A New Proposal for the Measurement of Criterion Weights in the Scope of Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Somer’s D-DEMATEL based Hybrid Approach (SDBHA)

Furkan Fahri Altıntaş

Makale detayları

A New Proposal for the Measurement of Criterion Weights in the Scope of Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Somer’s D-DEMATEL based Hybrid Approach (SDBHA)

Yazarlar:

Furkan Fahri Altıntaş

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

İstatistik (Diğer)

Dergi:

EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics Issue 40, pp.165-182

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324484

pISSN:

2651-396X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The obtained results underscore the effectiveness of the SDBHA in objectively determining criteria weights across various countries. Sensitivity and comparative analyses with other well-established methods, such as ENTROPY, CRITIC, SD, SVP, LOPCOW, and MEREC, were conducted to assess the sensitivity, credibility, and reliability of SDBHA. According to the findings, SDBHA is sensitive and close to a credible and reliable state. Remarkable observations include the effectiveness of SDBHA, as indicated by simulation analyses, in consistently distinguishing and determining criteria weights across various scenarios, demonstrating its stability and robustness. In conclusion, SDBHA emerges as a potent and objective criteria weighting technique, notably enhancing the DEMATEL method and providing significant contributions to the literature on MCDM.

 The obtained results underscore the effectiveness of the SDBHA in objectively determining criteria weights across various countries. Sensitivity and comparative analyses with other well-established methods, such as ENTROPY, CRITIC, SD, SVP, LOPCOW, and MEREC, were conducted to assess the sensitivity, credibility, and reliability of SDBHA. According to the findings, SDBHA is sensitive and close to a credible and reliable state. Remarkable observations include the effectiveness of SDBHA, as indicated by simulation analyses, in consistently distinguishing and determining criteria weights across various scenarios, demonstrating its stability and robustness. In conclusion, SDBHA emerges as a potent and objective criteria weighting technique, notably enhancing the DEMATEL method and providing significant contributions to the literature on MCDM.

 The obtained results underscore the effectiveness of the SDBHA in objectively determining criteria weights across various countries. Sensitivity and comparative analyses with other well-established methods, such as ENTROPY, CRITIC, SD, SVP, LOPCOW, and MEREC, were conducted to assess the sensitivity, credibility, and reliability of SDBHA. According to the findings, SDBHA is sensitive and close to a credible and reliable state. Remarkable observations include the effectiveness of SDBHA, as indicated by simulation analyses, in consistently distinguishing and determining criteria weights across various scenarios, demonstrating its stability and robustness. In conclusion, SDBHA emerges as a potent and objective criteria weighting technique, notably enhancing the DEMATEL method and providing significant contributions to the literature on MCDM.

 The obtained results underscore the effectiveness of the SDBHA in objectively determining criteria weights across various countries. Sensitivity and comparative analyses with other well-established methods, such as ENTROPY, CRITIC, SD, SVP, LOPCOW, and MEREC, were conducted to assess the sensitivity, credibility, and reliability of SDBHA. According to the findings, SDBHA is sensitive and close to a credible and reliable state. Remarkable observations include the effectiveness of SDBHA, as indicated by simulation analyses, in consistently distinguishing and determining criteria weights across various scenarios, demonstrating its stability and robustness. In conclusion, SDBHA emerges as a potent and objective criteria weighting technique, notably enhancing the DEMATEL method and providing significant contributions to the literature on MCDM.

Makale detayları

A New Proposal for the Measurement of Criterion Weights in the Scope of Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Somer’s D-DEMATEL based Hybrid Approach (SDBHA)

Yazarlar:

Furkan Fahri Altıntaş

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

İstatistik (Diğer)

Dergi:

EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics Issue 40, pp.165-182

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324484

pISSN:

2651-396X

MCDM

Somer’s D

DEMATEL

SDBHA

Criteria Weights

Sayı

Makale detayları

A New Proposal for the Measurement of Criterion Weights in the Scope of Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Somer’s D-DEMATEL based Hybrid Approach (SDBHA)

Yazarlar: Furkan Fahri Altıntaş

Yayıncı: Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar: İstatistik (Diğer)

Dergi: EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics Issue 40, pp.165-182

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001324484

pISSN: 2651-396X

MCDM

Somer’s D

DEMATEL

SDBHA

Criteria Weights

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Furkan Fahri Altıntaş

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

İstatistik (Diğer)

Dergi:

EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics Issue 40, pp.165-182

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324484

pISSN:

2651-396X