Hadıth Commentary Methodology In The Mālıkīs (Particular To Abū Al-Muṭarrif Al-Qanāziʻī And Hıs Book Tıtled Tafsīr Al-Muwaṭṭaʼ)

Uğur Erman

Makale detayları

Hadıth Commentary Methodology In The Mālıkīs (Particular To Abū Al-Muṭarrif Al-Qanāziʻī And Hıs Book Tıtled Tafsīr Al-Muwaṭṭaʼ)

Yazarlar:

Uğur Erman

Yayıncı:

Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Van İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 20, pp.74-91

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319561

pISSN:

2667-615X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Sunnah is an issue that Muslims pay special attention to it, since it is the second source of the religion of Islam. After the Prophets passing away, both the companions al-saḥāba and the successors tābiʻūn and tabaʻu al-tābiʻūn made extraordinary efforts to understand and interpret the Sunnah correctly. In fact, since the science of hadith is the common denominator in all fields of basic Islamic sciences, all scholars have tried to explain the transmission of hadith, the way it was narrated, whether the narrators were competent to narrate, the explanation of unknown words in the hadith, etc. Although it is possible to find this activity during the Prophets time, it continued in a semi-systematic manner over time, especially after the third century. After the fourth century of hijri, the hadith commentary sharḥ process took on a completely systematic character and the science of hadith commentary became a sub-discipline of the hadith department. The process of writing commentaries, which started in the Islamic world and became a tradition over time, concentrated on the books that established the dominance on Muslim society. In this framework, serious contributions were made to the commentary literature in the following periods of time and an enormous commentary literature was formed. However, in the formation of the hadith commentary literature, the sectarian affiliation of the commentator was one of the most influential factors in determining the content of the commentary. In this context, Imām Māliks study named al-Muwaṭṭaʼ and al-Kutub al-Sitta took the lead in the development of the hadith commentary literature. In particular, al-Imām Māliks al-Muwaṭṭaʼ attracted the attention of the scholars of Andalusia who were interested in the science of hadith, and scholarly trips were made to Medina, one of the eastern Islamic countries, for the education and training of hadith, and as a result of these trips, the people of Andalusia adopted the Mālikī sect. Therefore Imām Māliks study named al-Muwaṭṭaʼ became one of the most important books. In Andalusia, serious commentaries were written on the aforementioned study in almost every century starting from the third century of hijri. One of these commentaries is Abū al-Muṭarrif al-Qanāziʻīs study named Tafsīr al-Muwaṭṭaʼ, which is the subject of our research paper. There is no detached study on this study. For this reason, this study is important in terms of obtaining information about Andalusian hadith commentary. Likewise, it is expected that this study will also be a source of literature for comprehensive studies such as Maliki hadith commentarism and hadith methodology.

 Sunnah is an issue that Muslims pay special attention to it, since it is the second source of the religion of Islam. After the Prophets passing away, both the companions al-saḥāba and the successors tābiʻūn and tabaʻu al-tābiʻūn made extraordinary efforts to understand and interpret the Sunnah correctly. In fact, since the science of hadith is the common denominator in all fields of basic Islamic sciences, all scholars have tried to explain the transmission of hadith, the way it was narrated, whether the narrators were competent to narrate, the explanation of unknown words in the hadith, etc. Although it is possible to find this activity during the Prophets time, it continued in a semi-systematic manner over time, especially after the third century. After the fourth century of hijri, the hadith commentary sharḥ process took on a completely systematic character and the science of hadith commentary became a sub-discipline of the hadith department. The process of writing commentaries, which started in the Islamic world and became a tradition over time, concentrated on the books that established the dominance on Muslim society. In this framework, serious contributions were made to the commentary literature in the following periods of time and an enormous commentary literature was formed. However, in the formation of the hadith commentary literature, the sectarian affiliation of the commentator was one of the most influential factors in determining the content of the commentary. In this context, Imām Māliks study named al-Muwaṭṭaʼ and al-Kutub al-Sitta took the lead in the development of the hadith commentary literature. In particular, al-Imām Māliks al-Muwaṭṭaʼ attracted the attention of the scholars of Andalusia who were interested in the science of hadith, and scholarly trips were made to Medina, one of the eastern Islamic countries, for the education and training of hadith, and as a result of these trips, the people of Andalusia adopted the Mālikī sect. Therefore Imām Māliks study named al-Muwaṭṭaʼ became one of the most important books. In Andalusia, serious commentaries were written on the aforementioned study in almost every century starting from the third century of hijri. One of these commentaries is Abū al-Muṭarrif al-Qanāziʻīs study named Tafsīr al-Muwaṭṭaʼ, which is the subject of our research paper. There is no detached study on this study. For this reason, this study is important in terms of obtaining information about Andalusian hadith commentary. Likewise, it is expected that this study will also be a source of literature for comprehensive studies such as Maliki hadith commentarism and hadith methodology.

