Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Sergen Deniz; Mustafa Zortuk; Taha Yaşar Manav

Makale detayları

Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Yazarlar:

Sergen Deniz | Mustafa Zortuk | Taha Yaşar Manav

Yayıncı:

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry (Other)

Dergi:

Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.94-100

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001342925

pISSN:

2149-9063

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Introduction: This study aimed to examine the impact of repeated use of different implant impression analogs on the accuracy of the resulting impressions. Materials and Methods: Implant bodies from three brands Group SA: Straumann, Switzerland; Group DA: Dio Implant, South Korea; Group MA: Mode Implant, Turkey were used to create master models. Five reference casts were then fabricated for each brand n5 from these master models. Ten impressions were taken from each reference cast using the same analogs, which were sterilized between each impression. Both reference and working casts were digitized with a three-dimensional scanner. The working casts were aligned with their respective reference casts using software Geomagic, USA. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared groups, while one-way ANOVA compared impressions within each group. Multiple comparisons utilized Bonferroni, Tukeys HSD, and Tamhanes T2 tests, with significance set at P0.05. Results: The RMS value for Group SA was 0.002 mm for the first impression, while the first impression RMS values for the other two groups were 0.04 mm and 0.03 mm, respectively. By the tenth impression, the RMS value for Group SA had increased to 0.08 mm, while the tenth impression RMS values for Groups DA and MA had reached 0.14 mm. Group SA demonstrated statistically significant differences after the third impression, whereas Groups DA and MA exhibited significant differences after the first impression. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study demonstrated that repeated use of the same implant impression analog had a negative impact on impression accuracy.

 Introduction: This study aimed to examine the impact of repeated use of different implant impression analogs on the accuracy of the resulting impressions. Materials and Methods: Implant bodies from three brands Group SA: Straumann, Switzerland; Group DA: Dio Implant, South Korea; Group MA: Mode Implant, Turkey were used to create master models. Five reference casts were then fabricated for each brand n5 from these master models. Ten impressions were taken from each reference cast using the same analogs, which were sterilized between each impression. Both reference and working casts were digitized with a three-dimensional scanner. The working casts were aligned with their respective reference casts using software Geomagic, USA. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared groups, while one-way ANOVA compared impressions within each group. Multiple comparisons utilized Bonferroni, Tukeys HSD, and Tamhanes T2 tests, with significance set at P0.05. Results: The RMS value for Group SA was 0.002 mm for the first impression, while the first impression RMS values for the other two groups were 0.04 mm and 0.03 mm, respectively. By the tenth impression, the RMS value for Group SA had increased to 0.08 mm, while the tenth impression RMS values for Groups DA and MA had reached 0.14 mm. Group SA demonstrated statistically significant differences after the third impression, whereas Groups DA and MA exhibited significant differences after the first impression. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study demonstrated that repeated use of the same implant impression analog had a negative impact on impression accuracy.

 Introduction: This study aimed to examine the impact of repeated use of different implant impression analogs on the accuracy of the resulting impressions. Materials and Methods: Implant bodies from three brands Group SA: Straumann, Switzerland; Group DA: Dio Implant, South Korea; Group MA: Mode Implant, Turkey were used to create master models. Five reference casts were then fabricated for each brand n5 from these master models. Ten impressions were taken from each reference cast using the same analogs, which were sterilized between each impression. Both reference and working casts were digitized with a three-dimensional scanner. The working casts were aligned with their respective reference casts using software Geomagic, USA. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared groups, while one-way ANOVA compared impressions within each group. Multiple comparisons utilized Bonferroni, Tukeys HSD, and Tamhanes T2 tests, with significance set at P0.05. Results: The RMS value for Group SA was 0.002 mm for the first impression, while the first impression RMS values for the other two groups were 0.04 mm and 0.03 mm, respectively. By the tenth impression, the RMS value for Group SA had increased to 0.08 mm, while the tenth impression RMS values for Groups DA and MA had reached 0.14 mm. Group SA demonstrated statistically significant differences after the third impression, whereas Groups DA and MA exhibited significant differences after the first impression. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study demonstrated that repeated use of the same implant impression analog had a negative impact on impression accuracy.

 Introduction: This study aimed to examine the impact of repeated use of different implant impression analogs on the accuracy of the resulting impressions. Materials and Methods: Implant bodies from three brands Group SA: Straumann, Switzerland; Group DA: Dio Implant, South Korea; Group MA: Mode Implant, Turkey were used to create master models. Five reference casts were then fabricated for each brand n5 from these master models. Ten impressions were taken from each reference cast using the same analogs, which were sterilized between each impression. Both reference and working casts were digitized with a three-dimensional scanner. The working casts were aligned with their respective reference casts using software Geomagic, USA. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared groups, while one-way ANOVA compared impressions within each group. Multiple comparisons utilized Bonferroni, Tukeys HSD, and Tamhanes T2 tests, with significance set at P0.05. Results: The RMS value for Group SA was 0.002 mm for the first impression, while the first impression RMS values for the other two groups were 0.04 mm and 0.03 mm, respectively. By the tenth impression, the RMS value for Group SA had increased to 0.08 mm, while the tenth impression RMS values for Groups DA and MA had reached 0.14 mm. Group SA demonstrated statistically significant differences after the third impression, whereas Groups DA and MA exhibited significant differences after the first impression. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study demonstrated that repeated use of the same implant impression analog had a negative impact on impression accuracy.

Makale detayları

Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Yazarlar:

Sergen Deniz | Mustafa Zortuk | Taha Yaşar Manav

Yayıncı:

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry (Other)

Dergi:

Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.94-100

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001342925

pISSN:

2149-9063

dental implants

impression technic

dental prosthesis

Sayı

Makale detayları

Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Yazarlar: Sergen Deniz | Mustafa Zortuk | Taha Yaşar Manav

Yayıncı: Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar: Dentistry (Other)

Dergi: Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.94-100

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 3/2025

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001342925

pISSN: 2149-9063

dental implants

impression technic

dental prosthesis

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sergen Deniz | Mustafa Zortuk | Taha Yaşar Manav

Yayıncı:

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry (Other)

Dergi:

Meandros Medical And Dental Journal Vol.26 Issue 1, pp.94-100

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001342925

pISSN:

2149-9063