Cessâs's Deductions on the Issue of Making Wudu with the Date Nebiz: An Example of Abu Hanifa Advocacy

İbrahim Özpolat

Makale detayları

Cessâs's Deductions on the Issue of Making Wudu with the Date Nebiz: An Example of Abu Hanifa Advocacy

Yazarlar:

İbrahim Özpolat

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 2, pp.504-523

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001305163

pISSN:

2528-9861

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This research aims, first of all, to establish that Abû Hanîfas d. 150767 positive view on the issue of performing wudû with nabîdh of date is correct, and then to reveal Abû Hanîfas dalîls on this subject. The issue of wudû with nabîdh of date is controversial among early Hanafî jurists, and the jurist who expressed a positive opinion on this issue is Abû Hanîfa, the founding imam of the madhhab. The opinion that wudû can be performed with nabîdh of date is the strong opinion of Abû Hanîfa mentioned in zâhir al-riwâya. The riwâya reported by Nûh bin Abi Maryam d. 173789 stating that Abû Hanîfa reneged on this view is not strong enough to oppose the view in zâhir al-riwâya. For this reason, it is not a correct approach to ignore the view in zâhir al-riwâya based on this riwâya. As a matter of fact, Abû Hanîfas view of zâhir al-riwâya is conveyed in many of the classical Hanafî texts such as Mukhtasar al-Karkhi and Mukhtasar al-Tahâwî. Although the majority of Hanafî jurists preferred the view of Abû Yûsuf d. 182798, a significant group of Hanafî jurists such as Jassâs d. 370981, Kâshânî d. 5871191 and Aynî d. 8551451 He supports Abû Hanîfas view. Therefore, there are two views on the issue in Hanafî fıqh. In the literature, the dalîls of Abû Hanîfas view is not available as a whole in a single source, but is scattered in many Hanafî fiqh sources. The Hanafî jurist Jassâs is the one who deals with the mentioned dalîls in the most comprehensive way in his many works. For this reason, the subject was examined by focusing on Jassâss dalîls. Jassâs istidlâls regarding the issue of wudû with nabîdh of date also mean defending Abû Hanîfa against other Hanafî jurists such as Abu Yusuf and Imâm Muhammad d. 189805. Jassâs insistent attitude on this issue and his passionate counter-answers prove how much he deserves the title of defense. For the relevant determination, Hanafî fiqh classics are centered. Because the jurists who argue that wudû can be made with the nabîdh of date are among the Hanafî jurists. Then, the positive and negative approaches of the jurists about the nabîdh of date are given. Starting from the early Hanafî jurists, the views of the sahâbîs, the tâbiûn and many later jurists on the subject are included. The approach of the four madhhabs of fiqh is also examined in this section. Then, the istidlâls of Jassâs, which is the main subject of the research, were emphasized. It is seen that Jassâs istidlâls have three main pillars: âya, hadîth and idjma. As a âya, the 6th âya of the sûra of Mâida, as a hadîth, the hadîth of Abd Allâh bin Masûd r.a. and as a idjma, the the sahâbîs idjma tries to showas references. The most controversial dalîl is undoubtedly the hadiths of Ibn Masud r.a.. Jassâs opposes those who claim that the hadîth is daîf and discusses the hadîth with its detailed tarîks and argues that this hadîth is sahîh.