 Sunnah is an issue that Muslims pay special attention to it, since it is the second source of the religion of Islam. After the Prophets passing away, both the companions al-saḥāba and the successors tābiʻūn and tabaʻu al-tābiʻūn made extraordinary efforts to understand and interpret the Sunnah correctly. In fact, since the science of hadith is the common denominator in all fields of basic Islamic sciences, all scholars have tried to explain the transmission of hadith, the way it was narrated, whether the narrators were competent to narrate, the explanation of unknown words in the hadith, etc. Although it is possible to find this activity during the Prophets time, it continued in a semi-systematic manner over time, especially after the third century. After the fourth century of hijri, the hadith commentary sharḥ process took on a completely systematic character and the science of hadith commentary became a sub-discipline of the hadith department. The process of writing commentaries, which started in the Islamic world and became a tradition over time, concentrated on the books that established the dominance on Muslim society. In this framework, serious contributions were made to the commentary literature in the following periods of time and an enormous commentary literature was formed. However, in the formation of the hadith commentary literature, the sectarian affiliation of the commentator was one of the most influential factors in determining the content of the commentary. In this context, Imām Māliks study named al-Muwaṭṭaʼ and al-Kutub al-Sitta took the lead in the development of the hadith commentary literature. In particular, al-Imām Māliks al-Muwaṭṭaʼ attracted the attention of the scholars of Andalusia who were interested in the science of hadith, and scholarly trips were made to Medina, one of the eastern Islamic countries, for the education and training of hadith, and as a result of these trips, the people of Andalusia adopted the Mālikī sect. Therefore Imām Māliks study named al-Muwaṭṭaʼ became one of the most important books. In Andalusia, serious commentaries were written on the aforementioned study in almost every century starting from the third century of hijri. One of these commentaries is Abū al-Muṭarrif al-Qanāziʻīs study named Tafsīr al-Muwaṭṭaʼ, which is the subject of our research paper. There is no detached study on this study. For this reason, this study is important in terms of obtaining information about Andalusian hadith commentary. Likewise, it is expected that this study will also be a source of literature for comprehensive studies such as Maliki hadith commentarism and hadith methodology.

 İslam dininin ikinci kaynağı olması hasebiyle sünnet Müslümanların üzerinde hassasiyetle durdukları bir konudur. Hz. Peygamberin ahirete irtihalinden sonra gerek sahabe nesli gerekse tâbiûn ve Tebeut-tâbiîn nesli sünnetin doğru anlamlandırılması ve yorumlanması için olağanüstü gayretler sarf etmişlerdir. Esasen hadis bilim dalı temel İslam bilimlerinin her alanında ortak payda olduğu için bütün ulema hadisin nakli, rivayet ediliş şekli, nakledenlerin rivayete ehil olup olmaması, hadiste geçen bilinmeyen kelimelerin açıklanması vs. durumları izah etmeye çalışmışlardır. Bu faaliyete Hz. Peygamber döneminde de rastlamak mümkün olsa da zamanla özellikle üçüncü asırdan sonra yarı sistematik bir şekilde devam edilmiştir. Hicri dördüncü asırdan sonra ise hadis şerh işlemi tamamen sistematik bir hüviyete bürünmüş ve hadis şerh ilmi, hadis anabilim dalının alt bilim dalı haline gelmiştir. İslam aleminde başlayan ve zamanla bir gelenek haline gelen şerh yazma işlemi Müslüman topluma egemenliğini kuran kitaplar etrafında yoğunlaşmıştır. Bu çerçevede ilerleyen zaman dilimlerinde şerh literatürüne ciddi katkılar sağlanmış ve muazzam bir şerh literatürü oluşmuştur. Ancak hadis şerh literatürünün teşekkülünde şerh eden kişinin mezhep aidiyeti, şerh muhtevalarının belirlenmesinde en etkili olan unsurlardan biri olmuştur. Bu bağlamda hadis şerh literatürünün tekamülünde İmam Mâlikin Muvattâ adlı eseri ile Kütüb-i Sitte başı çekmiştir. Özellikle İmam Mâlikin Muvattâı hadis ilmine aşırı ilgi duyan Endülüs ulemasının da dikkatlerini çekmiştir. Bu çerçevede hadis eğitim ve öğretimi için Doğu İslam ülkelerinden biri olan Medineye ilmî seyahatler düzenlemişlerdir. Bu seyahatler neticesinde Endülüs halkı tarafından Mâlikî mezhebi benimsenmiş, böylece İmam Mâlikin Muvattâ adlı eseri başucu kitabı haline gelmiştir. Endülüste adı geçen eser üzerine hicri III. asırdan başlayarak hemen hemen her asırda ciddi şerhler yazılmıştır. Bu şerhlerden biri de araştırmamıza konu olan Ebul Mutarrif el-Kanâziînin Tefsîrul-Muvattâ adlı eseridir. Eser hakkında yapılan herhangi müstakil bir çalışmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Bu gerekçe ile çalışma Endülüs hadis şerhçiliği hakkında bilgi edinme açısından ehemmiyet arz etmektedir. Keza bu çalışma Mâlikîlerin hadis şerhçiliği ve hadis usulcülüğünü anlamaya yönelik olan daha geniş çalışmalara kaynak telif olacaktır.

Makale detayları

Hadıth Commentary Methodology In The Mālıkīs (Particular To Abū Al-Muṭarrif Al-Qanāziʻī And Hıs Book Tıtled Tafsīr Al-Muwaṭṭaʼ)

Yazarlar:

Uğur Erman

Yayıncı:

Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Van İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 20, pp.74-91

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319561

pISSN:

2667-615X

Hadith

Commentary

al-Imām Mālik

al-Muwaṭṭaʼ

al-QanāziʻīHadis

Şerh

İmam Mâlik

Muvattâ

Kanâziî.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Uğur Erman

Yayıncı: Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar: Hadis

Dergi: Van İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 20, pp.74-91

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001319561

pISSN: 2667-615X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Uğur Erman

Yayıncı:

Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Van İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 20, pp.74-91

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001319561

pISSN:

2667-615X