IMPACT OF LEGAL AMENDMENTS ON INTELLECTUAL AND ARTISTIC WORKS HOLDERS: KEMAL SUNAL CASE

Elif Beyza Akkanat Öztürk; Orhan Gazi Sarıdağ

Makale detayları

IMPACT OF LEGAL AMENDMENTS ON INTELLECTUAL AND ARTISTIC WORKS HOLDERS: KEMAL SUNAL CASE

Yazarlar:

Elif Beyza Akkanat Öztürk | Orhan Gazi Sarıdağ

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.139-148

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001323210

pISSN:

2149-4576

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The subject of this study is the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation of 01.12.2022 decision. This decision, also known as the Kemal Sunal decision, is a decision that has been followed by the media and its results have found a place in the press. In our opinion, the decision is also worth analysing to show the impact of technological development and the diversification and change in the form of broadcasting activities on the field of intellectual property rights. In this context, this study, after identifying the legal problem of the decision, will briefly explain the history of the decision. The decision under review is based on the performers related rights. The diversification of technological possibilities has had a direct impact on the field of intellectual property rights. Thus, the redefinition of the content of the right is on the agenda. Code of Intellectual and Artistic Works also protects some works that do not constitute an intellectual product that can be considered a work. These rights are referred to as related rights. This study analyses the impact of the related rights regime, the effects, and the consequences of the amendment both on the content of the right and transactions prior to the amendment. The decision will be examined from the point of view of the law of obligations and copyright law. Lastly, the question of the chronological application of the provisions of the law to the transfer of intellectual property rights has also been addressed.

 The subject of this study is the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation of 01.12.2022 decision. This decision, also known as the Kemal Sunal decision, is a decision that has been followed by the media and its results have found a place in the press. In our opinion, the decision is also worth analysing to show the impact of technological development and the diversification and change in the form of broadcasting activities on the field of intellectual property rights. In this context, this study, after identifying the legal problem of the decision, will briefly explain the history of the decision. The decision under review is based on the performers related rights. The diversification of technological possibilities has had a direct impact on the field of intellectual property rights. Thus, the redefinition of the content of the right is on the agenda. Code of Intellectual and Artistic Works also protects some works that do not constitute an intellectual product that can be considered a work. These rights are referred to as related rights. This study analyses the impact of the related rights regime, the effects, and the consequences of the amendment both on the content of the right and transactions prior to the amendment. The decision will be examined from the point of view of the law of obligations and copyright law. Lastly, the question of the chronological application of the provisions of the law to the transfer of intellectual property rights has also been addressed.

 The subject of this study is the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation of 01.12.2022 decision. This decision, also known as the Kemal Sunal decision, is a decision that has been followed by the media and its results have found a place in the press. In our opinion, the decision is also worth analysing to show the impact of technological development and the diversification and change in the form of broadcasting activities on the field of intellectual property rights. In this context, this study, after identifying the legal problem of the decision, will briefly explain the history of the decision. The decision under review is based on the performers related rights. The diversification of technological possibilities has had a direct impact on the field of intellectual property rights. Thus, the redefinition of the content of the right is on the agenda. Code of Intellectual and Artistic Works also protects some works that do not constitute an intellectual product that can be considered a work. These rights are referred to as related rights. This study analyses the impact of the related rights regime, the effects, and the consequences of the amendment both on the content of the right and transactions prior to the amendment. The decision will be examined from the point of view of the law of obligations and copyright law. Lastly, the question of the chronological application of the provisions of the law to the transfer of intellectual property rights has also been addressed.

 Bu çalışmanın konusunu Yargıtay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 01.12.2022 tarihli kararı oluşturmaktadır. Kemal Sunal kararı olarak da isimlendirilen bu karar medya tarafından da takip edilen ve sonuçları basında kendisine yer bulmuş bir karardır. Karar kanaatimizce teknolojik gelişmenin ve yayın faaliyetlerinin çeşitlenmesinin, şekil değiştirmesinin fikri haklar alanına etkilerini göstermesi yönüyle de inceleme değerdir. Bu çerçevede işbu çalışmada karardaki hukuki sorun tespit edildikten sonra kararın tarihçesi kısaca açıklanmıştır. İnceleme konusu kararın temelinde icracı sanatçının bağlantılı hakları yer almaktadır. Teknolojik imkânların çeşitlenmesi, fikri haklar alanını da doğrudan etkilemiştir. Böylece hakkın içeriğinin yeniden tanımlanması gündeme gelmiştir. 5856 sayılı FSEK, eser sayılabilecek bir fikri ürünü meydana getirmeyen bazı çalışmaları da koruma altına almıştır. Bu haklar ise bağlantılı hak olarak isimlendirilmektedir. İşbu çalışmada da bağlantılı haklar düzenlemesinin bir diğer ifadeyle Kanun değişikliğinin telif hakkının içeriğine etkisinin, değişiklik öncesi tasarruflara etkisi hem borçlar hukuku hem de telif hukuku yönüyle Yargıtay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun kararı çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Buna ek olarak fikri haklara yönelik tasarruflara Kanun hükümlerinin zaman bakımından nasıl uygulanacağı sorusuna da temas edilmiştir.

Makale detayları

IMPACT OF LEGAL AMENDMENTS ON INTELLECTUAL AND ARTISTIC WORKS HOLDERS: KEMAL SUNAL CASE

Yazarlar:

Elif Beyza Akkanat Öztürk | Orhan Gazi Sarıdağ

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.139-148

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001323210

pISSN:

2149-4576

related rights

performing artist

disposals for intellectual property rights

temporal application

ratione temporisBağlantılı haklar

icracı sanatçı

fikri hakka yönelik tasarruflar

zaman bakımından uygulama

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Elif Beyza Akkanat Öztürk | Orhan Gazi Sarıdağ

Yayıncı: Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.139-148

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001323210

pISSN: 2149-4576

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Elif Beyza Akkanat Öztürk | Orhan Gazi Sarıdağ

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 1, pp.139-148

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001323210

pISSN:

2149-4576