The evaluation of definitions and classifications for istiʿāra in some modern Arabic rhetoric books

Ahmet Gezek

Makale detayları

The evaluation of definitions and classifications for istiʿāra in some modern Arabic rhetoric books

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Gezek

Yayıncı:

Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim

Dergi:

RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 32, pp.1216-1231

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

2/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001284246

pISSN:

2148-7782

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 İstiʿāra, which has been seen as one of the important concepts of rhetoric from the classical period to the present, and which means the use of a word or expression in a different sense for the purpose of similarity, has been defined and classified differently from the classical period until today, and separate books have been written on istiʿāra. Abdulazīz Atīq d. 1976, one of the modern Arab rhetoric writers, who defines metaphor in his book fī al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya: ʿIlm al-bayān: as a simile tashbīh that does not have one side, he classified it in three parts as taṣrīḥiyya and makniyya in terms of analogy; aṣliyya and tabaʿiyya in terms of the the structure of the word; murashshaḥa, mujarrada and muṭlaqa in terms of the characteristics of both sides of the istiʿāra. This categorization of Atīq, which opened a separate sub-title for istiʿāra tamthīliyya, was similar to the Alī al-Jārim and Muṣṭafā Emīns al-Balāgha al-Wāḍiḥa and Muḥammad Aḥmad Qāsim and Muḥyiddīn Dībs ʿUlūm al-balāgha: al-badīʿ al-bayān, al-maʿānī books. Although there is a similar classification situation in Muḥammad b. Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUthaymīns d. 2001 Durūs al-balāgha and Ali Buluts Belâgat: Meânî, beyân, bedî books, these two authors did not refer to istiʿāra tamthīliyya. Despite this situation of Muṣṭafā al-Ṣāwī al-Juwaynī d. 1988, who divides metaphor into two parts only as taṣrīḥiyya and makniyya in his book al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya Taṣīl wa tajdīd, the istiʿāra classifications in Aḥmad Muṣṭafā al-Marāghīs ʿUlūm al-balāgha book, Aḥmad al-Hāshimīs d. 1943 Jawāhir al-Balāgha book, Ḥasan Ḥabannaka al-Maydānīs d. 2004 al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya Ususuhā wa afnānuhā book and Faḍl Ḥasan ʿAbbāss d. 2011 al-Balāgha funūnuhā book are has been more comprehensive and diverse than the authors above. In this study, definitions and divisions related to metaphor in some of the Arabic rhetoric books that were written recently and came to the fore were examined. The aim of this research is to identify different methodological approaches, classifications and concepts used for metaphor in Arabic rhetoric works written in the modern period.

 İstiʿāra, which has been seen as one of the important concepts of rhetoric from the classical period to the present, and which means the use of a word or expression in a different sense for the purpose of similarity, has been defined and classified differently from the classical period until today, and separate books have been written on istiʿāra. Abdulazīz Atīq d. 1976, one of the modern Arab rhetoric writers, who defines metaphor in his book fī al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya: ʿIlm al-bayān: as a simile tashbīh that does not have one side, he classified it in three parts as taṣrīḥiyya and makniyya in terms of analogy; aṣliyya and tabaʿiyya in terms of the the structure of the word; murashshaḥa, mujarrada and muṭlaqa in terms of the characteristics of both sides of the istiʿāra. This categorization of Atīq, which opened a separate sub-title for istiʿāra tamthīliyya, was similar to the Alī al-Jārim and Muṣṭafā Emīns al-Balāgha al-Wāḍiḥa and Muḥammad Aḥmad Qāsim and Muḥyiddīn Dībs ʿUlūm al-balāgha: al-badīʿ al-bayān, al-maʿānī books. Although there is a similar classification situation in Muḥammad b. Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUthaymīns d. 2001 Durūs al-balāgha and Ali Buluts Belâgat: Meânî, beyân, bedî books, these two authors did not refer to istiʿāra tamthīliyya. Despite this situation of Muṣṭafā al-Ṣāwī al-Juwaynī d. 1988, who divides metaphor into two parts only as taṣrīḥiyya and makniyya in his book al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya Taṣīl wa tajdīd, the istiʿāra classifications in Aḥmad Muṣṭafā al-Marāghīs ʿUlūm al-balāgha book, Aḥmad al-Hāshimīs d. 1943 Jawāhir al-Balāgha book, Ḥasan Ḥabannaka al-Maydānīs d. 2004 al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya Ususuhā wa afnānuhā book and Faḍl Ḥasan ʿAbbāss d. 2011 al-Balāgha funūnuhā book are has been more comprehensive and diverse than the authors above. In this study, definitions and divisions related to metaphor in some of the Arabic rhetoric books that were written recently and came to the fore were examined. The aim of this research is to identify different methodological approaches, classifications and concepts used for metaphor in Arabic rhetoric works written in the modern period.

