A Study on Comparative Fiqh Education at the Undergraduate Level: A Comparison Between the Universities in Jordan and Turkey

Ayşe Aktaş Sivlim

Makale detayları

A Study on Comparative Fiqh Education at the Undergraduate Level: A Comparison Between the Universities in Jordan and Turkey

Yazarlar:

Ayşe Aktaş Sivlim

Yayıncı:

Bayburt University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Baberti Issue 19, pp.18-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Arapça

Document ID (Org No.):

2001322176

pISSN:

3023-4107

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this article, how and to what extent comparative fiqh Islamic law is applied as a method followed in fiqh education in Jordan and Turkey is discussed and compared. As a matter of fact, the fiqh education system in these two countries is different. In Jordan, theology faculties are basically divided into the usūl al-din and usul al-fiqh departments. In the Theology Faculties in Turkey, unlike in Jordan, there is no specialization specific to the science of fiqh during the undergraduate period. In Jordan, fiqh lessons are given in detail in the usul al-fiqh section, and these lessons are mostly taught comparatively by looking at different madhabs sects, which do not adhere to a single madhab. Fiqh education in Turkey is mostly based on the Hanafī madhab. On the other hand, in Jordan, teachers do not direct students to a particular sect. While comparative Islamic law course is compulsory in Jordan, it is not compulsory but optional in Turkey. These two methods are not the same in terms of their results and impact on students. As a result, in this study, fiqh education in the two countries in question is compared in terms of the application of comparative law. Similar and different aspects of both countries are revealed.

 In this article, how and to what extent comparative fiqh Islamic law is applied as a method followed in fiqh education in Jordan and Turkey is discussed and compared. As a matter of fact, the fiqh education system in these two countries is different. In Jordan, theology faculties are basically divided into the usūl al-din and usul al-fiqh departments. In the Theology Faculties in Turkey, unlike in Jordan, there is no specialization specific to the science of fiqh during the undergraduate period. In Jordan, fiqh lessons are given in detail in the usul al-fiqh section, and these lessons are mostly taught comparatively by looking at different madhabs sects, which do not adhere to a single madhab. Fiqh education in Turkey is mostly based on the Hanafī madhab. On the other hand, in Jordan, teachers do not direct students to a particular sect. While comparative Islamic law course is compulsory in Jordan, it is not compulsory but optional in Turkey. These two methods are not the same in terms of their results and impact on students. As a result, in this study, fiqh education in the two countries in question is compared in terms of the application of comparative law. Similar and different aspects of both countries are revealed.

 In this article, how and to what extent comparative fiqh Islamic law is applied as a method followed in fiqh education in Jordan and Turkey is discussed and compared. As a matter of fact, the fiqh education system in these two countries is different. In Jordan, theology faculties are basically divided into the usūl al-din and usul al-fiqh departments. In the Theology Faculties in Turkey, unlike in Jordan, there is no specialization specific to the science of fiqh during the undergraduate period. In Jordan, fiqh lessons are given in detail in the usul al-fiqh section, and these lessons are mostly taught comparatively by looking at different madhabs sects, which do not adhere to a single madhab. Fiqh education in Turkey is mostly based on the Hanafī madhab. On the other hand, in Jordan, teachers do not direct students to a particular sect. While comparative Islamic law course is compulsory in Jordan, it is not compulsory but optional in Turkey. These two methods are not the same in terms of their results and impact on students. As a result, in this study, fiqh education in the two countries in question is compared in terms of the application of comparative law. Similar and different aspects of both countries are revealed.

 Bu makalede Ürdün ve Türkiyede fıkıh eğitiminde takip edilen bir yöntem olarak karşılaştırmalı hukukun nasıl ve ne derecede uygulandığı ele alınmakta ve mukayese edilmektedir. Nitekim bu iki ülkedeki fıkıh eğitim sistemi birbirinden farklıdır. Ürdünde ilahiyat fakülteleri temelde usûlüd-dîn ve usûlül-fıkıh bölümlerine ayrılmaktadır. Türkiyedeki İlahiyat Fakültelerinde ise Ürdündeki gibi lisans döneminde sadece fıkıh ilmine özgü bir ihtisaslaşma söz konusu değildir. Ürdünde usûlül-fıkıh kısmında detaylı bir şekilde fıkıh dersleri verilmekte, bu dersler çoğunlukla farklı mezheplere bakılarak karşılaştırmalı olarak okutulmakta ve tek bir mezhebe bağlı kalınmamaktadır. Türkiyedeki fıkıh eğitimi ise çoğunlukla Hanefî mezhebi merkeze alınarak yapılmaktadır. Buna karşın Ürdünde hocalar öğrencileri belli bir mezhebe yönlendirerek eğitim vermemektedir. Ürdünde mukayeseli İslâm hukuku dersi zorunlu iken Türkiyede zorunlu değil seçmelidir. Bu iki farklı yöntem; sonuçları ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri açısından da aynı değildir. Netice itibariyle bu çalışmada söz konusu iki ülkedeki fıkıh eğitimi karşılaştırmalı hukukun uygulanması açısından mukayese edilmekte; her iki ülkenin benzer ve farklı yönleri ortaya konulmaktadır.

Makale detayları

A Study on Comparative Fiqh Education at the Undergraduate Level: A Comparison Between the Universities in Jordan and Turkey

Yazarlar:

Ayşe Aktaş Sivlim

Yayıncı:

Bayburt University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Baberti Issue 19, pp.18-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Arapça

Document ID (Org No.):

2001322176

pISSN:

3023-4107

fiqh

comparative fiqh

madhab

Jordan

Turkeyfıkıh

mukayeseli fıkıh

mezhep

Ürdün

Türkiye

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ayşe Aktaş Sivlim

Yayıncı: Bayburt University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Baberti Issue 19, pp.18-35

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Arapça

Document ID (Org No.): 2001322176

pISSN: 3023-4107

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ayşe Aktaş Sivlim

Yayıncı:

Bayburt University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Baberti Issue 19, pp.18-35

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Arapça

Document ID (Org No.):

2001322176

pISSN:

3023-4107