Examination of Soil Analysis Applications and Soil Analysis Subsidies in terms of Producers in Edirne and Tekirdağ Provinces

Başak Aydın; Erol Özkan; Emel Kayalı; Volkan Atav; Mehmet Ali Gürbüz; İlker Kurşun; İhsan Engin Kayhan

Makale detayları

Examination of Soil Analysis Applications and Soil Analysis Subsidies in terms of Producers in Edirne and Tekirdağ Provinces

Yazarlar:

Başak Aydın | Erol Özkan | Emel Kayalı | Volkan Atav | Mehmet Ali Gürbüz | İlker Kurşun | İhsan Engin Kayhan

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Dergi:

Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.25-40

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281936

pISSN:

1302-7050

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the importance of the differences in terms of some socio-economic factors and agricultural practices of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces and to evaluate the opinions of the producers about soil analysis and soil analysis subsidies. Three laboratories were selected among the laboratories with the highest number of sample acceptances for soil analysis in the provinces determined in the study. For each province, total of 60 producers who applied to the laboratories in 2015 and who utilized from soil analysis subsidies, and consequently, total of 120 producers were interviewed. The analysis of the differences of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces was determined by the regression tree model CHAID analysis. According to the CHAID analysis, in which the provinces were taken as the dependent variable, it was seen that the first most distinctive feature was the state-supported agricultural insurance. Of the producers who stated that they did not have agricultural insurance, 31 were located in Edirne and 69 were located in Tekirdağ. It was seen that 56 of the producers in Edirne and 44 of the producers in Tekirdağ had agricultural insurance. The most important feature of the second node was the education level of the producers, the third sub-node decision point was whether the producers had training on fertilization, and the fourth decision point was whether the producers faced risks in agriculture in the last three years. The four most important reasons for the producers to have soil analysis in Edirne province were to increase the product yield, to reduce the cost, to increase product quality and protect the environment, respectively. In the province of Tekirdağ, the criteria of increasing the product yield was on the first rank, increasing the product quality in the second rank, reducing the cost in the third rank and protecting the environment in the fourth rank. It is expected that it will be beneficial to introduce soil analysis conditions to the producers at the stage of purchasing fertilizers, and thus to ensure that the producer purchases fertilizer by determining the type and amount of fertilizer to be disposed of according to the analysis results.

 The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the importance of the differences in terms of some socio-economic factors and agricultural practices of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces and to evaluate the opinions of the producers about soil analysis and soil analysis subsidies. Three laboratories were selected among the laboratories with the highest number of sample acceptances for soil analysis in the provinces determined in the study. For each province, total of 60 producers who applied to the laboratories in 2015 and who utilized from soil analysis subsidies, and consequently, total of 120 producers were interviewed. The analysis of the differences of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces was determined by the regression tree model CHAID analysis. According to the CHAID analysis, in which the provinces were taken as the dependent variable, it was seen that the first most distinctive feature was the state-supported agricultural insurance. Of the producers who stated that they did not have agricultural insurance, 31 were located in Edirne and 69 were located in Tekirdağ. It was seen that 56 of the producers in Edirne and 44 of the producers in Tekirdağ had agricultural insurance. The most important feature of the second node was the education level of the producers, the third sub-node decision point was whether the producers had training on fertilization, and the fourth decision point was whether the producers faced risks in agriculture in the last three years. The four most important reasons for the producers to have soil analysis in Edirne province were to increase the product yield, to reduce the cost, to increase product quality and protect the environment, respectively. In the province of Tekirdağ, the criteria of increasing the product yield was on the first rank, increasing the product quality in the second rank, reducing the cost in the third rank and protecting the environment in the fourth rank. It is expected that it will be beneficial to introduce soil analysis conditions to the producers at the stage of purchasing fertilizers, and thus to ensure that the producer purchases fertilizer by determining the type and amount of fertilizer to be disposed of according to the analysis results.

