An analysis of the European Court’s Approach to Extraterritorial Application in the light of the European Court’s Admissibility Decision in Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia

Ceren Karagözoğlu

Makale detayları

An analysis of the European Court’s Approach to Extraterritorial Application in the light of the European Court’s Admissibility Decision in Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia

Yazarlar:

Ceren Karagözoğlu

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.633-652

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001287932

pISSN:

2147-768X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In European Convention on Human Rights the concept of jurisdiction is laid down in connection with the obligations arising from the treaties for states, which is different from its international law counterpart. In the Convention system, it is observed that the State is obliged to fulfill its obligations arising from human rights treaties to the extent that it provides authority and control. The bodies of the Convetion use the factual relationship established through two criteria, that the respondent State exercised effective control over an area is beyond its territority or the victims fell under State agent authority and control in territory which is beyond States territory, to determine the extraterritorial application of the Convention. In the admissibility decision of Ukraine and NetherlandsRussia by the European Court of Human Rights in 2022, the Court evaluated the concept of extraterritorial application of the ECHR, the relationship between jurisdiction and attribution, and the application of the treaty during international armed conflicts. This study will examine the approach to extraterritorial application within the framework of this decision.

 In European Convention on Human Rights the concept of jurisdiction is laid down in connection with the obligations arising from the treaties for states, which is different from its international law counterpart. In the Convention system, it is observed that the State is obliged to fulfill its obligations arising from human rights treaties to the extent that it provides authority and control. The bodies of the Convetion use the factual relationship established through two criteria, that the respondent State exercised effective control over an area is beyond its territority or the victims fell under State agent authority and control in territory which is beyond States territory, to determine the extraterritorial application of the Convention. In the admissibility decision of Ukraine and NetherlandsRussia by the European Court of Human Rights in 2022, the Court evaluated the concept of extraterritorial application of the ECHR, the relationship between jurisdiction and attribution, and the application of the treaty during international armed conflicts. This study will examine the approach to extraterritorial application within the framework of this decision.

 In European Convention on Human Rights the concept of jurisdiction is laid down in connection with the obligations arising from the treaties for states, which is different from its international law counterpart. In the Convention system, it is observed that the State is obliged to fulfill its obligations arising from human rights treaties to the extent that it provides authority and control. The bodies of the Convetion use the factual relationship established through two criteria, that the respondent State exercised effective control over an area is beyond its territority or the victims fell under State agent authority and control in territory which is beyond States territory, to determine the extraterritorial application of the Convention. In the admissibility decision of Ukraine and NetherlandsRussia by the European Court of Human Rights in 2022, the Court evaluated the concept of extraterritorial application of the ECHR, the relationship between jurisdiction and attribution, and the application of the treaty during international armed conflicts. This study will examine the approach to extraterritorial application within the framework of this decision.

 Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinde yetki, uluslararası hukuktaki karşılığından farklı olarak, taraf devletlerin sözleşmelerden doğan yükümlülükleriyle ilişkilendirilmektedir. Sözleşmenin ülke dışına uygulanması çerçevesinde devletin yetkisinin tespiti, taraf devletin belirli bir bölge veya birey üzerinde yasama, yürütme veya yargı yetkisi kullanmasından yahut bu yetkilerini kullanmasına ilişkin sınırların belirlenmesinden ziyade; devletin, belirli bir bölge veya hak sahibi birey üzerinde denetim ve otorite uygulaması üzerine kurulmaktadır. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesinin 2022 tarihli Ukrayna ve HollandaRusya kabul edilebilirlik kararı ise Sözleşmenin ülke dışına uygulanabilirliği çerçevesinde yetki kavramına, yetki ve atfedilme kavramları arasındaki ilişkiye ve Sözleşmenin uluslararası nitelikli silahlı çatışmalar sırasında uygulanmasına ilişkin değerlendirme içermesi bakımından önemli bir kararı teşkil etmektedir. Çalışmada ise söz konusu karar çerçevesinde Mahkemenin yetki yaklaşımı incelenecektir.

Makale detayları

An analysis of the European Court’s Approach to Extraterritorial Application in the light of the European Court’s Admissibility Decision in Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia

Yazarlar:

Ceren Karagözoğlu

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.633-652

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001287932

pISSN:

2147-768X

European Convention on Human Rights

Jurisdiction

Extraterritorial Application

Attribution

Armed ConflictAvrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi

Yetki

Ülke dışı Uygulama

Atfedilme

Silahlı Çatışmalar

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ceren Karagözoğlu

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.633-652

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 8/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001287932

pISSN: 2147-768X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ceren Karagözoğlu

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.633-652

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

8/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001287932

pISSN:

2147-768X