THE REFERENTIAL PROPERTIES OF KENDİ/KENDİSİ PRONOUNS:  A DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE PERSPECTIVE

Esra Küçüksakarya; Murat Özgen

Makale detayları

THE REFERENTIAL PROPERTIES OF KENDİ/KENDİSİ PRONOUNS: A DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE PERSPECTIVE

Yazarlar:

Esra Küçüksakarya | Murat Özgen

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bütünce Dilbilimi | Dilsel Yapılar (Fonoloji | Morfoloji ve Sözdizimi dahil) | Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dil Dergisi Vol.175 Issue 2, pp.149-174

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337542

pISSN:

1300-3542

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Reflexive pronouns kendi and kendisi are of two types: nominative and inflected. Observationally, kendi as a reflexive pronoun can be bound to a local antecedent, while kendisi as a logophor can be bound to the subject of the main clause. However, the pronoun kendi can be connected to both an intra-sentential and inter-sentential antecedent. The antecedent-referent relation, analyzed in terms of morpho-syntactic and semantic aspects according to the Principle A of the Binding Theory within the scope of UG, is subject to the fields of discourse-pragmatics and textlinguistics regarding Cohesion Principle of Textuality Criteria TC. By means of TC, reflexives, replaced with another unit, contribute to the semantic integrity of the text forming grammatical cohesion inter-sententially. From these two perspectives, UG is deductive, and TC is inductive. In line with these views, the aim of the study is to analyze the intra-sentential and inter-sentential representations of kendi and kendisi regarding the binding phenomenon according to syntactic and textual conditions in a theoretical and practical way by scanning 1000 tokens from the TS Corpus V2. Accordingly, considering the inflected, bare intra-sentential forms and inter-sentential referential properties, it has been observed that the kendi and kendisi are structured in seven subcategories. It has been found that the intra-sentential form of kendi and the inter-sentential form of kendisi occur more frequently, and that the anaphora is used more frequently than the cataphora. It has also been observed that ambiguous sentences derived deductively are not found in inductively analyzed corpus, and that there is a positive relationship between the pronouns, although there is no statistically significant difference regarding subcategories. This study differs from the previous studies in that it evaluates the two aspects of the pronouns kendi and kendisi, which are theoretically and practically analyzed from the formalist and functionalist perspectives deductive and inductive in the literature. In addition to employing the native speakers intuitions and judgments to determine the formal features, analyzing them by comparing them with the written texts in the TS Corpus V2 database will contribute to further studies to be conducted on the form-function axis.

 Reflexive pronouns kendi and kendisi are of two types: nominative and inflected. Observationally, kendi as a reflexive pronoun can be bound to a local antecedent, while kendisi as a logophor can be bound to the subject of the main clause. However, the pronoun kendi can be connected to both an intra-sentential and inter-sentential antecedent. The antecedent-referent relation, analyzed in terms of morpho-syntactic and semantic aspects according to the Principle A of the Binding Theory within the scope of UG, is subject to the fields of discourse-pragmatics and textlinguistics regarding Cohesion Principle of Textuality Criteria TC. By means of TC, reflexives, replaced with another unit, contribute to the semantic integrity of the text forming grammatical cohesion inter-sententially. From these two perspectives, UG is deductive, and TC is inductive. In line with these views, the aim of the study is to analyze the intra-sentential and inter-sentential representations of kendi and kendisi regarding the binding phenomenon according to syntactic and textual conditions in a theoretical and practical way by scanning 1000 tokens from the TS Corpus V2. Accordingly, considering the inflected, bare intra-sentential forms and inter-sentential referential properties, it has been observed that the kendi and kendisi are structured in seven subcategories. It has been found that the intra-sentential form of kendi and the inter-sentential form of kendisi occur more frequently, and that the anaphora is used more frequently than the cataphora. It has also been observed that ambiguous sentences derived deductively are not found in inductively analyzed corpus, and that there is a positive relationship between the pronouns, although there is no statistically significant difference regarding subcategories. This study differs from the previous studies in that it evaluates the two aspects of the pronouns kendi and kendisi, which are theoretically and practically analyzed from the formalist and functionalist perspectives deductive and inductive in the literature. In addition to employing the native speakers intuitions and judgments to determine the formal features, analyzing them by comparing them with the written texts in the TS Corpus V2 database will contribute to further studies to be conducted on the form-function axis.

