Ibn Rushd’s Reception of Aristotle’s Physics

Cahid Şenel

Makale detayları

Ibn Rushd’s Reception of Aristotle’s Physics

Yazarlar:

Cahid Şenel

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi:

Şarkiyat Mecmuası Issue 45, pp.117-136

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001331166

pISSN:

1307-5020

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The Physics is one of the leading works written by Aristotle on natural philosophy. There are differences in the comments on the Physics because of the way it has been reinterpreted through translations and because of how it relates to certain metaphysical and theological issues. The greatest commentator of Aristotle is undoubtedly Ibn Rushd. The various commentaries that Ibn Rushd wrote on this work influenced the world after him, especially the Latin world. This article discusses Ibn Rushds commentary method, his style in his commentaries on the Physics, and his short commentary, which has remained in Arabic to this day. It has been stated that the Latin version of Ibn Rushds long commentary on the Physics and the Hebrew version of the middle commentary have survived to the present day. The short commentary consists of a brief summary of Aristotles texts, but Ibn Rushd creates a new text by changing the order of the text and ordering it in a different way. He approaches the text with a different interpretation and reading style and includes references to philosophers such as Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius on the one hand, and al-Farabi and Ibn Bâcce on the other hand, and includes them in the discussions. However, this attempt at inclusion is made by Ibn Rushd sometimes to clarify problems and sometimes to criticize him for his inaccurate interpretations.

 The Physics is one of the leading works written by Aristotle on natural philosophy. There are differences in the comments on the Physics because of the way it has been reinterpreted through translations and because of how it relates to certain metaphysical and theological issues. The greatest commentator of Aristotle is undoubtedly Ibn Rushd. The various commentaries that Ibn Rushd wrote on this work influenced the world after him, especially the Latin world. This article discusses Ibn Rushds commentary method, his style in his commentaries on the Physics, and his short commentary, which has remained in Arabic to this day. It has been stated that the Latin version of Ibn Rushds long commentary on the Physics and the Hebrew version of the middle commentary have survived to the present day. The short commentary consists of a brief summary of Aristotles texts, but Ibn Rushd creates a new text by changing the order of the text and ordering it in a different way. He approaches the text with a different interpretation and reading style and includes references to philosophers such as Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius on the one hand, and al-Farabi and Ibn Bâcce on the other hand, and includes them in the discussions. However, this attempt at inclusion is made by Ibn Rushd sometimes to clarify problems and sometimes to criticize him for his inaccurate interpretations.

 The Physics is one of the leading works written by Aristotle on natural philosophy. There are differences in the comments on the Physics because of the way it has been reinterpreted through translations and because of how it relates to certain metaphysical and theological issues. The greatest commentator of Aristotle is undoubtedly Ibn Rushd. The various commentaries that Ibn Rushd wrote on this work influenced the world after him, especially the Latin world. This article discusses Ibn Rushds commentary method, his style in his commentaries on the Physics, and his short commentary, which has remained in Arabic to this day. It has been stated that the Latin version of Ibn Rushds long commentary on the Physics and the Hebrew version of the middle commentary have survived to the present day. The short commentary consists of a brief summary of Aristotles texts, but Ibn Rushd creates a new text by changing the order of the text and ordering it in a different way. He approaches the text with a different interpretation and reading style and includes references to philosophers such as Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius on the one hand, and al-Farabi and Ibn Bâcce on the other hand, and includes them in the discussions. However, this attempt at inclusion is made by Ibn Rushd sometimes to clarify problems and sometimes to criticize him for his inaccurate interpretations.

 Aristotelesin doğa felsefesine dair yazdığı eserlerin başında ise Fiziki gelir. Fizikin tercümeler yoluyla aktarımı yeninden kavranışı ve bir takım metafizik ve teolojik sorunlarla da ilişkisi sebebiyle hakkında yapılan yorumlarda farklılıklar gözlenir. Aristotelesin en büyük şarihi grand commentator şüphesiz İbn Rüşdtür. İbn Rüşdün bu eser üzerine yazdığı çeşitli şerhler kendisinden sonraki özellikle de Latin dünyasını etkilemiştir. Bu makalede İbn Rüşdün şerh metodu, Fizik üzerine yazdığı şerhlerdeki üslubu ve nihayetinde günümüze Arapçası ulaşan küçük şerhi el-Cevâmi ele alınmıştır. İbn Rüşdün Fizik üzerine yazdığı büyük şerhin eş-şerh Latincesi, orta şerhin et-Telhîs ise İbranicesinin günümüze ulaştığı belirtilmiştir. Küçük şerh el-Cevâmî Aristoteles metinlerinin kısa bir özetinden ibarettir, ancak İbn Rüşd metnin düzenini değiştirip farklı bir şekilde sıralayarak yeni bir metin oluşturur. Metne farklı bir yorum ve okuma biçimiyle yönelir ve bir taraftan İskender Afrodîsî ve Themistius diğer taraftan Fârâbî ve İbn Bâcce gibi filozoflara atıflarda bulunarak tartışmalara dahil eder. Ancak bu dahil etme girişimi İbn Rüşd tarafından kimi zaman problemleri açmak için kimi zaman da isabetsiz yorumlarından dolayı eleştirmek için yapılır. Ayrıca İbn Rüşd için el-Cevâmî Aristotelesçi meşşâiliğin burhanî bir söylem olarak ortaya konarak Aristotelesin metninin en önemli özellikleri arasında yer alan cedel, tartışma ve tenkit seviyesinden, matematikgeometrik kesinlik düzeyine çıkarma teşebbüsüdür.

Makale detayları

Ibn Rushd’s Reception of Aristotle’s Physics

Yazarlar:

Cahid Şenel

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi:

Şarkiyat Mecmuası Issue 45, pp.117-136

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001331166

pISSN:

1307-5020

Aristotle

Ibn Rushd

physics

al-Jawâmi‘

al-Talkhîs

CommentaryAristoteles

İbn Rüşd

fizik

cevâmi‘

telhis

şerh

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Cahid Şenel

Yayıncı: Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar: Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi: Şarkiyat Mecmuası Issue 45, pp.117-136

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 3/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001331166

pISSN: 1307-5020

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Cahid Şenel

Yayıncı:

Istanbul University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dilbilim (Diğer)

Dergi:

Şarkiyat Mecmuası Issue 45, pp.117-136

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001331166

pISSN:

1307-5020