A Study On The Similarity Of Aristotle's Perception Of History With Ibn Khaldūn's Philosophy Of History

Murat Serdar; Sami Okan Köse

Makale detayları

A Study On The Similarity Of Aristotle's Perception Of History With Ibn Khaldūn's Philosophy Of History

Yazarlar:

Murat Serdar | Sami Okan Köse

Yayıncı:

Manisa Celal Bayar University

Ana Başlıklar:

Eskiçağ Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi:

Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.22 Issue 3, pp.1-16

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001328646

pISSN:

1304-4796

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Philosophy of history, in its simplest definition, is the understanding of history with a philosophical mind, a kind of philosophizing or philosophizing. It is generally accepted that Voltaire was the first to articulate philosophy of history as a name and Vico was the first to institutionalize it as a discipline. Although this is generally accepted, in fact, long before these two names, first Aristotle and then Ibn Khaldūn, with various methods and discourses, put forward an approach that history could only gain value and meaning by taking on a philosophical nature. Thus, they contributed to the formation of the first nuclei of the philosophy of history. This study, which aims to compare Aristotles and Ibn Khaldūns conceptions of history or philosophies of history, reveals that both Aristotle and Ibn Khaldūn, apart from some simple nuances between them, agree on the idea that history can only be valuable by assuming a philosophical character.

 Philosophy of history, in its simplest definition, is the understanding of history with a philosophical mind, a kind of philosophizing or philosophizing. It is generally accepted that Voltaire was the first to articulate philosophy of history as a name and Vico was the first to institutionalize it as a discipline. Although this is generally accepted, in fact, long before these two names, first Aristotle and then Ibn Khaldūn, with various methods and discourses, put forward an approach that history could only gain value and meaning by taking on a philosophical nature. Thus, they contributed to the formation of the first nuclei of the philosophy of history. This study, which aims to compare Aristotles and Ibn Khaldūns conceptions of history or philosophies of history, reveals that both Aristotle and Ibn Khaldūn, apart from some simple nuances between them, agree on the idea that history can only be valuable by assuming a philosophical character.

 Philosophy of history, in its simplest definition, is the understanding of history with a philosophical mind, a kind of philosophizing or philosophizing. It is generally accepted that Voltaire was the first to articulate philosophy of history as a name and Vico was the first to institutionalize it as a discipline. Although this is generally accepted, in fact, long before these two names, first Aristotle and then Ibn Khaldūn, with various methods and discourses, put forward an approach that history could only gain value and meaning by taking on a philosophical nature. Thus, they contributed to the formation of the first nuclei of the philosophy of history. This study, which aims to compare Aristotles and Ibn Khaldūns conceptions of history or philosophies of history, reveals that both Aristotle and Ibn Khaldūn, apart from some simple nuances between them, agree on the idea that history can only be valuable by assuming a philosophical character.

 Tarih felsefesi en basit tanımıyla tarihin felsefi bir zihinle telakkisi, bir nevi felsefileştirilmesi veya felsefileştirilmiş halidir. Genel kabul, tarih felsefesini isim olarak ilk dillendirenin Voltaire ve kurumsal manada bir disiplin haline sokan kişinin de Vico olduğu üzerinedir. Her ne kadar genel kabul bu yönde olsa da aslında bu iki isimden çok daha önce ilk olarak Aristoteles ve sonrasında da İbn Haldûn, çeşitli yöntem ve söylemlerle tarihin ancak felsefi bir mahiyete bürünmek suretiyle değer ve anlam kazanacağı minvalinde bir yaklaşım ortaya koymuştur. Böylelikle de tarih felsefesinin ilk nüvelerinin oluşturulmasına katkıda bulunmuşlardır. Aristoteles ve İbn Haldûnun tarih anlayışlarını veya tarih felsefelerini karşılaştırmayı amaç edinen bu çalışma; hem Aristotelesin hem de İbn Haldûnun aralarındaki birtakım basit nüansların sayılmaması halinde, tarihin, sadece felsefi bir karaktere sahip olmakla kıymetli olabileceği düşüncesinde hemfikir olduklarını ortaya koymaktadır.

Makale detayları

A Study On The Similarity Of Aristotle's Perception Of History With Ibn Khaldūn's Philosophy Of History

Yazarlar:

Murat Serdar | Sami Okan Köse

Yayıncı:

Manisa Celal Bayar University

Ana Başlıklar:

Eskiçağ Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi:

Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.22 Issue 3, pp.1-16

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001328646

pISSN:

1304-4796

Aristototle

Ibn Khaldūn

History

PhilosophyAristoteles

İbn Haldûn

Tarih

Felsefe

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Murat Serdar | Sami Okan Köse

Yayıncı: Manisa Celal Bayar University

Ana Başlıklar: Eskiçağ Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.22 Issue 3, pp.1-16

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001328646

pISSN: 1304-4796

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Murat Serdar | Sami Okan Köse

Yayıncı:

Manisa Celal Bayar University

Ana Başlıklar:

Eskiçağ Tarihi (Diğer)

Dergi:

Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.22 Issue 3, pp.1-16

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001328646

pISSN:

1304-4796