Evaluation of the Quality, Reliability and Usability of YouTube About ‘Guided Tissue Regeneration’

Esra Bozkurt; Eda Çetin Özdemir

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Quality, Reliability and Usability of YouTube About ‘Guided Tissue Regeneration’

Yazarlar:

Esra Bozkurt | Eda Çetin Özdemir

Yayıncı:

Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar:

Periodontoloji

Dergi:

Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.11-23

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001347330

pISSN:

2980-0013

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability and usability in student education of videos on YouTube about Guided Tissue Regeneration GTR. Materials and Methods: The YouTube platform was searched on 22 July 2024 using the term GTR. The first 500 videos were initially evaluated, and 131 videos were included in the study. For all videos, the duration of the video, total number of views, number of likes and dislikes, the number of streams to date since the time of upload, the source of uploads, and the subject of the video were recorded. The viewer interaction index, video power index, and view rate were calculated. The Global Quality Scale GQS was used to evaluate the quality of the videos, and the Modified DISCERN tool and Usefulness Scores were analyzed to evaluate reliability. Results: Statistically significant, positive relationships were found between the number of views, number of likes, number of followers, video duration, and GQS. Significant, positive relationships were found between DISCERN and Usefulness Scores and video duration. No statistically significant relationships were found between the video upload source and the GQS, Usefulness and DISCERN scores. Conclusion: It was observed that videos about GTR on YouTube are not of sufficient quality and reliability for the education of dentistry students or for patient information. Students and patients should be made aware that not all information they obtain from online video sources is completely accurate.

 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability and usability in student education of videos on YouTube about Guided Tissue Regeneration GTR. Materials and Methods: The YouTube platform was searched on 22 July 2024 using the term GTR. The first 500 videos were initially evaluated, and 131 videos were included in the study. For all videos, the duration of the video, total number of views, number of likes and dislikes, the number of streams to date since the time of upload, the source of uploads, and the subject of the video were recorded. The viewer interaction index, video power index, and view rate were calculated. The Global Quality Scale GQS was used to evaluate the quality of the videos, and the Modified DISCERN tool and Usefulness Scores were analyzed to evaluate reliability. Results: Statistically significant, positive relationships were found between the number of views, number of likes, number of followers, video duration, and GQS. Significant, positive relationships were found between DISCERN and Usefulness Scores and video duration. No statistically significant relationships were found between the video upload source and the GQS, Usefulness and DISCERN scores. Conclusion: It was observed that videos about GTR on YouTube are not of sufficient quality and reliability for the education of dentistry students or for patient information. Students and patients should be made aware that not all information they obtain from online video sources is completely accurate.

 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability and usability in student education of videos on YouTube about Guided Tissue Regeneration GTR. Materials and Methods: The YouTube platform was searched on 22 July 2024 using the term GTR. The first 500 videos were initially evaluated, and 131 videos were included in the study. For all videos, the duration of the video, total number of views, number of likes and dislikes, the number of streams to date since the time of upload, the source of uploads, and the subject of the video were recorded. The viewer interaction index, video power index, and view rate were calculated. The Global Quality Scale GQS was used to evaluate the quality of the videos, and the Modified DISCERN tool and Usefulness Scores were analyzed to evaluate reliability. Results: Statistically significant, positive relationships were found between the number of views, number of likes, number of followers, video duration, and GQS. Significant, positive relationships were found between DISCERN and Usefulness Scores and video duration. No statistically significant relationships were found between the video upload source and the GQS, Usefulness and DISCERN scores. Conclusion: It was observed that videos about GTR on YouTube are not of sufficient quality and reliability for the education of dentistry students or for patient information. Students and patients should be made aware that not all information they obtain from online video sources is completely accurate.

 Amaç: Çalışmamızda YouTube deki Yönlendirilmiş Doku Rejenerasyonu ile ilgili videoların kalitesini, güvenilirliğini ve öğrenci eğitiminde kullanılabilirliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda 22 Temmuz 2024 te Yönlendirilmiş Doku Rejenarasyonu arama terimi kullanılarak YouTubeda bir arama yapıldı. İlk 500 video ön değerlendirmeye alındı ve 131 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm videolar için videonun süresi, toplam görüntüleme sayısı, beğeni ve beğenmeme sayısı, yükleme zamanında bugüne kadar geçen sürü, yükleme kaynağı ve videonun konusu kaydedildi. İzleyici etkileşim endeksi, video güç indeksi ve görüntüleme oranı hesaplandı. Videoların kalitesi değerlendirmek için Küresel Kalite Ölçeği GQS, güvenilirliğini değerlendirmek için Değiştirilmiş DISCERN aracı ve Faydalılık Puanları analiz edildi. Bulgular: Görüntülenme sayısı, beğeni sayısı, takipçi sayısı, video süresi, ile GQS arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı, pozitif yönlü ilişkiler bulunmuştur. DISCERN ve Yararlılık Puanı ile video süresi arasında olarak anlamlı, pozitif yönlü ilişkiler görüldü. Video yükleme kaynağı ile GQS, Usefulness ve DISCERN Scorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkiler elde edilmemiştir. Sonuç: YouTube daki YDR videolarının içeriğinin diş hekimliği öğrencilerinin eğitimi ve hasta bilgilendirilmesi için yeterli kalite ve güvenilirliğe sahip olmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Öğrencilere ve hastalara çevrimiçi video kaynaklarından elde ettikleri tüm bilgilerin tamamen doğru olmadığı konusunda farkındalık kazandırılmalıdır.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Quality, Reliability and Usability of YouTube About ‘Guided Tissue Regeneration’

Yazarlar:

Esra Bozkurt | Eda Çetin Özdemir

Yayıncı:

Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar:

Periodontoloji

Dergi:

Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.11-23

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001347330

pISSN:

2980-0013

DISCERN

GQS

Guided Tissue Regeneration

Usefulness Score

YouTubeYönlendirmiş Doku Rejenerasyonu

GQS

DISCERN

Yararlılık Puanı

Youtube

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Esra Bozkurt | Eda Çetin Özdemir

Yayıncı: Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar: Periodontoloji

Dergi: Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.11-23

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2025

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001347330

pISSN: 2980-0013

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Esra Bozkurt | Eda Çetin Özdemir

Yayıncı:

Akdeniz University

Ana Başlıklar:

Periodontoloji

Dergi:

Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.11-23

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001347330

pISSN:

2980-0013