A Critical Look at the Property Body Argument in the Context of Aesthetic Intervention Debates

Şeyma Akartepe

Makale detayları

A Critical Look at the Property Body Argument in the Context of Aesthetic Intervention Debates

Yazarlar:

Şeyma Akartepe

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.177-192

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350545

pISSN:

2146-9806

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The issue of aesthetic intervention is addressed in various contexts in fiqh works. However, it has been observed that there have been some changes in the fundamental arguments central to the justification of the legal ruling on aesthetic intervention. During the classical period, when the fiqh ruling on intervention in the body was discussed, principles such as karāma and ḥurma were central, and within this framework, the body was considered inviolable due to the sanctity of the human being. In the modern period, however, some studies on the fiqh ruling on aesthetic interventions argue that such interventions are not legitimate, based on the fact that the body is the property of Allah. The need to investigate the applicability of this argument, which is not found in the sections on intervention in the body in classical fiqh works, has come to the fore in contemporary discussions on aesthetic intervention. The aim of this article, which addresses the transformation of arguments used in discussions on the fiqh ruling on intervention in the body and the mulk Allāh argument frequently raised in the contemporary period, is to identify the foundations of the mulk Allāh argument in the Islamic thought system and the reasons for its emergence today, and to present a critical perspective by revealing its positive and negative aspects.

 The issue of aesthetic intervention is addressed in various contexts in fiqh works. However, it has been observed that there have been some changes in the fundamental arguments central to the justification of the legal ruling on aesthetic intervention. During the classical period, when the fiqh ruling on intervention in the body was discussed, principles such as karāma and ḥurma were central, and within this framework, the body was considered inviolable due to the sanctity of the human being. In the modern period, however, some studies on the fiqh ruling on aesthetic interventions argue that such interventions are not legitimate, based on the fact that the body is the property of Allah. The need to investigate the applicability of this argument, which is not found in the sections on intervention in the body in classical fiqh works, has come to the fore in contemporary discussions on aesthetic intervention. The aim of this article, which addresses the transformation of arguments used in discussions on the fiqh ruling on intervention in the body and the mulk Allāh argument frequently raised in the contemporary period, is to identify the foundations of the mulk Allāh argument in the Islamic thought system and the reasons for its emergence today, and to present a critical perspective by revealing its positive and negative aspects.

 The issue of aesthetic intervention is addressed in various contexts in fiqh works. However, it has been observed that there have been some changes in the fundamental arguments central to the justification of the legal ruling on aesthetic intervention. During the classical period, when the fiqh ruling on intervention in the body was discussed, principles such as karāma and ḥurma were central, and within this framework, the body was considered inviolable due to the sanctity of the human being. In the modern period, however, some studies on the fiqh ruling on aesthetic interventions argue that such interventions are not legitimate, based on the fact that the body is the property of Allah. The need to investigate the applicability of this argument, which is not found in the sections on intervention in the body in classical fiqh works, has come to the fore in contemporary discussions on aesthetic intervention. The aim of this article, which addresses the transformation of arguments used in discussions on the fiqh ruling on intervention in the body and the mulk Allāh argument frequently raised in the contemporary period, is to identify the foundations of the mulk Allāh argument in the Islamic thought system and the reasons for its emergence today, and to present a critical perspective by revealing its positive and negative aspects.

 Fıkıh eserlerinde estetik müdahale konusuna farklı bağlamlarda yer verilmektedir. Bununla birlikte estetik müdahalenin fıkhi hükmü gerekçelendirilirken merkeze koyulan temel argümanlarda bazı dönüşümler yaşandığı tespit edilmiştir. Klasik dönemde bedene müdahalenin fıkhi hükmü ele alınırken kerâmetül-insan ve hurmetül-beden gibi ilkelerin merkeze yerleştirildiği ve bu kapsamda insanın kerâmeti sebebiyle bedenin de dokunulmaz kabul edildiği görülmektedir. Modern döneme gelindiğinde ise estetik müdahalelerin fıkhi hükmünü konu edinen çalışmaların bir kısmında bedenin Allahın mülkü olmasına dayanarak söz konusu müdahalelerin meşru olmadığına dair açıklamalara rastlanmaktadır. Klasik fıkıh eserlerinin bedene müdahale hakkındaki bölümlerinde yer almayan bu argümanın, günümüzde estetik müdahale tartışmalarında kullanılabilirliğinin araştırılması ihtiyacı gündeme gelmektedir. Bedene müdahalenin fıkhi hükmüne dair tartışmalarda kullanılan argümanların dönüşümünü ve çağdaş dönemde sıkça gündeme gelen mülkullah argümanını konu edinen makalede amaç, mülkullah argümanının İslami düşünce sisteminde yer alan dayanaklarını ve günümüzde ortaya çıkış sebeplerini tespit etmek ve içerisinde barındırdığı olumlu ve olumsuz yönleri ortaya koyarak eleştirel bir bakış açısı sunmak olacaktır.

Makale detayları

A Critical Look at the Property Body Argument in the Context of Aesthetic Intervention Debates

Yazarlar:

Şeyma Akartepe

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.177-192

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350545

pISSN:

2146-9806

Fiqh

Body

Aesthetic Intervention

Property

Karāma

ḤurmaFıkıh

Beden

Estetik Müdahale

Mülk

Kerâmet

Hurmet

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Şeyma Akartepe

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.177-192

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001350545

pISSN: 2146-9806

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Şeyma Akartepe

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.177-192

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001350545

pISSN:

2146-9806