Life Cycle Assessment of Internal Wall Panels: A Case Study of Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory Restoration Process

Buket Metin

Makale detayları

Life Cycle Assessment of Internal Wall Panels: A Case Study of Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory Restoration Process

Yazarlar:

Buket Metin

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar:

Architectural Science and Technology | Materials and Technology in Architecture | Sustainable Architecture | Architecture

Dergi:

Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.345-354

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289981

pISSN:

2548-0170

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This study presents a case study that aims to select the ideal internal wall panel option causing less environmental impact for the Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory restoration process, which is now used as part of Abdullah Gul Universitys main campus. Since the university has an environmental agenda, examining the environmental impacts of the materials used for the ongoing restoration process has the potential to contribute to these goals. For this purpose, the three most used interior wall panels in the Turkish building material industry, gypsum, reinforced gypsum, and cement-based panels, were selected within the scope of the case study. The life cycle assessment LCA method was used to compare these options, and analyses were conducted using SimaPro software. The data required for life cycle impact assessment LCIA were obtained based on market analyses and also from the EcoInvent Life Cycle Inventory Database. At the end of the study, damage assessment, weighting, and midpoint and endpoint data of the characterization results provided by the ReCiPe method were compared and interpreted. According to the overall results obtained for the described case conditions, reinforced gypsum panel causes the most adverse environmental impacts, followed by cement and gypsum panels, respectively.

 This study presents a case study that aims to select the ideal internal wall panel option causing less environmental impact for the Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory restoration process, which is now used as part of Abdullah Gul Universitys main campus. Since the university has an environmental agenda, examining the environmental impacts of the materials used for the ongoing restoration process has the potential to contribute to these goals. For this purpose, the three most used interior wall panels in the Turkish building material industry, gypsum, reinforced gypsum, and cement-based panels, were selected within the scope of the case study. The life cycle assessment LCA method was used to compare these options, and analyses were conducted using SimaPro software. The data required for life cycle impact assessment LCIA were obtained based on market analyses and also from the EcoInvent Life Cycle Inventory Database. At the end of the study, damage assessment, weighting, and midpoint and endpoint data of the characterization results provided by the ReCiPe method were compared and interpreted. According to the overall results obtained for the described case conditions, reinforced gypsum panel causes the most adverse environmental impacts, followed by cement and gypsum panels, respectively.

 This study presents a case study that aims to select the ideal internal wall panel option causing less environmental impact for the Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory restoration process, which is now used as part of Abdullah Gul Universitys main campus. Since the university has an environmental agenda, examining the environmental impacts of the materials used for the ongoing restoration process has the potential to contribute to these goals. For this purpose, the three most used interior wall panels in the Turkish building material industry, gypsum, reinforced gypsum, and cement-based panels, were selected within the scope of the case study. The life cycle assessment LCA method was used to compare these options, and analyses were conducted using SimaPro software. The data required for life cycle impact assessment LCIA were obtained based on market analyses and also from the EcoInvent Life Cycle Inventory Database. At the end of the study, damage assessment, weighting, and midpoint and endpoint data of the characterization results provided by the ReCiPe method were compared and interpreted. According to the overall results obtained for the described case conditions, reinforced gypsum panel causes the most adverse environmental impacts, followed by cement and gypsum panels, respectively.

 Bu çalışma, günümüzde Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi yerleşkesinin bir parçası olarak kullanılan Sümerbank Kayseri Tekstil Fabrikası restorasyon süreci için çevresel etkiye daha az neden olan ideal iç duvar paneli seçeneğini belirlemeyi amaçlayan bir vaka çalışması sunmaktadır. Üniversitenin tanımlı çevresel hedefleri olduğu için, devam eden restorasyon sürecinde kullanılan malzemelerin çevresel etkilerinin incelenmesi, bu hedeflere katkı sağlama potansiyeline sahiptir. Bu amaçla vaka çalışması kapsamında Türk yapı malzemeleri sektöründe en çok kullanılan üç iç duvar paneli olan alçı, güçlendirilmiş alçı ve çimento esaslı paneller seçilmiştir. Bu seçenekleri karşılaştırmak için yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi YDD yöntemi kullanılmış ve analizler SimaPro yazılımı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Yaşam döngüsü etki değerlendirmesi için gereken veriler, piyasa araştırmasının yanı sıra EcoInvent Yaşam Döngüsü Envanter Veri Tabanından elde edilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda, ReCiPe yöntemi tarafından sağlanan hasar değerlendirmesi, ağırlıklandırma ve orta nokta ve bitiş noktası verilerini açıklayan karakterizasyon sonuçları karşılaştırılarak yorumlanmıştır. Örnek çalışma kapsamında elde edilen genel sonuçlara göre, güçlendirilmiş alçı panel en olumsuz çevresel etkilere sebep olurken, onu sırasıyla çimento paneller ve alçı paneller takip etmektedir.

Makale detayları

Life Cycle Assessment of Internal Wall Panels: A Case Study of Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory Restoration Process

Yazarlar:

Buket Metin

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar:

Architectural Science and Technology | Materials and Technology in Architecture | Sustainable Architecture | Architecture

Dergi:

Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.345-354

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289981

pISSN:

2548-0170

Ecosystem quality

human health

internal wall panels

life cycle assessment

resource useEkosistem kalitesi

insan sağlığı

iç duvar panelleri

yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi

kaynak kullanımı

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Buket Metin

Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar: Architectural Science and Technology | Materials and Technology in Architecture | Sustainable Architecture | Architecture

Dergi: Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.345-354

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001289981

pISSN: 2548-0170

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Buket Metin

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar:

Architectural Science and Technology | Materials and Technology in Architecture | Sustainable Architecture | Architecture

Dergi:

Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.345-354

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289981

pISSN:

2548-0170