REFLECTION OF IDEAL CONCURRENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF OFFENCES ON OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT

Ahmet Kılıç

Makale detayları

REFLECTION OF IDEAL CONCURRENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF OFFENCES ON OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Kılıç

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.717-739

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317179

pISSN:

1306-8075

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Ideal concurrence of different types of offences presents distinctive features and requires a separate evaluation in many aspects of criminal law. One of these is the operative part of the judgment. Regarding ideal concurrence in Turkish law, there is no comprehensive evaluation on whether it is necessary to include all offences in the operative part of the judgment and, if necessary, how the operative part of the judgment should be formulated. In this study, firstly, the related decisions of the Court of Cassation and the opinions in Turkish and German doctrine are presented. Subsequently, the view argued is expressed, and legal consequences of it are evaluated. The main view argued in this study is that conviction should be produced for all offences within the scope of ideal concurrence of different types of offences. However, as per Article 44 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, one penalty must be determined based on the offence that provides the most severe penalty.

 Ideal concurrence of different types of offences presents distinctive features and requires a separate evaluation in many aspects of criminal law. One of these is the operative part of the judgment. Regarding ideal concurrence in Turkish law, there is no comprehensive evaluation on whether it is necessary to include all offences in the operative part of the judgment and, if necessary, how the operative part of the judgment should be formulated. In this study, firstly, the related decisions of the Court of Cassation and the opinions in Turkish and German doctrine are presented. Subsequently, the view argued is expressed, and legal consequences of it are evaluated. The main view argued in this study is that conviction should be produced for all offences within the scope of ideal concurrence of different types of offences. However, as per Article 44 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, one penalty must be determined based on the offence that provides the most severe penalty.

 Ideal concurrence of different types of offences presents distinctive features and requires a separate evaluation in many aspects of criminal law. One of these is the operative part of the judgment. Regarding ideal concurrence in Turkish law, there is no comprehensive evaluation on whether it is necessary to include all offences in the operative part of the judgment and, if necessary, how the operative part of the judgment should be formulated. In this study, firstly, the related decisions of the Court of Cassation and the opinions in Turkish and German doctrine are presented. Subsequently, the view argued is expressed, and legal consequences of it are evaluated. The main view argued in this study is that conviction should be produced for all offences within the scope of ideal concurrence of different types of offences. However, as per Article 44 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, one penalty must be determined based on the offence that provides the most severe penalty.

 Farklı neviden fikri içtima, ceza hukukuna ilişkin birçok hususta özellik arz eder ve ayrı bir değerlendirmeyi gerektirir. Bu hususlardan biri hüküm fıkrasıdır. Türk hukukunda, farklı neviden fikri içtima ilişkisini oluşturan tüm suçların hüküm fıkrasında yer almasının gerekli olup olmadığı ve gerekliyse hüküm fıkrasının nasıl formüle edilmesi gerektiği kapsamlı şekilde değerlendirilmemektedir. Çalışmamızda, öncelikle bu konuya ilişkin Yargıtay kararları ile Türk ve Alman doktrindeki görüşlere yer verilmiş, ardından savunduğumuz görüş ifade edilerek bu görüşün sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada savunduğumuz temel görüş; farklı neviden fikri içtima kapsamındaki tüm suçlar bakımından mahkûmiyet kararı verilmesi, ancak Türk Ceza Kanunu m. 44 gereği sadece en ağır cezayı gerektiren suça dayalı olarak bir cezanın belirlenmesi gerektiği yönündedir.

Makale detayları

REFLECTION OF IDEAL CONCURRENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF OFFENCES ON OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Kılıç

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.717-739

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317179

pISSN:

1306-8075

Ideal Concurrence of Different Types of Offences

Apparent Concurrence

Operative Part of the Judgment

Conviction

Absorption PrincipleFarklı Neviden Fikri İçtima

Görünüşte İçtima

Hüküm Fıkrası

Mahkûmiyet

Erime Sistemi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Ahmet Kılıç

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Ceza Hukuku

Dergi: Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.717-739

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001317179

pISSN: 1306-8075

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Ahmet Kılıç

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.717-739

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317179

pISSN:

1306-8075