 İstiʿāra, which has been seen as one of the important concepts of rhetoric from the classical period to the present, and which means the use of a word or expression in a different sense for the purpose of similarity, has been defined and classified differently from the classical period until today, and separate books have been written on istiʿāra. Abdulazīz Atīq d. 1976, one of the modern Arab rhetoric writers, who defines metaphor in his book fī al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya: ʿIlm al-bayān: as a simile tashbīh that does not have one side, he classified it in three parts as taṣrīḥiyya and makniyya in terms of analogy; aṣliyya and tabaʿiyya in terms of the the structure of the word; murashshaḥa, mujarrada and muṭlaqa in terms of the characteristics of both sides of the istiʿāra. This categorization of Atīq, which opened a separate sub-title for istiʿāra tamthīliyya, was similar to the Alī al-Jārim and Muṣṭafā Emīns al-Balāgha al-Wāḍiḥa and Muḥammad Aḥmad Qāsim and Muḥyiddīn Dībs ʿUlūm al-balāgha: al-badīʿ al-bayān, al-maʿānī books. Although there is a similar classification situation in Muḥammad b. Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUthaymīns d. 2001 Durūs al-balāgha and Ali Buluts Belâgat: Meânî, beyân, bedî books, these two authors did not refer to istiʿāra tamthīliyya. Despite this situation of Muṣṭafā al-Ṣāwī al-Juwaynī d. 1988, who divides metaphor into two parts only as taṣrīḥiyya and makniyya in his book al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya Taṣīl wa tajdīd, the istiʿāra classifications in Aḥmad Muṣṭafā al-Marāghīs ʿUlūm al-balāgha book, Aḥmad al-Hāshimīs d. 1943 Jawāhir al-Balāgha book, Ḥasan Ḥabannaka al-Maydānīs d. 2004 al-Balāgha al-ʿArabiyya Ususuhā wa afnānuhā book and Faḍl Ḥasan ʿAbbāss d. 2011 al-Balāgha funūnuhā book are has been more comprehensive and diverse than the authors above. In this study, definitions and divisions related to metaphor in some of the Arabic rhetoric books that were written recently and came to the fore were examined. The aim of this research is to identify different methodological approaches, classifications and concepts used for metaphor in Arabic rhetoric works written in the modern period.

 Klasik dönemden günümüze değin önemli belâgat kavramlarından biri olarak görülen ve kelime veya ifadenin benzeme gayesiyle başka anlamda kullanılması anlamına gelen istiarenin bugüne kadar birbirinden farklı tanımları ve tasnifleri yapılmış ve istiare üzerine müstakil eserler telif edilmiştir. İstiareyi iki tarafından biri hazfedilen teşbih olarak tanımlayan modern dönem Arap belâgati müelliflerinden Abdülaziz Atîk ö. 1976 fil-Belâgatil-Arabiyye: İlmül-beyân adlı eserinde konuyu; benzeme yönüyle tasrîhiyye ve mekniyye; istiâre yapılan sözcüğün yapısı itibariyle asliyye ve tebeiyye; istiarenin iki tarafına ait özelliklerin durumu itibariyle muraşşaha, mücerrede ve mutlaka olarak üç kategoride değerlendirmiştir. İstiare-i temsîliyyeye müstakil bir alt başlık açan Atîkin bu kategorizasyonu, Alî el-Cârim ö. 1949 - Mustafa Emînin el-Belâgatül-vâdiha ve Muhammed Ahmed Kâsim - Muhyiddîn Dîbin Ulûmül-belâğa: el-Bedî vel-beyân vel-meânî kitaplarında büyük ölçüde benzer şekilde olmuştur. Muhammed b. Sâlih el-Useymînnin ö. 2001 Dürûsul-belâğasında ve Ali Bulutun Belâgat: Meânî, beyân, bedîinde ise benzer tasnif durumu olmasına rağmen bu iki müellif istiare-i temsîliyyeye değinmemiştir. el-Belâğatül-Arabiyye: Tesîl ve tecdîd adlı eserinde istiareyi sadece tasrîhiyye ve mekniyye olarak iki kısma ayıran Mustafâ es-Sâvî el-Cüveynînin ö. 1988 bu durumuna karşın, Ahmed Mustafa el-MerâğîninUlûmül-belâğa, Ahmed el-Hâşimînin ö. 1943 Cevâhirul-belâğa, Hasen Habenneke el-Meydânînin ö. 2004 el-Belâgatül-Arabiyye: Üsüsühâ ve ulûmühâ ve fünûnühâ ve Fadl Hasan Abbâsın ö. 2011 el-Belâğa fünûnühâ ve efnânühâ kitaplarındaki istiare tasnifleri yukarıdaki müelliflerden daha kapsamlı olmuştur. Bu çalışmada son dönemde telif edilen ve ön plana çıkan bazı Arap belâgati kitaplarının istiareyle ilgili tanımları ve taksimleri incelenmiştir. Bu araştırmadaki amaç, modern dönemde telif edilen Arap belâgati eserlerinde istiare ile ilgili olarak farklı metodolojik yaklaşımları, tasnifleri ve istiareye yönelik kullanılan kavramları tespit etmektir.

Makale detayları

The evaluation of definitions and classifications for istiʿāra in some modern Arabic rhetoric books

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Gezek

Yayıncı:

Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim

Dergi:

RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 32, pp.1216-1231

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

2/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001284246

pISSN:

2148-7782

Arabic Rhetoric

Rhetoric Books

Bayān

İstiʿāra.

Arap belâgati

belâgat kitapları

beyân

istiare

Arabic Rhetoric

Rhetoric Books

Bayān

İstiʿāra.

Arap belâgati

belâgat kitapları

beyân

istiare

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ahmet Gezek

Yayıncı: Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar: Dilbilim

Dergi: RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 32, pp.1216-1231

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 2/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001284246

pISSN: 2148-7782

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Gezek

Yayıncı:

Yakup YILMAZ

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim

Dergi:

RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi Issue 32, pp.1216-1231

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

2/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001284246

pISSN:

2148-7782