LİABİLİTY FOR DAMAGES DUE TO EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE

Efe Can Yıldırır

Makale detayları

LİABİLİTY FOR DAMAGES DUE TO EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE

Yazarlar:

Efe Can Yıldırır

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.531-600

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314727

pISSN:

2147-768X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 One of the most concrete scientific facts about the geography in which it is located is that our country is located in the seismic zone. As a result of earthquake disasters that occur every ten years, thousands of people lose their lives or become disabled and suffer significant property losses. Considering that it is not the earthquake but the lack of precaution that causes these losses, it is of great importance that those responsible are identified and subjected to effective sanctions in order to minimize the losses in natural disasters that will occur in the future. The purpose of this article, written considering scientific methods, is to both raise awareness about the responsibilities that may arise regarding private law in the context of earthquakes and to provide a guiding study to academics and our colleagues in practice. In this article, liability arising from private law has been examined in depth in terms of both contractual liability and tort liability. In contractual liability, the impact of collapse or severe damage to buildings, especially during an earthquake, on sales, rental and work contracts involving the relevant real estate has been examined, taking into account both general provisions and consumer law. Enforcement problems that have arisen due to changes in laws containing both general and special provisions in recent years have also been discussed, taking into account various possibilities. In the fourth part of the study, tort liability is included. Each element of this debt source was first summarized and explained, and then the legal consequences that emerged after the earthquake were specifically examined. While the opinions and determinations in Turkish and Swiss doctrine were used in the summary information about the relevant element, the Supreme Court decisions were highlighted in the evaluations made in the context of the earthquake.

 One of the most concrete scientific facts about the geography in which it is located is that our country is located in the seismic zone. As a result of earthquake disasters that occur every ten years, thousands of people lose their lives or become disabled and suffer significant property losses. Considering that it is not the earthquake but the lack of precaution that causes these losses, it is of great importance that those responsible are identified and subjected to effective sanctions in order to minimize the losses in natural disasters that will occur in the future. The purpose of this article, written considering scientific methods, is to both raise awareness about the responsibilities that may arise regarding private law in the context of earthquakes and to provide a guiding study to academics and our colleagues in practice. In this article, liability arising from private law has been examined in depth in terms of both contractual liability and tort liability. In contractual liability, the impact of collapse or severe damage to buildings, especially during an earthquake, on sales, rental and work contracts involving the relevant real estate has been examined, taking into account both general provisions and consumer law. Enforcement problems that have arisen due to changes in laws containing both general and special provisions in recent years have also been discussed, taking into account various possibilities. In the fourth part of the study, tort liability is included. Each element of this debt source was first summarized and explained, and then the legal consequences that emerged after the earthquake were specifically examined. While the opinions and determinations in Turkish and Swiss doctrine were used in the summary information about the relevant element, the Supreme Court decisions were highlighted in the evaluations made in the context of the earthquake.

 One of the most concrete scientific facts about the geography in which it is located is that our country is located in the seismic zone. As a result of earthquake disasters that occur every ten years, thousands of people lose their lives or become disabled and suffer significant property losses. Considering that it is not the earthquake but the lack of precaution that causes these losses, it is of great importance that those responsible are identified and subjected to effective sanctions in order to minimize the losses in natural disasters that will occur in the future. The purpose of this article, written considering scientific methods, is to both raise awareness about the responsibilities that may arise regarding private law in the context of earthquakes and to provide a guiding study to academics and our colleagues in practice. In this article, liability arising from private law has been examined in depth in terms of both contractual liability and tort liability. In contractual liability, the impact of collapse or severe damage to buildings, especially during an earthquake, on sales, rental and work contracts involving the relevant real estate has been examined, taking into account both general provisions and consumer law. Enforcement problems that have arisen due to changes in laws containing both general and special provisions in recent years have also been discussed, taking into account various possibilities. In the fourth part of the study, tort liability is included. Each element of this debt source was first summarized and explained, and then the legal consequences that emerged after the earthquake were specifically examined. While the opinions and determinations in Turkish and Swiss doctrine were used in the summary information about the relevant element, the Supreme Court decisions were highlighted in the evaluations made in the context of the earthquake.

 ulunduğu coğrafyaya dair en somut bilimsel gerçekliklerin başında ülkemizin deprem kuşağında yer alması gelmektedir. Her on yılda bir gerçekleşen deprem felaketleri sonucunda binlerce insan hem yaşamını yitirmekte veya sakat kalmakta hem de önemli malvarlığı kayıplarına uğramaktadır. Depremin değil de tedbirsizliğin bu kayıplara neden olduğu dikkate alındığında gelecek zamanlarda gerçekleşecek doğal afetlerde kaybı en aza indirmek için sorumluların belirlenmesi ve etkin yaptırımlara tabi tutulmaları büyük önem arz etmektedir. Bilimsel yöntemler gözetilerek kaleme alınmış bu makalenin amacı da deprem bağlamında özel hukuka ilişkin doğabilecek sorumluluklara dair hem farkındalık yaratmak hem de akademisyenlere ve uygulamada yer alan meslektaşlarımıza yol gösterici bir çalışma sunmaktır. Bu makalede özel hukuktan doğan sorumluluk hem akdi sorumluluk hem de haksız fiil sorumluluğu bakımından derinlemesine incelenmiştir. Akdi sorumlulukta özellikle depremde binaların yıkılması veya ağır hasar görmesinin ilgili taşınmazı konu edinen satış, kira, eser sözleşmesine etkisi hem genel hükümler hem de tüketici hukuku göz önüne alınarak irdelenmiştir. Son yıllarda gerek genel gerek özel nitelikli hükümler içeren kanunlarda meydana gelen değişiklikler nedeniyle ortaya çıkan yürürlük sorunları da çeşitli olasılıklar göz önünde bulundurularak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın dördüncü bölümünde ise haksız fiil sorumluluğuna yer verilmiştir. Bu borç kaynağına dair her bir unsur öncelikle özetlenerek açıklanmış ardından da depremden sonra ortaya çıkan hukuki sonuçlar özel olarak incelenmiştir. İlgili unsura dair özet bilgilerde özellikle Türk ve İsviçre öğretisindeki görüşler ve saptamalardan yararlanılmış iken deprem bağlamında yapılan değerlendirmelerde ise yüksek mahkeme kararları öne çıkarılmıştır.

Makale detayları

LİABİLİTY FOR DAMAGES DUE TO EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE

Yazarlar:

Efe Can Yıldırır

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.531-600

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314727

pISSN:

2147-768X

Contractual Liability

Tort Liability

Statute of Limitations

Consumer

Damage.Akdi Sorumluluk

Haksız Fiil Sorumluluğu

Zamanaşımı

Tüketici

Zarar

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Efe Can Yıldırır

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.531-600

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001314727

pISSN: 2147-768X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Efe Can Yıldırır

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk Teorisi | İçtihat ve Hukuki Yorum | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.531-600

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314727

pISSN:

2147-768X