Evaluation of  ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ al-Qāḍī’s Work Named Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Rīwāyat al-Qālūn in terms of the Science of Qirā’a

Mustafa Aksoy

Makale detayları

Evaluation of ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ al-Qāḍī’s Work Named Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Rīwāyat al-Qālūn in terms of the Science of Qirā’a

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Aksoy

Yayıncı:

Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

İlahiyat Akademi Issue 21, pp.93-126

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001353039

pISSN:

2149-3979

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The greatest duty that the science of qirāa has undoubtedly undertaken and meticulously fulfilled is to ensure that the words and pronunciations of the Holy Qurān, which is a divine revelation, have been preserved until today by distinguishing the authentic recitations from the inauthentic ones. From the revelation of the Qurān to the present, thousands of great personalities have devoted their lives to the science of the Qurān and qirāa throughout history and have left countless works in this field as a legacy for future generations. One of the scholars in our recent history who engaged in this science throughout his life and wrote many important works in this field is Abd al-Fattāḥ al- Qāḍī from Egypt. His works are important sources of knowledge on different areas of the science of qirāa, written both in verse and prose. The fact that he was Egyptian and that the Shātibiyya Tarīq was the most prevalent recitation school in Egypt played an important role in determining the framework of the works he wrote. The common feature seen in Qāḍīs works is that they are a response to the needs of the period in which they were written, rather than simply repeating old classical qirāa and tajwīd works. Since the recitation of the Holy Qurān was mostly performed with the Warsh narration, especially among the qāris in Egypt, during his time, and probably because the Warsh narration was more famous than the Qālūn narration, the author first composed the conflicting parts between the two narrations and then made annotations on the poetry for the benefit of those who are interested in it, for the ease of use. This study analyzes and criticizes one of Qāḍīs works, Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Rīwāyat al-Qālūn, which he wrote about the places where the narrators of the narrations of Qālūn and Versh, the narrators of the Nāfi qirāa, disagreed in terms of the science of qirāa. The original of this commentary is a poem of 40 couplets titled al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Riwāyat al-Qālūn. In this article, the authors mastety of the qirāa and narrations, his succinct and comprehensible presentation of the issues, the method he followed in the commentary, and whether he remained faithful to this method from the beginning to the end of the commentary are discussed and analyzed. In addition, attention is drawn to what the issues in the work are and how they are handled, and the importance of revealing the differences between two narrations in one qirāa. In addition, some of the issues mentioned in the work are criticized both for their incompatibility with the title of the work and for the way they are handled and explained. In the conclusion, the authors comments on the method he followed in the commentary and criticisms for deviating from the method he followed in some issues are included. The examination and study of this work aims to present Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn to the benefit of the aspirants of the science of qirāa by integrating it into todays studies. In addition, it aims to reveal how solid and strong Abd al-Fattāḥ al- Qāḍīs connection with this science is as a scholar of qirāa, to witness his proficiency and depth in the science of qirāa, and to introduce such an important scholar of qirāa to todays qirāa students.

 The greatest duty that the science of qirāa has undoubtedly undertaken and meticulously fulfilled is to ensure that the words and pronunciations of the Holy Qurān, which is a divine revelation, have been preserved until today by distinguishing the authentic recitations from the inauthentic ones. From the revelation of the Qurān to the present, thousands of great personalities have devoted their lives to the science of the Qurān and qirāa throughout history and have left countless works in this field as a legacy for future generations. One of the scholars in our recent history who engaged in this science throughout his life and wrote many important works in this field is Abd al-Fattāḥ al- Qāḍī from Egypt. His works are important sources of knowledge on different areas of the science of qirāa, written both in verse and prose. The fact that he was Egyptian and that the Shātibiyya Tarīq was the most prevalent recitation school in Egypt played an important role in determining the framework of the works he wrote. The common feature seen in Qāḍīs works is that they are a response to the needs of the period in which they were written, rather than simply repeating old classical qirāa and tajwīd works. Since the recitation of the Holy Qurān was mostly performed with the Warsh narration, especially among the qāris in Egypt, during his time, and probably because the Warsh narration was more famous than the Qālūn narration, the author first composed the conflicting parts between the two narrations and then made annotations on the poetry for the benefit of those who are interested in it, for the ease of use. This study analyzes and criticizes one of Qāḍīs works, Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Rīwāyat al-Qālūn, which he wrote about the places where the narrators of the narrations of Qālūn and Versh, the narrators of the Nāfi qirāa, disagreed in terms of the science of qirāa. The original of this commentary is a poem of 40 couplets titled al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Riwāyat al-Qālūn. In this article, the authors mastety of the qirāa and narrations, his succinct and comprehensible presentation of the issues, the method he followed in the commentary, and whether he remained faithful to this method from the beginning to the end of the commentary are discussed and analyzed. In addition, attention is drawn to what the issues in the work are and how they are handled, and the importance of revealing the differences between two narrations in one qirāa. In addition, some of the issues mentioned in the work are criticized both for their incompatibility with the title of the work and for the way they are handled and explained. In the conclusion, the authors comments on the method he followed in the commentary and criticisms for deviating from the method he followed in some issues are included. The examination and study of this work aims to present Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn to the benefit of the aspirants of the science of qirāa by integrating it into todays studies. In addition, it aims to reveal how solid and strong Abd al-Fattāḥ al- Qāḍīs connection with this science is as a scholar of qirāa, to witness his proficiency and depth in the science of qirāa, and to introduce such an important scholar of qirāa to todays qirāa students.

