel işlev, verilen hüküm konusunda tarafları ikna etmektir. Kararların yazım tarzı veya şekli, hem davanın taraflarının tatmini hem de kararların hukukî etkisi açısından önem arz etmektedir. Danıştay ve idarî yargılama usûlüne ilişkin kanunlarda, yargısal kararların yazım tarzı ve şekline ilişkin bir kural bulunmamaktadır. Bilindiği üzere Danıştay, cumhuriyet döneminde 1927 yılında fiilen çalışmaya başlamış ve 1930lu yılların başlarında yargısal kararlar vermeye başlamıştır. Bu yıllardan itibaren kararların yazım tarzı ve şekli konusunda belli bir usûl yerleşmiştir. Bugün aynı tarz ve şekille yazılmaya devam edilmektedir. Yaklaşık 90 yılı bulan bu zaman diliminde hukuk ve yargı alanında önemli değişiklikler meydana gelmiştir. Bu değişikliklerin yargı kararlarının yazım tarz ve şekline yansımadığı görülmektedir. Ancak 1930lu yıllardaki yazım tazı ve şeklinin hiç değişmeden devam ettiği de söylenemez. Kararların yazım şekline ilişkin Danıştayın 2018 tarihli Danıştay Karar Yazım Rehberi bu konuya ilişkin ilk ciddi gelişme olmuştur. Bu çalışmada Danıştay kararlarının şeklî yapısının tarihî süreci, bu günkü durumu ve olması gerekenler konusunu ele alacağız. Bu bağlamda; 1 kararların meşruiyetine yapılan atıf, 2 kararlarda bulunması gereken hususlar, 3 kararların bölümleri, 4 kararların yazım şekli başlıklar, paragraflar, cümle yapısı vs. üzerinde duracağız.

Makale detayları

FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE

Yazarlar:

Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı:

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Dergi:

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.31-62

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350343

pISSN:

2651-494X

Council of State

Decision

Form

Elements

Spelling guideDanıştay

Karar

Şekil

Unsurlar

Yazım Rehberi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı: Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Dergi: Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.31-62

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001350343

pISSN: 2651-494X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı:

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum

Dergi:

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.31-62

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350343

pISSN:

2651-494X