 This research aims, first of all, to establish that Abû Hanîfas d. 150767 positive view on the issue of performing wudû with nabîdh of date is correct, and then to reveal Abû Hanîfas dalîls on this subject. The issue of wudû with nabîdh of date is controversial among early Hanafî jurists, and the jurist who expressed a positive opinion on this issue is Abû Hanîfa, the founding imam of the madhhab. The opinion that wudû can be performed with nabîdh of date is the strong opinion of Abû Hanîfa mentioned in zâhir al-riwâya. The riwâya reported by Nûh bin Abi Maryam d. 173789 stating that Abû Hanîfa reneged on this view is not strong enough to oppose the view in zâhir al-riwâya. For this reason, it is not a correct approach to ignore the view in zâhir al-riwâya based on this riwâya. As a matter of fact, Abû Hanîfas view of zâhir al-riwâya is conveyed in many of the classical Hanafî texts such as Mukhtasar al-Karkhi and Mukhtasar al-Tahâwî. Although the majority of Hanafî jurists preferred the view of Abû Yûsuf d. 182798, a significant group of Hanafî jurists such as Jassâs d. 370981, Kâshânî d. 5871191 and Aynî d. 8551451 He supports Abû Hanîfas view. Therefore, there are two views on the issue in Hanafî fıqh. In the literature, the dalîls of Abû Hanîfas view is not available as a whole in a single source, but is scattered in many Hanafî fiqh sources. The Hanafî jurist Jassâs is the one who deals with the mentioned dalîls in the most comprehensive way in his many works. For this reason, the subject was examined by focusing on Jassâss dalîls. Jassâs istidlâls regarding the issue of wudû with nabîdh of date also mean defending Abû Hanîfa against other Hanafî jurists such as Abu Yusuf and Imâm Muhammad d. 189805. Jassâs insistent attitude on this issue and his passionate counter-answers prove how much he deserves the title of defense. For the relevant determination, Hanafî fiqh classics are centered. Because the jurists who argue that wudû can be made with the nabîdh of date are among the Hanafî jurists. Then, the positive and negative approaches of the jurists about the nabîdh of date are given. Starting from the early Hanafî jurists, the views of the sahâbîs, the tâbiûn and many later jurists on the subject are included. The approach of the four madhhabs of fiqh is also examined in this section. Then, the istidlâls of Jassâs, which is the main subject of the research, were emphasized. It is seen that Jassâs istidlâls have three main pillars: âya, hadîth and idjma. As a âya, the 6th âya of the sûra of Mâida, as a hadîth, the hadîth of Abd Allâh bin Masûd r.a. and as a idjma, the the sahâbîs idjma tries to showas references. The most controversial dalîl is undoubtedly the hadiths of Ibn Masud r.a.. Jassâs opposes those who claim that the hadîth is daîf and discusses the hadîth with its detailed tarîks and argues that this hadîth is sahîh.

 This research aims, first of all, to establish that Abû Hanîfas d. 150767 positive view on the issue of performing wudû with nabîdh of date is correct, and then to reveal Abû Hanîfas dalîls on this subject. The issue of wudû with nabîdh of date is controversial among early Hanafî jurists, and the jurist who expressed a positive opinion on this issue is Abû Hanîfa, the founding imam of the madhhab. The opinion that wudû can be performed with nabîdh of date is the strong opinion of Abû Hanîfa mentioned in zâhir al-riwâya. The riwâya reported by Nûh bin Abi Maryam d. 173789 stating that Abû Hanîfa reneged on this view is not strong enough to oppose the view in zâhir al-riwâya. For this reason, it is not a correct approach to ignore the view in zâhir al-riwâya based on this riwâya. As a matter of fact, Abû Hanîfas view of zâhir al-riwâya is conveyed in many of the classical Hanafî texts such as Mukhtasar al-Karkhi and Mukhtasar al-Tahâwî. Although the majority of Hanafî jurists preferred the view of Abû Yûsuf d. 182798, a significant group of Hanafî jurists such as Jassâs d. 370981, Kâshânî d. 5871191 and Aynî d. 8551451 He supports Abû Hanîfas view. Therefore, there are two views on the issue in Hanafî fıqh. In the literature, the dalîls of Abû Hanîfas view is not available as a whole in a single source, but is scattered in many Hanafî fiqh sources. The Hanafî jurist Jassâs is the one who deals with the mentioned dalîls in the most comprehensive way in his many works. For this reason, the subject was examined by focusing on Jassâss dalîls. Jassâs istidlâls regarding the issue of wudû with nabîdh of date also mean defending Abû Hanîfa against other Hanafî jurists such as Abu Yusuf and Imâm Muhammad d. 189805. Jassâs insistent attitude on this issue and his passionate counter-answers prove how much he deserves the title of defense. For the relevant determination, Hanafî fiqh classics are centered. Because the jurists who argue that wudû can be made with the nabîdh of date are among the Hanafî jurists. Then, the positive and negative approaches of the jurists about the nabîdh of date are given. Starting from the early Hanafî jurists, the views of the sahâbîs, the tâbiûn and many later jurists on the subject are included. The approach of the four madhhabs of fiqh is also examined in this section. Then, the istidlâls of Jassâs, which is the main subject of the research, were emphasized. It is seen that Jassâs istidlâls have three main pillars: âya, hadîth and idjma. As a âya, the 6th âya of the sûra of Mâida, as a hadîth, the hadîth of Abd Allâh bin Masûd r.a. and as a idjma, the the sahâbîs idjma tries to showas references. The most controversial dalîl is undoubtedly the hadiths of Ibn Masud r.a.. Jassâs opposes those who claim that the hadîth is daîf and discusses the hadîth with its detailed tarîks and argues that this hadîth is sahîh.

