ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES OF FACULTIES WITH TOPSIS METHOD, A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS

Zafer Yıldırım; F. Müge Sakar

Makale detayları

ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES OF FACULTIES WITH TOPSIS METHOD, A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS

Yazarlar:

Zafer Yıldırım | F. Müge Sakar

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ekonomi

Dergi:

Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 25, pp.98-116

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290371

pISSN:

1309-4602

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this study, the academic incentive system, which also determines the academic performance levels, has been examined in general and it has been tried to determine what the improvement aspects are. In the performance analysis made in terms of academic incentives, the data of the faculties operating at Dicle University for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021 were analyzed separately in three terms. Predetermined criteria for performance analysis were weighted with the ENTROPI method and then the faculties were evaluated in three terms with the TOPSIS method, which is one of the multi-criteria decision making methods. As a result of the analysis, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second, and Faculty of Law third for 2019. For the year 2020, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second and Faculty of Agriculture third. Finally, for the year 2021, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second and Faculty of Science third.

 In this study, the academic incentive system, which also determines the academic performance levels, has been examined in general and it has been tried to determine what the improvement aspects are. In the performance analysis made in terms of academic incentives, the data of the faculties operating at Dicle University for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021 were analyzed separately in three terms. Predetermined criteria for performance analysis were weighted with the ENTROPI method and then the faculties were evaluated in three terms with the TOPSIS method, which is one of the multi-criteria decision making methods. As a result of the analysis, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second, and Faculty of Law third for 2019. For the year 2020, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second and Faculty of Agriculture third. Finally, for the year 2021, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second and Faculty of Science third.

 In this study, the academic incentive system, which also determines the academic performance levels, has been examined in general and it has been tried to determine what the improvement aspects are. In the performance analysis made in terms of academic incentives, the data of the faculties operating at Dicle University for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021 were analyzed separately in three terms. Predetermined criteria for performance analysis were weighted with the ENTROPI method and then the faculties were evaluated in three terms with the TOPSIS method, which is one of the multi-criteria decision making methods. As a result of the analysis, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second, and Faculty of Law third for 2019. For the year 2020, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second and Faculty of Agriculture third. Finally, for the year 2021, Faculty of Medicine ranked first, Faculty of Education second and Faculty of Science third.

 Bu çalışmada akademik performans seviyelerini de belirleyen akademik teşvik sistemi genel olarak incelenmiş ve buna yönelik geliştirici yönlerin neler olduğu tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Akademik teşvik açısından yapılan performans analizinde Dicle Üniversitesinde faaliyette bulunan fakültelere ait 2019, 2020 ve 2021 yıllarına ait veriler üç dönem halinde ayrı ayrı analiz edilmiştir. Performans analizi için önceden belirlenmiş kriterler ENTROPI yöntemi ile ağırlıklandırılmış ve daha sonra çok kriterli karar verme metotlarından olan TOPSIS yöntemi ile fakülteler üç dönem içinde değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda 2019 yılı için Tıp Fakültesi birinci, Eğitim Fakültesi ikinci ve Hukuk Fakültesi üçüncü olmuştur. 2020 yılı için Tıp Fakültesi birinci, Eğitim Fakültesi ikinci ve Ziraat Fakültesi üçüncü olmuştur. Son olarak 2021 yılı için Tıp Fakültesi birinci, Eğitim Fakültesi ikinci ve Fen Fakültesi üçüncü olmuştur.

Makale detayları

ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES OF FACULTIES WITH TOPSIS METHOD, A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS

Yazarlar:

Zafer Yıldırım | F. Müge Sakar

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ekonomi

Dergi:

Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 25, pp.98-116

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290371

pISSN:

1309-4602

Academic Incentive

Academic Performance

Multi-Criteria Decision Making

TOPSIS

ENTROPIAkademik Teşvik

Akademik Performans

Çok Kriterli Karar Verme

TOPSIS

ENTROPI

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Zafer Yıldırım | F. Müge Sakar

Yayıncı: Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar: Ekonomi

Dergi: Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 25, pp.98-116

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 5/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001290371

pISSN: 1309-4602

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Zafer Yıldırım | F. Müge Sakar

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ekonomi

Dergi:

Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 25, pp.98-116

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

5/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290371

pISSN:

1309-4602