 The greatest duty that the science of qirāa has undoubtedly undertaken and meticulously fulfilled is to ensure that the words and pronunciations of the Holy Qurān, which is a divine revelation, have been preserved until today by distinguishing the authentic recitations from the inauthentic ones. From the revelation of the Qurān to the present, thousands of great personalities have devoted their lives to the science of the Qurān and qirāa throughout history and have left countless works in this field as a legacy for future generations. One of the scholars in our recent history who engaged in this science throughout his life and wrote many important works in this field is Abd al-Fattāḥ al- Qāḍī from Egypt. His works are important sources of knowledge on different areas of the science of qirāa, written both in verse and prose. The fact that he was Egyptian and that the Shātibiyya Tarīq was the most prevalent recitation school in Egypt played an important role in determining the framework of the works he wrote. The common feature seen in Qāḍīs works is that they are a response to the needs of the period in which they were written, rather than simply repeating old classical qirāa and tajwīd works. Since the recitation of the Holy Qurān was mostly performed with the Warsh narration, especially among the qāris in Egypt, during his time, and probably because the Warsh narration was more famous than the Qālūn narration, the author first composed the conflicting parts between the two narrations and then made annotations on the poetry for the benefit of those who are interested in it, for the ease of use. This study analyzes and criticizes one of Qāḍīs works, Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Rīwāyat al-Qālūn, which he wrote about the places where the narrators of the narrations of Qālūn and Versh, the narrators of the Nāfi qirāa, disagreed in terms of the science of qirāa. The original of this commentary is a poem of 40 couplets titled al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Riwāyat al-Qālūn. In this article, the authors mastety of the qirāa and narrations, his succinct and comprehensible presentation of the issues, the method he followed in the commentary, and whether he remained faithful to this method from the beginning to the end of the commentary are discussed and analyzed. In addition, attention is drawn to what the issues in the work are and how they are handled, and the importance of revealing the differences between two narrations in one qirāa. In addition, some of the issues mentioned in the work are criticized both for their incompatibility with the title of the work and for the way they are handled and explained. In the conclusion, the authors comments on the method he followed in the commentary and criticisms for deviating from the method he followed in some issues are included. The examination and study of this work aims to present Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn to the benefit of the aspirants of the science of qirāa by integrating it into todays studies. In addition, it aims to reveal how solid and strong Abd al-Fattāḥ al- Qāḍīs connection with this science is as a scholar of qirāa, to witness his proficiency and depth in the science of qirāa, and to introduce such an important scholar of qirāa to todays qirāa students.