 Bu araştırma, öncelikle Ebû Hanîfenin öl. 150767 hurma nebizi ile abdest alma meselesine dair olumlu yöndeki görüşünün sahih olduğunu tespit, daha sonra Ebû Hanîfenin bu konudaki delillerinin ortaya konması amacını taşımaktadır. Hurma nebizi ile abdest alma meselesi, erken dönem Hanefî fakihleri arasında tartışmalı olup bu konuda olumlu görüş bildiren fakih, mezhebin kurucu imamı Ebû Hanîfedir. Hurma nebizi ile abdest alınabileceği görüşü, Ebû Hanîfenin zâhirür-rivâye kaynaklarda geçen güçlü görüşüdür. Nuh b. Ebî Meryemden öl. 173789 nakledilen ve Ebû Hanîfenin bu görüşten döndüğünü ifade eden rivayet, zâhirür-rivâyedeki görüşe karşı koyacak güçte değildir. Bu sebeple zâhirür-rivâyedeki görüşü bu rivayete dayanarak yok saymak doğru bir yaklaşım değildir. Nitekim Ebû Hanîfenin zâhirür-rivâye görüşü Muhtasarul-Kerhî ve Muhtasarut-Tahâvî gibi klasik Hanefî metinlerinin birçoğunda aktarılmaktadır. Hanefî fakihlerinin çoğunluğu Ebû Yûsufun öl. 182798 görüşünü tercih etse de Cessâs öl. 370981, Kâsânî öl. 5871191 ve Aynî öl. 8551451 gibi azımsanmayacak bir grup Hanefî fakihi Ebû Hanîfenin görüşünü desteklemektedir. Dolayısıyla meseleyle ilgili Hanefî fıkhında iki görüş vardır. Literatürde Ebû Hanîfenin görüşünün delilleri, bir bütün olarak tek bir kaynakta mevcut olmayıp birçok Hanefî fıkıh kaynağında dağınık olarak yer almaktadır. Mezkûr delilleri birçok eserinde en geniş şekilde ele alan Hanefî fakihi Cessâstır. Bu sebeple konu, Cessâsın delillendirmeleri merkeze alınarak incelenmiştir. Cessâsın hurma nebizi ile abdest alma meselesine dair istidlalleri aynı zamanda Ebû Yûsuf ve İmam Muhammed öl. 189805 gibi diğer Hanefî hukukçularına karşı Ebû Hanîfeyi savunma anlamı taşımaktadır. Cessâsın bu konudaki ısrarlı tavrı ve hararetli karşı cevapları savunma yakıştırmasını ne denli hak ettiğini kanıtlar niteliktedir. Çalışmaya öncelikle abdest alınabilirliğin tartışıldığı hurma nebizinin mahiyetinin tespiti ile başlanmıştır. İlgili tespit için Hanefî fıkıh klasikleri merkeze alınmıştır. Zira hurma nebizi ile abdest alınabileceğini savunan fakihler ağırlıklı olarak Hanefî fakihleri içerisindendir. Daha sonra genel olarak fakihlerin hurma nebizi ile ilgili olumlu ve olumsuz yaklaşımlarına yer verilmiştir. Erken dönem Hanefî fakihlerinden başlanmak üzere sahâbî, tâbiîn ve sonraki birçok fakihin konuyla ilgili görüşlerine yer verilmiştir. Dört fıkıh mezhebinin yaklaşımı da bu kısımda incelenmiştir. Ardından araştırmanın ana konusu olan Cessâsın istidlalleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Cessâsın istidlallerinin ayet, hadis ve icma olmak üzere üç delile dayandığı görülmektedir. Cessâs ayet olarak el-Mâide sûresi 56. ayet, hadis olarak Abdullah b. Mesûd r.a. hadisi ve icma olarak da sahâbî icmasını referans olarak göstermeye çalışmaktadır. Üzerinde an fazla polemik yapılan delil şüphesiz İbn Mesûd r.a. hadisidir. Cessâs, ilgili hadisin zayıf olduğunu öne sürenlere karşı çıkıp hadisi detaylı tarikleri ile birlikte ele almakta ve bu hadisin sahih olduğunu savunmaktadır.

Makale detayları

Cessâs's Deductions on the Issue of Making Wudu with the Date Nebiz: An Example of Abu Hanifa Advocacy

Yazarlar:

İbrahim Özpolat

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 2, pp.504-523

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001305163

pISSN:

2528-9861

Islamic law

date nebiz

ablution

Cessâs

Abu Hanifaİslam hukuku

hurma nebizi

abdest

Cessâs

Ebû Hanîfe

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: İbrahim Özpolat

Yayıncı: Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 2, pp.504-523

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001305163

pISSN: 2528-9861

Sayı

Yazarlar:

İbrahim Özpolat

Yayıncı:

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 2, pp.504-523

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001305163

pISSN:

2528-9861