An Assessment on Ignaz Goldziher's Impartiality (Specific to His Study Islamic Cultural Studies 1-2)

Ahmet Emin Seyhan

Makale detayları

An Assessment on Ignaz Goldziher's Impartiality (Specific to His Study Islamic Cultural Studies 1-2)

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Emin Seyhan

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Pamukkale Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.657-683

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001304456

pISSN:

2148-4899

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Peoples beliefs, sects, races, identities, worldviews, mentalities, knowledge, experiences, etc. it is effective in evaluating facts and events. Some of the people, under the influence of these belongings, may not see the truth, can approach issues ideologically, cover up the facts, act with prejudices by losing their impartiality, or make purposeful evaluations by appearing impartial. However, very few people manage to remain neutral in their assessments. The reason for writing this article is to examine whether Goldziher remained neutral in his research on Islam. As far as we can determine, there is no other study that addresses the issue of Goldzihers impartiality in his approach to Islam, Quran, Muhammad and hadiths. This study was carried out in order to fill this gap and to introduce him correctly. While investigating Goldzihers impartiality in the article, one of his most important works, Muhammedanische Studien Islamic Cultural Studies 1-2, was taken as a basis, and other scientific studies examining his various aspects were also used. The article was limited to Goldzihers approach to Islam, Quran, Muhammad and hadiths. At the end of the article, it was concluded that Goldziher ignored the truths in order to reach the conclusions he had constructed in his mind, made arbitrary and forced interpretations, distorted the facts and lost his impartiality.

 Peoples beliefs, sects, races, identities, worldviews, mentalities, knowledge, experiences, etc. it is effective in evaluating facts and events. Some of the people, under the influence of these belongings, may not see the truth, can approach issues ideologically, cover up the facts, act with prejudices by losing their impartiality, or make purposeful evaluations by appearing impartial. However, very few people manage to remain neutral in their assessments. The reason for writing this article is to examine whether Goldziher remained neutral in his research on Islam. As far as we can determine, there is no other study that addresses the issue of Goldzihers impartiality in his approach to Islam, Quran, Muhammad and hadiths. This study was carried out in order to fill this gap and to introduce him correctly. While investigating Goldzihers impartiality in the article, one of his most important works, Muhammedanische Studien Islamic Cultural Studies 1-2, was taken as a basis, and other scientific studies examining his various aspects were also used. The article was limited to Goldzihers approach to Islam, Quran, Muhammad and hadiths. At the end of the article, it was concluded that Goldziher ignored the truths in order to reach the conclusions he had constructed in his mind, made arbitrary and forced interpretations, distorted the facts and lost his impartiality.

 Peoples beliefs, sects, races, identities, worldviews, mentalities, knowledge, experiences, etc. it is effective in evaluating facts and events. Some of the people, under the influence of these belongings, may not see the truth, can approach issues ideologically, cover up the facts, act with prejudices by losing their impartiality, or make purposeful evaluations by appearing impartial. However, very few people manage to remain neutral in their assessments. The reason for writing this article is to examine whether Goldziher remained neutral in his research on Islam. As far as we can determine, there is no other study that addresses the issue of Goldzihers impartiality in his approach to Islam, Quran, Muhammad and hadiths. This study was carried out in order to fill this gap and to introduce him correctly. While investigating Goldzihers impartiality in the article, one of his most important works, Muhammedanische Studien Islamic Cultural Studies 1-2, was taken as a basis, and other scientific studies examining his various aspects were also used. The article was limited to Goldzihers approach to Islam, Quran, Muhammad and hadiths. At the end of the article, it was concluded that Goldziher ignored the truths in order to reach the conclusions he had constructed in his mind, made arbitrary and forced interpretations, distorted the facts and lost his impartiality.

 İnsanların inançları, mezhepleri, ırkları, kimlikleri, dünya görüşleri, zihniyetleri, bilgi birikimleri, tecrübeleri vs. olgu ve olayları değerlendirmelerine etki eder. Bazı insanlar bu aidiyetlerinin tesirinde kalarak doğruları göremeyebilir, meselelere ideolojik yaklaşabilir, gerçeklerin üzerini örtebilir, tarafsızlıklarını yitirip önyargılarla hareket edebilir veya tarafsız görünerek maksatlı değerlendirmelerde bulunabilir. Ancak insanların çok azı analizlerinde tarafsız kalmayı başarabilir. Bu makalenin yazılma nedeni Goldziherin İslâm ile ilgili çalışmalarında tarafsız kalıp kalmadığını araştırmaktır. Tespit edebildiğimiz kadarıyla Goldziherin İslâm, Kurân, Hz. Muhammed ve hadislere yaklaşımında tarafsızlığını inceleyen müstakil bir çalışma yoktur. Hem bu boşluğu doldurmak hem de onun doğru tanıtılmasına katkı sunmak amacıyla bu makale yazılmıştır. Makalede Goldziherin tarafsızlığı araştırılırken Muhammedanische Studien adlı çalışması esas alınmış, ayrıca onun farklı yönlerini inceleyen muhtelif araştırmalardan da istifade edilmiştir. Makale, onun İslâm, Kurân, Hz. Muhammed ve hadislere yaklaşımıyla sınırlandırılmış, çalışmanın sonunda Goldziherin kafasında kurguladığı sonuçları elde etmek için hakikatleri görmezden geldiği, keyfî ve zorakî yorumlara yöneldiği, gerçekleri çarpıttığı ve tarafsızlığını yitirdiği neticesine ulaşılmıştır.

Makale detayları

An Assessment on Ignaz Goldziher's Impartiality (Specific to His Study Islamic Cultural Studies 1-2)

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Emin Seyhan

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Pamukkale Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.657-683

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001304456

pISSN:

2148-4899

Hadith

Islam

Hz. Muhammed

Ignaz Goldziher

Orientalism.Hadis

İslâm

Hz. Muhammed

Ignaz Goldziher

Oryantalizm

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ahmet Emin Seyhan

Yayıncı: Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar: Hadis

Dergi: Pamukkale Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.657-683

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001304456

pISSN: 2148-4899

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Emin Seyhan

Yayıncı:

Pamukkale University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hadis

Dergi:

Pamukkale Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.657-683

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001304456

pISSN:

2148-4899