The Meaning of the Veto Power, Its Regulation in Turkish Constitutions and Its Examination in Terms of the Characteristics of the Legislative Function

Onur Hamurcu

Makale detayları

The Meaning of the Veto Power, Its Regulation in Turkish Constitutions and Its Examination in Terms of the Characteristics of the Legislative Function

Yazarlar:

Onur Hamurcu

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.160-174

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314709

pISSN:

2147-768X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of the veto institution is to re-negotiate the laws that are thought to be erroneous or unlawful. The concept of veto and repatriation are technically two different concepts. This difference emerges in terms of the number of acceptances in the second interview. If the same text can be accepted in the second meeting without a different majority, the existence of an authority to send back is mentioned. However, if a different majority than the initial acceptance is envisaged, there is a veto power. The situation that appeared as an absolute veto in the pre-Republic period has evolved into a difficult veto power in its current form. It is extremely important to consider alternatives such as arranging the veto power of the legislative body in the form of a return, especially within the scope of the principle of substantiveness, giving the President the authority to file an annulment lawsuit before the laws come into force in order to avoid possible political conflicts, and subjecting the enacted text to judicial review before it comes into force.

 The aim of the veto institution is to re-negotiate the laws that are thought to be erroneous or unlawful. The concept of veto and repatriation are technically two different concepts. This difference emerges in terms of the number of acceptances in the second interview. If the same text can be accepted in the second meeting without a different majority, the existence of an authority to send back is mentioned. However, if a different majority than the initial acceptance is envisaged, there is a veto power. The situation that appeared as an absolute veto in the pre-Republic period has evolved into a difficult veto power in its current form. It is extremely important to consider alternatives such as arranging the veto power of the legislative body in the form of a return, especially within the scope of the principle of substantiveness, giving the President the authority to file an annulment lawsuit before the laws come into force in order to avoid possible political conflicts, and subjecting the enacted text to judicial review before it comes into force.

 The aim of the veto institution is to re-negotiate the laws that are thought to be erroneous or unlawful. The concept of veto and repatriation are technically two different concepts. This difference emerges in terms of the number of acceptances in the second interview. If the same text can be accepted in the second meeting without a different majority, the existence of an authority to send back is mentioned. However, if a different majority than the initial acceptance is envisaged, there is a veto power. The situation that appeared as an absolute veto in the pre-Republic period has evolved into a difficult veto power in its current form. It is extremely important to consider alternatives such as arranging the veto power of the legislative body in the form of a return, especially within the scope of the principle of substantiveness, giving the President the authority to file an annulment lawsuit before the laws come into force in order to avoid possible political conflicts, and subjecting the enacted text to judicial review before it comes into force.

 Veto kurumu ile hatalı ya da hukuka aykırı olduğunu düşünülen kanunların bir kez daha görüşülmesi amaçlanır. Veto ve geri gönderme kavramı teknik anlamda iki farklı kavramdır. Bu farklılık ikinci görüşmedeki kabul sayıları açısından ortaya çıkmaktadır. Şayet ikinci görüşmede aynı metin farklı bir çoğunluk öngörülmeden kabul edilebiliyorsa burada bir geri gönderme yetkisinin varlığından bahsedilmektedir. Bununla birlikte ilk kabulden daha farklı bir çoğunluk öngörülmüş ise burada bir veto yetkisi söz konusudur. Cumhuriyet öncesi dönemde mutlak veto şeklinde karşımıza çıkan durum mevcut haliyle güçleştirici veto yetkisine evrilmiştir. Yasama organının özellikle aslilik ilkesi kapsamında veto yetkisinin bir geri gönderme biçiminde düzenlenmesi, olası siyasi çatışmalardan kaçınmak adına Cumhurbaşkanına kanunların yürürlüğü öncesinde, iptal davası açma yetkisi vermek ve kanunlaşan metni yürürlüğe girmeden yargı denetimine tabi kılmak gibi alternatiflerin düşünülmesi son derece önemlidir.

Makale detayları

The Meaning of the Veto Power, Its Regulation in Turkish Constitutions and Its Examination in Terms of the Characteristics of the Legislative Function

Yazarlar:

Onur Hamurcu

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.160-174

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314709

pISSN:

2147-768X

Veto

Constitution

President

Legislative

LawVeto

Anayasa

Cumhurbaşkanı

Yasama

Kanun

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Onur Hamurcu

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.160-174

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001314709

pISSN: 2147-768X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Onur Hamurcu

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.12 Issue 1, pp.160-174

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001314709

pISSN:

2147-768X