Beginning of Attempt in Multi Act Crimes

Bilgehan Savaşcı Temiz

Makale detayları

Beginning of Attempt in Multi Act Crimes

Yazarlar:

Bilgehan Savaşcı Temiz

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.338-392

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345790

pISSN:

1306-3839

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Multi-action crimes are cases where the legal definition encompasses more than one action. Unlike single-action crimes, multi-action cri-meswhich can be categorized as compound, alternative, divisible, and habitual crimesare characterized by the enumeration of mul-tiple typical actions within the law. In the context of multi-action crimes, particularly with respect to compound action crimes, there exist discussions concerning the point at which the execution of the crime commences. One of the most significant challenges in relation to criminal attempt is the delineation of the boundary between prepa-ratory actions and the initiation of execution. The commencement of execution constitutes a matter that must be independently assessed for each type of crime. In the case of multi-action crimes, determining whether an action qualifies as preparatory or as part of the execution necessitates a separate evaluation for each crime, taking into consi-deration the elements and characteristics of the specific crime type toward which the perpetrators intent is directed. In compound action crimes, the completion of the offense requires that the actions speci-fied in the law be performed collectively. In instances where the first of the typically designated actions has been carried out but the execu-tion of the second action has not yet begun, it remains a matter of doctrinal debate whether the crime is situated at the attempt stage or remains within the preparatory phase. This study seeks to investigate the point at which the execution of actions begins in multi-action crimes, incorporating the relevant debates within legal doctrine.

 Multi-action crimes are cases where the legal definition encompasses more than one action. Unlike single-action crimes, multi-action cri-meswhich can be categorized as compound, alternative, divisible, and habitual crimesare characterized by the enumeration of mul-tiple typical actions within the law. In the context of multi-action crimes, particularly with respect to compound action crimes, there exist discussions concerning the point at which the execution of the crime commences. One of the most significant challenges in relation to criminal attempt is the delineation of the boundary between prepa-ratory actions and the initiation of execution. The commencement of execution constitutes a matter that must be independently assessed for each type of crime. In the case of multi-action crimes, determining whether an action qualifies as preparatory or as part of the execution necessitates a separate evaluation for each crime, taking into consi-deration the elements and characteristics of the specific crime type toward which the perpetrators intent is directed. In compound action crimes, the completion of the offense requires that the actions speci-fied in the law be performed collectively. In instances where the first of the typically designated actions has been carried out but the execu-tion of the second action has not yet begun, it remains a matter of doctrinal debate whether the crime is situated at the attempt stage or remains within the preparatory phase. This study seeks to investigate the point at which the execution of actions begins in multi-action crimes, incorporating the relevant debates within legal doctrine.

 Multi-action crimes are cases where the legal definition encompasses more than one action. Unlike single-action crimes, multi-action cri-meswhich can be categorized as compound, alternative, divisible, and habitual crimesare characterized by the enumeration of mul-tiple typical actions within the law. In the context of multi-action crimes, particularly with respect to compound action crimes, there exist discussions concerning the point at which the execution of the crime commences. One of the most significant challenges in relation to criminal attempt is the delineation of the boundary between prepa-ratory actions and the initiation of execution. The commencement of execution constitutes a matter that must be independently assessed for each type of crime. In the case of multi-action crimes, determining whether an action qualifies as preparatory or as part of the execution necessitates a separate evaluation for each crime, taking into consi-deration the elements and characteristics of the specific crime type toward which the perpetrators intent is directed. In compound action crimes, the completion of the offense requires that the actions speci-fied in the law be performed collectively. In instances where the first of the typically designated actions has been carried out but the execu-tion of the second action has not yet begun, it remains a matter of doctrinal debate whether the crime is situated at the attempt stage or remains within the preparatory phase. This study seeks to investigate the point at which the execution of actions begins in multi-action crimes, incorporating the relevant debates within legal doctrine.

 Çok hareketli suçlar kanuni tanımda birden fazla hareketin yer aldığı uçlardır. Kendi içerisinde birleşmiş, seçimlik, bölünebilen ve itiyadi suçlar olarak ayrılabilen çok hareketli suçlarda tek hareketli suçların aksine kanunda tipik hareket olarak birden fazla hareket sayılmıştır. Çok hareketli suçlar bakımından özellikle birleşmiş hareketli suçlar-da icranın ne zaman başladığına ilişkin tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Suça teşebbüs bakımından en önemli sorunlardan biri hazırlık hare-ketleri ile icra başlangıcı arasındaki sınırın çizilebilmesidir. İcra baş-langıcı her bir suç tipi açısından bağımsız olarak değerlendirilmesi gereken bir husustur. Çok hareketli suçlar bakımından da hareketin hazırlık hareketi mi icra hareketi mi olduğu her suç bakımından fai-lin kastının yöneldiği suç tipinin unsurları ve özellikleri dikkate alı-narak ayrı ayrı değerlendirilmelidir. Birleşmiş hareketli suçlarda su-çun oluşması yani tamamlanması için kanunda gösterilen hareketle-rin birlikte yapılması gerekmektedir. Tipik olarak gösterilen hareket-lerden birincisinin gerçekleştirildiği ancak ikinci hareketin icrasına başlanmadığı durumlarda suçun teşebbüs aşamasında mı kaldığı yoksa hazırlık hareketleri safhasında mı olduğu doktrinde tartışma-lıdır. Çalışmada doktrindeki tartışmalara da yer verilerek çok hare-ketli suçlar bakımından icra hareketlerinin ne zaman başladığı ince-lenmeye çalışılmıştır.

Makale detayları

Beginning of Attempt in Multi Act Crimes

Yazarlar:

Bilgehan Savaşcı Temiz

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.338-392

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345790

pISSN:

1306-3839

Multi-act crimes

optional act crimes

combined act crimes

begin-ning of attempt

forgery of private documentsÇok hareketli suçlar

seçimlik hareketli suçlar

birleşmiş hareketli suçlar

icra başlangıcı

özel belgede sahtecilik

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Bilgehan Savaşcı Temiz

Yayıncı: Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar: Ceza Hukuku

Dergi: Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.338-392

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001345790

pISSN: 1306-3839

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Bilgehan Savaşcı Temiz

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.338-392

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345790

pISSN:

1306-3839