ASSESSMENT OF SOME ISSUES RELATING TO INDIRECT VIOLATION OF PRIVILEGE OF REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Levent Biçer; Betül Aktaş

Makale detayları

ASSESSMENT OF SOME ISSUES RELATING TO INDIRECT VIOLATION OF PRIVILEGE OF REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Yazarlar:

Levent Biçer | Betül Aktaş

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.3-36

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283829

pISSN:

2651-4141

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In cases where there is a violation of the privilege of being represented on the board of directors stipulated in TCC 360, a special committee of privileged shareholders should be convened according to TCC 454. However, in practice, in some cases, it is observed that the TCC 360 privilege is excluded from this scope, even though it is violated. In this direction, in our study, the effects of quorum changes in the articles of association, granting veto right and changing the number of members of the board of directors on the privilege of TCC 360 were evaluated. It is possible for the privilege of being represented on the board of directors to become a stronger privilege by being supported by quorums and thus to increase the effect of the privilege. In such a case, weakening the effect of the privilege by changing the quorum should be evaluated within the scope of the violation in TCC 454 and a conclusion should be reached accordingly. Similarly, we reach the same conclusion in terms of the veto right granted with the TCC 360 privilege, based on the view that the veto right is a link with the privilege. Amending an article of the articles of association related to the concession and claiming that it has nothing to do with the concession leads to unlawful results. Because it is possible to weaken the effect of the privilege of being represented on the board of directors in the stated situation. In our study, the decisions of the Supreme Court on the issues mentioned were examined and evaluated.

 In cases where there is a violation of the privilege of being represented on the board of directors stipulated in TCC 360, a special committee of privileged shareholders should be convened according to TCC 454. However, in practice, in some cases, it is observed that the TCC 360 privilege is excluded from this scope, even though it is violated. In this direction, in our study, the effects of quorum changes in the articles of association, granting veto right and changing the number of members of the board of directors on the privilege of TCC 360 were evaluated. It is possible for the privilege of being represented on the board of directors to become a stronger privilege by being supported by quorums and thus to increase the effect of the privilege. In such a case, weakening the effect of the privilege by changing the quorum should be evaluated within the scope of the violation in TCC 454 and a conclusion should be reached accordingly. Similarly, we reach the same conclusion in terms of the veto right granted with the TCC 360 privilege, based on the view that the veto right is a link with the privilege. Amending an article of the articles of association related to the concession and claiming that it has nothing to do with the concession leads to unlawful results. Because it is possible to weaken the effect of the privilege of being represented on the board of directors in the stated situation. In our study, the decisions of the Supreme Court on the issues mentioned were examined and evaluated.

 In cases where there is a violation of the privilege of being represented on the board of directors stipulated in TCC 360, a special committee of privileged shareholders should be convened according to TCC 454. However, in practice, in some cases, it is observed that the TCC 360 privilege is excluded from this scope, even though it is violated. In this direction, in our study, the effects of quorum changes in the articles of association, granting veto right and changing the number of members of the board of directors on the privilege of TCC 360 were evaluated. It is possible for the privilege of being represented on the board of directors to become a stronger privilege by being supported by quorums and thus to increase the effect of the privilege. In such a case, weakening the effect of the privilege by changing the quorum should be evaluated within the scope of the violation in TCC 454 and a conclusion should be reached accordingly. Similarly, we reach the same conclusion in terms of the veto right granted with the TCC 360 privilege, based on the view that the veto right is a link with the privilege. Amending an article of the articles of association related to the concession and claiming that it has nothing to do with the concession leads to unlawful results. Because it is possible to weaken the effect of the privilege of being represented on the board of directors in the stated situation. In our study, the decisions of the Supreme Court on the issues mentioned were examined and evaluated.

 TTK 360 hükmünde öngörülen yönetim kurulunda temsil edilme imtiyazının ihlalinin söz konusu olduğu hallerde TTK 454e göre imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurulunun toplanması gerekir. Ancak uygulamada bazı durumlarda TTK 360 imtiyazının ihlal edilmesine rağmen bu korumadan yararlandırılmadığı görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmamızda anasözleşmede nisap değişiklikleri, veto hakkı tanınması ve yönetim kurulu üye sayılarının değiştirilmesinin TTK 360 imtiyazına etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Yönetim kurulunda temsil edilme imtiyazının yetersayılarla desteklenerek daha güçlü bir imtiyaz haline gelmesi ve bu şekilde imtiyazın etkisinin artırılması mümkündür. Böyle bir ihtimalde yetersayılarda değişiklik yapılarak imtiyazın etkisinin zayıflatılması TTK 454 hükmünde yer alan ihlal kapsamında değerlendirilmeli ve buna göre sonuca varılmalıdır. Benzer şekilde, TTK 360 imtiyazı ile birlikte tanınan veto hakkı bakımından da veto hakkını imtiyazın bir bağlantısı olduğu görüşüne dayanarak aynı sonuca ulaşmaktayız. Anasözleşmenin imtiyaz ile bağlantılı bir maddesinin değiştirilerek, bunun imtiyaz ile ilgisinin bulunmadığının ileri sürülmesi hukuka aykırı sonuçların doğmasına yol açmaktadır. Zira belirtilen halde yönetim kurulunda temsil edilme imtiyazının etkisinin zayıflatılması mümkündür. Çalışmamızda belirtilen konularda verilen Yargıtay kararları incelenmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir.

Makale detayları

ASSESSMENT OF SOME ISSUES RELATING TO INDIRECT VIOLATION OF PRIVILEGE OF REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Yazarlar:

Levent Biçer | Betül Aktaş

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.3-36

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283829

pISSN:

2651-4141

Privilege

Privilege of Representation in the Board of Directors

Right of Veto

Quorums

Special Board of Preferred Shareholders.

İmtiyaz

Yönetim Kurulunda Temsil Edilme İmtiyazı

Veto Hakkı

Yetersayılar

İmtiyazlı Pay Sahipleri Özel Kurulu.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Levent Biçer | Betül Aktaş

Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.3-36

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001283829

pISSN: 2651-4141

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Levent Biçer | Betül Aktaş

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.3-36

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283829

pISSN:

2651-4141