 Reflexive pronouns kendi and kendisi are of two types: nominative and inflected. Observationally, kendi as a reflexive pronoun can be bound to a local antecedent, while kendisi as a logophor can be bound to the subject of the main clause. However, the pronoun kendi can be connected to both an intra-sentential and inter-sentential antecedent. The antecedent-referent relation, analyzed in terms of morpho-syntactic and semantic aspects according to the Principle A of the Binding Theory within the scope of UG, is subject to the fields of discourse-pragmatics and textlinguistics regarding Cohesion Principle of Textuality Criteria TC. By means of TC, reflexives, replaced with another unit, contribute to the semantic integrity of the text forming grammatical cohesion inter-sententially. From these two perspectives, UG is deductive, and TC is inductive. In line with these views, the aim of the study is to analyze the intra-sentential and inter-sentential representations of kendi and kendisi regarding the binding phenomenon according to syntactic and textual conditions in a theoretical and practical way by scanning 1000 tokens from the TS Corpus V2. Accordingly, considering the inflected, bare intra-sentential forms and inter-sentential referential properties, it has been observed that the kendi and kendisi are structured in seven subcategories. It has been found that the intra-sentential form of kendi and the inter-sentential form of kendisi occur more frequently, and that the anaphora is used more frequently than the cataphora. It has also been observed that ambiguous sentences derived deductively are not found in inductively analyzed corpus, and that there is a positive relationship between the pronouns, although there is no statistically significant difference regarding subcategories. This study differs from the previous studies in that it evaluates the two aspects of the pronouns kendi and kendisi, which are theoretically and practically analyzed from the formalist and functionalist perspectives deductive and inductive in the literature. In addition to employing the native speakers intuitions and judgments to determine the formal features, analyzing them by comparing them with the written texts in the TS Corpus V2 database will contribute to further studies to be conducted on the form-function axis.

 Kendi ve kendisi dönüşlülük adılları yalın ve çekimli biçimlerde iki türden oluşur. Gözlemsel açıdan kendi bir dönüşlü adıl olarak yerel bir öncülle bağlanırken; kendisi ise uzun soluklu bir gönderge olarak ana tümcenin öznesine bağlanabilir. Bununla birlikte, kendi adılı hem tümceiçi hem tümcedışı bir öncülle bağlanabilir. Üretici Dilbilgisi ÜD kapsamında biçimsözdizimsel ve anlambilimsel açıdan incelenen öncül-gönderge ilişkisi; Metinsellik Ölçütlerinin MÖ Bağlaşıklık İlkesi çerçevesinde ise söylem-edim ve metindilbilim alanına konu olmaktadır. MÖ kapsamında başkaca bir birimin yerini tutan metiniçi dilsel ögeler olarak dönüşlülük adılları, tümcelerarası dilbilgisel bağlaşıklık kurmaktadır. Sözü geçen iki bakış açısından ÜD tümdengelimli, MÖ tümevarımlı bir bakış açısıdır. Bu görüşler doğrultusunda, araştırmanın amacı TS Corpus V2 veritabanından 1000 sözceyi tarayarak kendi ve kendisi adıllarının tümceiçi ve tümcelerarası sunuluşlarını, sözdizim ve metinsellik koşullarına göre bağlama olgusu açısından değerlendirip kuramsal ve uygulamalı bir biçimde incelemektir. Buna göre, tümce içindeki gönderimlerin çekimli, çekimsiz biçimlenmeleri ve tümcelerarası göndergesel özellikleri dikkate alındığında, kendi ve kendisi adıllarının yedi alt ulamda yapılandığı gözlemlenmiştir. Kendi adılının tümceiçi artgönderim kurulumunun, kendisi adılının ise tümcelerarası artgönderim kurulumunun daha sık gerçekleştiği ve artgönderimin öngönderimden daha sık kullanıldığı saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, tümdengelimle türetilen anlam bulanıklığına sahip tümcelerin, tümevarımla incelenen derlemde bulunmadığı ve ulamlar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmasa da iki adıl arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Alanyazında kuramsal ve uygulamalı olarak biçimci ve işlevci bakış açılarıyla tümdengelim ve tümevarım ele alınan kendi ve kendisi adıllarının her iki düzlem ekseninde değerlendirilmesi bu çalışmayı önceki araştırmalardan ayırır. Ayrıca, biçimsel özelliklerin saptanması için anadil konuşucusunun sezgi ve yargılarının benimsenmesinin yanı sıra veritabanında yer alan yazılı metinlerle karşılaştırarak incelemek biçim-işlev ekseninde yürütülecek başkaca çalışmalara katkı sağlayacaktır.

Makale detayları

THE REFERENTIAL PROPERTIES OF KENDİ/KENDİSİ PRONOUNS: A DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE PERSPECTIVE

Yazarlar:

Esra Küçüksakarya | Murat Özgen

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bütünce Dilbilimi | Dilsel Yapılar (Fonoloji | Morfoloji ve Sözdizimi dahil) | Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dil Dergisi Vol.175 Issue 2, pp.149-174

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337542

pISSN:

1300-3542

Reflexive pronoun

Binding conditions

Referential properties

Deduction

InductionDönüşlülük adılı

Bağlama koşulları

Göndergesel özellikler

Tümdengelim

Tümevarım

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Esra Küçüksakarya | Murat Özgen

Yayıncı: Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar: Bütünce Dilbilimi | Dilsel Yapılar (Fonoloji | Morfoloji ve Sözdizimi dahil) | Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi: Dil Dergisi Vol.175 Issue 2, pp.149-174

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001337542

pISSN: 1300-3542

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Esra Küçüksakarya | Murat Özgen

Yayıncı:

Ankara University

Ana Başlıklar:

Bütünce Dilbilimi | Dilsel Yapılar (Fonoloji | Morfoloji ve Sözdizimi dahil) | Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dil Dergisi Vol.175 Issue 2, pp.149-174

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337542

pISSN:

1300-3542