 The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the importance of the differences in terms of some socio-economic factors and agricultural practices of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces and to evaluate the opinions of the producers about soil analysis and soil analysis subsidies. Three laboratories were selected among the laboratories with the highest number of sample acceptances for soil analysis in the provinces determined in the study. For each province, total of 60 producers who applied to the laboratories in 2015 and who utilized from soil analysis subsidies, and consequently, total of 120 producers were interviewed. The analysis of the differences of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces was determined by the regression tree model CHAID analysis. According to the CHAID analysis, in which the provinces were taken as the dependent variable, it was seen that the first most distinctive feature was the state-supported agricultural insurance. Of the producers who stated that they did not have agricultural insurance, 31 were located in Edirne and 69 were located in Tekirdağ. It was seen that 56 of the producers in Edirne and 44 of the producers in Tekirdağ had agricultural insurance. The most important feature of the second node was the education level of the producers, the third sub-node decision point was whether the producers had training on fertilization, and the fourth decision point was whether the producers faced risks in agriculture in the last three years. The four most important reasons for the producers to have soil analysis in Edirne province were to increase the product yield, to reduce the cost, to increase product quality and protect the environment, respectively. In the province of Tekirdağ, the criteria of increasing the product yield was on the first rank, increasing the product quality in the second rank, reducing the cost in the third rank and protecting the environment in the fourth rank. It is expected that it will be beneficial to introduce soil analysis conditions to the producers at the stage of purchasing fertilizers, and thus to ensure that the producer purchases fertilizer by determining the type and amount of fertilizer to be disposed of according to the analysis results.

 Bu çalışmanın amacı Edirne ve Tekirdağ illerinde toprak analizi yaptıran üreticilerin bazı sosyo ekonomik faktörler ve tarımsal uygulamalar yönünden farklılıklarının ve farklılıkların önem düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve üreticilerin toprak analizi ve toprak analizi destekleri ile ilgili görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Araştırmada belirlenen illerde toprak analizi için numune kabul sayısı en fazla olan laboratuvarlar arasından 3 adet laboratuvar seçilmiştir. Her il için 2015 yılında laboratuvarlara başvuran ve toprak analiz desteğinden yararlanan üreticilerden toplamda 60 üretici olmak üzere, toplamda 120 üretici ile görüşülmüştür. Edirne ve Tekirdağ illerinde toprak analizi yaptıran üreticilerin farklılıklarının analizi regresyon ağacı modeli CHAID analizi ile belirlenmiştir. İllerin bağımlı değişken olarak alındığı CHAID analizine göre, birinci en belirgin özelliğin devlet destekli tarım sigortası yaptırma olduğu görülmüştür. Tarım sigortası yaptırmadığını ifade eden üreticilerin 31i Edirne ilinde, 69u Tekirdağ ilinde yer almaktadır. Edirne ilinde üreticilerin 56sının, Tekirdağ ilinde üreticilerin 44ünün tarım sigortası yaptırdıkları görülmektedir. İkinci düğüm noktasının en önemli özelliği, üreticilerin eğitim düzeyleri, üçüncü alt düğüm karar noktasında üreticilerin gübreleme ile ilgili eğitim alıp almama durumları, dördüncü karar noktasında ise üreticilerin son üç yıl içinde tarımda riskle karşılaşıp karşılaşmama durumları yer almaktadır. Edirne ilinde üreticilerin toprak analizi yaptırmalarındaki en önemli dört nedenin sırasıyla ürün verimini arttırmak, maliyeti düşürmek, ürün kalitesini arttırmak ve çevreyi korumak olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tekirdağ ilinde de ilk sırayı ürün verimini arttırmak kriteri almakta olup, ikinci sırayı ürün kalitesini arttırmak, üçüncü sırayı maliyeti düşürmek ve dördüncü sırayı çevreyi korumak kriterleri almaktadır. Üreticilere gübre satın alma aşamasında toprak analizi şartının getirilmesinin, dolayısıyla analiz sonuçlarına göre atılması gereken gübre cinsi ve miktarının belirlenerek üreticinin gübre satın almasının sağlanmasının faydalı olacağı beklenmektedir.

Makale detayları

Examination of Soil Analysis Applications and Soil Analysis Subsidies in terms of Producers in Edirne and Tekirdağ Provinces

Yazarlar:

Başak Aydın | Erol Özkan | Emel Kayalı | Volkan Atav | Mehmet Ali Gürbüz | İlker Kurşun | İhsan Engin Kayhan

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Dergi:

Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.25-40

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281936

pISSN:

1302-7050

Regression tree

Soil analysis

Soil analysis subsidy

Producer opinion

Regresyon ağacı

Toprak Analizi

Toprak Analiz Desteği

Üretici Görüşü

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Başak Aydın | Erol Özkan | Emel Kayalı | Volkan Atav | Mehmet Ali Gürbüz | İlker Kurşun | İhsan Engin Kayhan

Yayıncı: Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Dergi: Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.25-40

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001281936

pISSN: 1302-7050

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Başak Aydın | Erol Özkan | Emel Kayalı | Volkan Atav | Mehmet Ali Gürbüz | İlker Kurşun | İhsan Engin Kayhan

Yayıncı:

Tekirdag Namik Kemal University

Dergi:

Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.25-40

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001281936

pISSN:

1302-7050