 Kıraat ilminin hiç şüphesiz üstlenmiş olduğu ve titizlikle yerine getirdiği en büyük görev, sahih kıraatleri sahih olmayan kıraatlerden ayırarak ilahi vahiy olan Kurân-ı Kerîmin kelime ve telaffuzlarının günümüze kadar korunarak gelmesini sağlamaktır. Kurânın nüzulundan günümüze tarihin her döneminde bu amaca matuf binlerce büyük şahsiyet hayatını Kurân-ı Kerîm ve kıraat ilmine feda etmiş ve kendisinden sonraki gelecek nesillere miras olarak bu alanda sayısız eserler bırakmışlardır. Yakın tarihimizde hayatı boyunca bu ilimle iştigal eden ve alana dair birçok önemli eser kaleme alan âlimlerden biri de Mısırlı Abdulfettâh el-Kâdîdir. Eserleri kıraat ilminin farklı alanlarına dair kaynak niteliğinde hem nazım hem mensur olarak kaleme alınmış önemli eserlerdir. Kendisinin Mısırlı olması ve Mısırda kıraat tedrisinde öncelikle ve daha çok Şâtıbiyye Tarîkinin yaygın olması, kaleme almış olduğu eserlerin çerçevesini belirlemede önemli rol oynamıştır. Kâdînin eserlerinde gözüken genel ortak özellik, eski klasik kıraat ve tecvit eserlerinin tekrar edilmesinden öte; yazıldığı dönemin ihtiyaçlarına cevap niteliğinde olmasıdır. Müellif, kendi yaşadığı dönemde özellikle Mısırda kârîler arasında Kurân-ı Kerîm tilavetinin daha çok Verş rivayetiyle icra edilmesi ve muhtemelen Verş rivayetinin, Kâlûn rivayetinden daha meşhur olmasından dolayı her iki rivayet arasındaki ihtilaf edilen yerleri önce nazmederek daha sonra da istifadenin kolaylığı açısından manzumesini şerh ederek ilgililerin istifadesine sunmuştur. Bizim bu çalışmamız Kâdînin eserlerinden biri olan Şerhus-Sirrul-masûn fî rivâyeti Kâlûn ismini verdiği Nâfi kıraatinin râvîleri olan Kâlûn ve Verş rivayetlerinin ihtilaf ettikleri yerlere dair yazdığı eserini kıraat ilmi açısından tahlil ve tenkide tabi tutmaktadır. Bu şerhin aslı ise 40 beyitten oluşan es-Sirrul-masûn fî rivâyeti Kâlûn adlı manzumedir. Makalede müellifin kıraat ve rivayet vecihlerine vukufiyeti, meseleleri veciz ve anlaşılır bir şekilde beyanı, şerhte izlemiş olduğu metot ve şerhin başından sonuna bu metoda sadık kalıp kalmadığı ele alınıp incelenmektedir. Ayrıca eserde yer alan mevzuların neler olduğuna ve nasıl ele alındığına; bir kıraatteki iki rivayet arasındaki farklılıkların ortaya konmasının önemine dikkat çekilmektedir. Bununla beraber eserde zikredilen bazı mevzular gerek eserin ismiyle bağdaşmamasından gerekse ele alınış şekilleri ve açıklamaları açısından tenkit edilmiştir. Sonuç kısmında, müellifin şerhte takip etmiş olduğu metoda dair mülahazalar ve bazı konularda izlemiş olduğu metottan ayrıldığı için tenkitlere yer verilmiştir. Bu eserin incelenmesi ve çalışılması Şerhus-Sirrul-masûn adlı eserini günümüz çalışmalarına kazandırarak kıraat ilmi taliplerinin istifadelerine sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Ayrıca bir kıraat âlimi olarak Abdulfettâh el-Kâdînin bu ilimle olan irtibatının ne denli sağlam ve kuvvetli olduğunu ortaya koymak, onun kıraat ilmine olan vukûfiyeti ve derinliğine şahit olmak ve böylesi önemli bir kıraat âlimini günümüz kıraat talipleriyle tanıştırmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ al-Qāḍī’s Work Named Sharḥ al-Sirr al-Maṣūn fī Rīwāyat al-Qālūn in terms of the Science of Qirā’a

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Aksoy

Yayıncı:

Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

İlahiyat Akademi Issue 21, pp.93-126

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001353039

pISSN:

2149-3979

Qirā’a

Nāfi‘ Qirā’a

Qālūn

Warsh

ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ al-Qāḍī

Poetry

Commentary

Sharḥ al-Sirr al-MaṣūnKıraat

Nâfi‘ kıraati

Kâlûn

Verş

Abdulfettah el-Kâdî

Manzume

Şerh

Şerhu’s-Sirru’l-masûn

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Mustafa Aksoy

Yayıncı: Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar: Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi: İlahiyat Akademi Issue 21, pp.93-126

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001353039

pISSN: 2149-3979

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Mustafa Aksoy

Yayıncı:

Gaziantep University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

İlahiyat Akademi Issue 21, pp.93-126

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001353039

pISSN:

2149-3979