Case of Objection in Administrative Trial Procedure

Ramazan Çağlayan

Makale detayları

Case of Objection in Administrative Trial Procedure

Yazarlar:

Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

İdare Hukuku

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.381-418

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356097

pISSN:

2149-5831

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Article 2 of the Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 includes two types of lawsuits as cancellation lawsuit and full judicial lawsuit. There are different opinions in the doctrine as to whether there are other types of lawsuits other than these two types of lawsuits in administrative procedure. This discussion comes to the fore especially in the context of declaratory judgement proceedings. Some authors are of the opinion that the types of actions in administrative procedure are limited to cancellation actions and full remedy actions. Some authors, on the other hand, are of the opinion that these two lawsuits are the basic lawsuits, that they are the lawsuits that must be included in the administrative judiciary, that the lawsuits in the administrative judiciary are not limited to these, that there may be other lawsuits, and that in this context, the declaratory action may also be accepted. We agree with this second view. There are provisions in the laws stipulating that some administrative actions, especially administrative sanctions, may be objection to administrative courts. Special procedural rules are envisaged for this remedy, such as a special application period, examination of documents, and the closure of legal remedies. This raises the question of whether there is a separate type of case. The subject is discussed both in the doctrine and in court decisions. In this study, it will be analysed whether this remedy is a separate type of action. In addition to how the issue is handled in court decisions, it will be subject to an evaluation in terms of legislation.

 Article 2 of the Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 includes two types of lawsuits as cancellation lawsuit and full judicial lawsuit. There are different opinions in the doctrine as to whether there are other types of lawsuits other than these two types of lawsuits in administrative procedure. This discussion comes to the fore especially in the context of declaratory judgement proceedings. Some authors are of the opinion that the types of actions in administrative procedure are limited to cancellation actions and full remedy actions. Some authors, on the other hand, are of the opinion that these two lawsuits are the basic lawsuits, that they are the lawsuits that must be included in the administrative judiciary, that the lawsuits in the administrative judiciary are not limited to these, that there may be other lawsuits, and that in this context, the declaratory action may also be accepted. We agree with this second view. There are provisions in the laws stipulating that some administrative actions, especially administrative sanctions, may be objection to administrative courts. Special procedural rules are envisaged for this remedy, such as a special application period, examination of documents, and the closure of legal remedies. This raises the question of whether there is a separate type of case. The subject is discussed both in the doctrine and in court decisions. In this study, it will be analysed whether this remedy is a separate type of action. In addition to how the issue is handled in court decisions, it will be subject to an evaluation in terms of legislation.

 Article 2 of the Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 includes two types of lawsuits as cancellation lawsuit and full judicial lawsuit. There are different opinions in the doctrine as to whether there are other types of lawsuits other than these two types of lawsuits in administrative procedure. This discussion comes to the fore especially in the context of declaratory judgement proceedings. Some authors are of the opinion that the types of actions in administrative procedure are limited to cancellation actions and full remedy actions. Some authors, on the other hand, are of the opinion that these two lawsuits are the basic lawsuits, that they are the lawsuits that must be included in the administrative judiciary, that the lawsuits in the administrative judiciary are not limited to these, that there may be other lawsuits, and that in this context, the declaratory action may also be accepted. We agree with this second view. There are provisions in the laws stipulating that some administrative actions, especially administrative sanctions, may be objection to administrative courts. Special procedural rules are envisaged for this remedy, such as a special application period, examination of documents, and the closure of legal remedies. This raises the question of whether there is a separate type of case. The subject is discussed both in the doctrine and in court decisions. In this study, it will be analysed whether this remedy is a separate type of action. In addition to how the issue is handled in court decisions, it will be subject to an evaluation in terms of legislation.

 2577 sayılı İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunun 2.maddesinde iptal davası ve tam yargı davası şeklinde iki tür dava yer almaktadır. İdari yargılama usulünde bu iki dava dışında dava türü olup olmadığı konusunda öğretide farklı görüşler bulunmaktadır. Bu tartışma özellikle tespit davası bağlamında gündeme gelmektedir. Bazı yazarlar, idari yargılama usulünde dava türlerinin iptal davası ve tam yargı davası ile sınırlı olduğu görüşündedir. Kimi yazarlar ise, bu iki davanın temel davalar olduğu, idari yargıda mutlaka olması gereken davalar olduğu, idari yargıda davaların bunlar ile sınırlı olmadığı, başka davalar da olabileceği, bu bağlamda tespit davasının da kabul edilebileceği görüşündedir. Biz de bu ikinci görüşe iştirak ediyoruz. Kanunlarda, bazı idarî işlemler özellikle idarî yaptırımlara karşı idare mahkemelerine itiraz edilebileceği yönünde düzenlemeler bulunmaktadır. Bu başvuru yolu için, özel başvuru süresi, evrak üzerinden inceleme, kanun yollarının kapalı olması gibi özel usûl kuralları öngörülmektedir. Bu durum, ayrı bir dava türü olup olmadığını gündeme getirmektedir. Konu hem öğretide hem de mahkeme kararlarında tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, söz konusu başvuru yolunun ayrı bir dava türü olup olmadığı ele alınacaktır. Mahkeme kararlarında konunun nasıl ele alındığı yanında, mevzuat bakımından bir değerlendirmeye tabi tutulacaktır.

Makale detayları

Case of Objection in Administrative Trial Procedure

Yazarlar:

Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

İdare Hukuku

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.381-418

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356097

pISSN:

2149-5831

Administrative jurisdiction

types of lawsuits

annulment lawsuit

objection

finality.İdari yargı

dava türleri

iptal davası

itiraz yolu

kesinlik.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı: Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar: İdare Hukuku

Dergi: Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.381-418

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001356097

pISSN: 2149-5831

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ramazan Çağlayan

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

İdare Hukuku

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.381-418

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356097

pISSN:

2149-5831